Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2010

01-06-2010 | Gynecologic Oncology

Influence of Residual Tumor on Outcome in Ovarian Cancer Patients With FIGO Stage IV Disease

An Exploratory Analysis of the AGO-OVAR (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group)

Authors: Pauline Wimberger, PhD, Michael Wehling, MD, Nils Lehmann, PhD, Rainer Kimmig, PhD, Barbara Schmalfeldt, PhD, Alexander Burges, MD, Philipp Harter, MD, Jacobus Pfisterer, PhD, Andreas du Bois, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 6/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

One of the most important prognostic factors in advanced ovarian cancer is the macroscopic absence of residual tumor after primary surgery. The impact of surgical outcome on the survival of patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IV disease is less clear and is the subject of this study.

Methods

Surgical and survival data were documented throughout the multicenter prospective randomized phase III trials of the AGO-OVAR (OVAR-3/-5/-7) and were used for this exploratory analysis. In these studies, 573 patients with FIGO stage IV disease were first operated, then randomized and homogenously treated with a combination therapy comprising the intravenous application of platinum and paclitaxel.

Results

The median progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with stage IV ovarian cancer were 12.6 and 26.1 months, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression analysis for overall survival revealed that residual tumor, mucinous histological type, multiple sites of metastases, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status were statistically significant prognostic variables. Whereas patients with macroscopically complete resection had a statistically significant improved outcome, patients with residual disease of 0.1–1 cm and patients with residual tumor of >1 cm showed similar outcome.

Conclusions

Macroscopically complete resection in FIGO stage IV disease, irrespective of the site of distant tumor spread, is an important prognostic factor and the only prognosticator amenable to improvement by therapy. Our results suggest possible advantages of a reasonable attempt at complete cytoreduction even in FIGO stage IV disease. In addition, tumor biology could be an important factor for achieving complete resection.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, et al. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:581–92.CrossRefPubMed Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, et al. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:581–92.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Du Bois A, Quinn M, Thigpen T, et al. 2004 consensus statements on the management of ovarian cancer: final document of the 3rd International Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference (GCIG OCCC 2004). Ann Oncol. 2005;16(Suppl 8):viii7–12. Du Bois A, Quinn M, Thigpen T, et al. 2004 consensus statements on the management of ovarian cancer: final document of the 3rd International Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference (GCIG OCCC 2004). Ann Oncol. 2005;16(Suppl 8):viii7–12.
4.
go back to reference International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Changing in definitions of clinical staging for carcinoma of the cervix and ovary. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156:263–4. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Changing in definitions of clinical staging for carcinoma of the cervix and ovary. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156:263–4.
5.
go back to reference Curtin JP, Malik R, Venkatraman ES, et al. Stage IV ovarian cancer: impact of sugical debulking. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;64:9–12.CrossRefPubMed Curtin JP, Malik R, Venkatraman ES, et al. Stage IV ovarian cancer: impact of sugical debulking. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;64:9–12.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Akahira JI, Yoshikawa H, Shimizu Y, et al. Prognostic factors of stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer: a multicenter retrospective study. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;81:298–403.CrossRef Akahira JI, Yoshikawa H, Shimizu Y, et al. Prognostic factors of stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer: a multicenter retrospective study. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;81:298–403.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bristow RE, Montz FJ, Lagasse LD, et al. Survival impact of surgical cytoreduction in stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;72:278–87.CrossRefPubMed Bristow RE, Montz FJ, Lagasse LD, et al. Survival impact of surgical cytoreduction in stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;72:278–87.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Repetto L, Chiara S, Pace M, et al. Prognostic factors in stage IV ovarian carcinoma treated with platinum-based regimens. Tumori. 1990;76:274–7.PubMed Repetto L, Chiara S, Pace M, et al. Prognostic factors in stage IV ovarian carcinoma treated with platinum-based regimens. Tumori. 1990;76:274–7.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Heintz AP, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, et al. Carcinoma of the ovary. FIGO 6th annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;95(Suppl 1):S161–92.CrossRefPubMed Heintz AP, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, et al. Carcinoma of the ovary. FIGO 6th annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;95(Suppl 1):S161–92.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Winter WE III, Maxwell GL, Tian C, et al. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3621–7.CrossRefPubMed Winter WE III, Maxwell GL, Tian C, et al. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3621–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bristow RE, Tomacruz RS, Armstrong DK, et al. Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1248–59.CrossRefPubMed Bristow RE, Tomacruz RS, Armstrong DK, et al. Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1248–59.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Eisenkop SM, Spirtos NM, Friedman RL, et al. Relative influences of tumor volume before surgery and the cytoreductive outcome on survival for patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;90:390–6.CrossRefPubMed Eisenkop SM, Spirtos NM, Friedman RL, et al. Relative influences of tumor volume before surgery and the cytoreductive outcome on survival for patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;90:390–6.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Goff BA, Matthews BJ, Larson EH, et al. Predictors of comprehensive surgical treatment in patients with ovarian cancer. Cancer. 2007;109:2031–42.CrossRefPubMed Goff BA, Matthews BJ, Larson EH, et al. Predictors of comprehensive surgical treatment in patients with ovarian cancer. Cancer. 2007;109:2031–42.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Earle CC, Schrag D, Neville BA, et al. Effect of surgeon specialty on processes of care and outcomes for ovarian cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:172–80.PubMed Earle CC, Schrag D, Neville BA, et al. Effect of surgeon specialty on processes of care and outcomes for ovarian cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:172–80.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Winter WE III, Maxell GL, Tian C, et al. Tumor residual after surgical cytoreduction in prediction of clinical outcome in stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:83–9.CrossRefPubMed Winter WE III, Maxell GL, Tian C, et al. Tumor residual after surgical cytoreduction in prediction of clinical outcome in stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:83–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Goodman HM, Harlow BL, Sheets EE, et al. The role of cytoreductive surgery in the management of stage IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1992;46:367–71.CrossRefPubMed Goodman HM, Harlow BL, Sheets EE, et al. The role of cytoreductive surgery in the management of stage IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1992;46:367–71.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Liu PC, Benjamin I, Morgan MA, et al. Effect of surgical debulking on survival in stage IV ovarain cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;64:4–8.CrossRefPubMed Liu PC, Benjamin I, Morgan MA, et al. Effect of surgical debulking on survival in stage IV ovarain cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;64:4–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Munkarah AR, Hallum AV, Morris M, et al. Prognostic significance of residual disease in patients with stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;64:13–7.CrossRefPubMed Munkarah AR, Hallum AV, Morris M, et al. Prognostic significance of residual disease in patients with stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;64:13–7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Du Bois A, Luck HJ, Meier W, et al. A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel a first-line treatment of ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1320–9.PubMed Du Bois A, Luck HJ, Meier W, et al. A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel a first-line treatment of ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1320–9.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Du Bois A, Weber B, Rochon J, et al. Addition of epirubicin as a third drug to carboplatin-paclitaxel in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a prospectively randomized gynecologic cancer intergroup trial by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group and the Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Etude des Cancers Ovariens. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1127–35.CrossRefPubMed Du Bois A, Weber B, Rochon J, et al. Addition of epirubicin as a third drug to carboplatin-paclitaxel in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a prospectively randomized gynecologic cancer intergroup trial by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group and the Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Etude des Cancers Ovariens. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1127–35.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Pfisterer J, Weber B, Reuss A, et al. Randomized phase III rial to topotecan following carboplatin and paclitaxel in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a gynecologic cancer intergroup trial of the AGO-OVAR and GINECO. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1036–45.PubMedCrossRef Pfisterer J, Weber B, Reuss A, et al. Randomized phase III rial to topotecan following carboplatin and paclitaxel in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a gynecologic cancer intergroup trial of the AGO-OVAR and GINECO. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1036–45.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Du Bois A, Reuss A, Pujade-Lauraine E, et al. Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 mulitcenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe dÌnvestigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l’Ovaire (GINECO). Cancer. 2009;115:1234–44.CrossRefPubMed Du Bois A, Reuss A, Pujade-Lauraine E, et al. Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 mulitcenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe dÌnvestigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l’Ovaire (GINECO). Cancer. 2009;115:1234–44.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Benedet JL, Bender H, Jones H III, et al. FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;70:209–62. Benedet JL, Bender H, Jones H III, et al. FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;70:209–62.
24.
go back to reference Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–81.CrossRef Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–81.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Cox DR, Oakes D. Analysis of Survival Data. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1984. Cox DR, Oakes D. Analysis of Survival Data. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1984.
26.
go back to reference Crawford SC, Vasex PA, Paul J, et al. Does aggressive surgery only benefit patients with less advanced ovarian cancer? Results from an international comparison within the SCOTROC-1 Trail. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8802–11.CrossRefPubMed Crawford SC, Vasex PA, Paul J, et al. Does aggressive surgery only benefit patients with less advanced ovarian cancer? Results from an international comparison within the SCOTROC-1 Trail. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8802–11.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Bristow RE, Eisenhauer EL, Santillan A, Chi DS. Delaying the primary surgical effort for advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreduction. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;104:480–90.CrossRefPubMed Bristow RE, Eisenhauer EL, Santillan A, Chi DS. Delaying the primary surgical effort for advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreduction. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;104:480–90.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Kang S, Nam BH. Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy increase optimal cytoreduction rate in advanced ovaran cancer? Meta-analysis of 21 studies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009:16:2315–20.CrossRefPubMed Kang S, Nam BH. Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy increase optimal cytoreduction rate in advanced ovaran cancer? Meta-analysis of 21 studies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009:16:2315–20.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Vergote CG, Trope F, Amant GB, et al. EORTC-GCG/NCIC-CTG randomized trial comparing primary debulking surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIIC–IV ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer (abstract). Plenary presentation at the 12th Biennal meeting International Gynecologic Cancer Society IGCS, Bangkok, Thailand, October 25–28, 2008. Vergote CG, Trope F, Amant GB, et al. EORTC-GCG/NCIC-CTG randomized trial comparing primary debulking surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIIC–IV ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer (abstract). Plenary presentation at the 12th Biennal meeting International Gynecologic Cancer Society IGCS, Bangkok, Thailand, October 25–28, 2008.
30.
go back to reference Hess V, A’Hern R, Nasiri N, et al. Mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer: a separate entity requiring specific treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1040–4.CrossRefPubMed Hess V, A’Hern R, Nasiri N, et al. Mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer: a separate entity requiring specific treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1040–4.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Influence of Residual Tumor on Outcome in Ovarian Cancer Patients With FIGO Stage IV Disease
An Exploratory Analysis of the AGO-OVAR (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group)
Authors
Pauline Wimberger, PhD
Michael Wehling, MD
Nils Lehmann, PhD
Rainer Kimmig, PhD
Barbara Schmalfeldt, PhD
Alexander Burges, MD
Philipp Harter, MD
Jacobus Pfisterer, PhD
Andreas du Bois, PhD
Publication date
01-06-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-0964-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2010 Go to the issue