Published in:
17-01-2024 | Infertility | Assisted Reproduction Technologies
Social media’s impact on patient provider choice
Authors:
Zachary Walker, Tahireh Markert, Isa Berzansky, Andrea Lanes, Serene S. Srouji
Published in:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
|
Issue 3/2024
Login to get access
Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to investigate if social media (SM) impacts a patient’s provider choice in the field of reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI).
Methods
This was a survey-based study completed in July 2022. A survey link was distributed using Amazon Mechanical Turk, which directed participants to a Qualtrics-based survey. Participants were 18–50 years old. The primary outcome was to identify the preferred method for finding a REI provider based on time spent on SM (< 1 h, 1–3 h, 3 + h).
Results
A total of 336 responses were analyzed. Fifty-four percent of respondents used SM < 1 h, 33.33% used 1–3 h, and 12.80% used 3 + h. The majority (69.05%) of respondents stated that they would seek out a REI provider/clinic if they had difficulty conceiving. Most respondents identified asking their primary care physician (44.64%) as the primary means for finding an REI provider/clinic and did not prefer to use SM. Although Facebook (< 1 h: 30.94%, 1–3 h: 31.25%, 3 + h: 27.91%) was the most utilized SM platform among respondents, YouTube was the preferred SM platform if respondents were to follow a REI clinic with a preference for posts focusing on education (< 1 h: 55.68%, 1–3 h: 43.12%, 3 + h: 58.14%) or stress management (< 1 h: 17.61%, 1–3 h: 29.36%, 3 + h: 20.94%).
Conclusion
Most respondents utilize traditional methods when choosing their REI provider or clinic and would not utilize SM. However, SM, primarily through YouTube, may be helpful for educating infertility patients and providing support and stress relief while they undergo treatment.