Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 3/2024

17-01-2024 | Infertility | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Social media’s impact on patient provider choice

Authors: Zachary Walker, Tahireh Markert, Isa Berzansky, Andrea Lanes, Serene S. Srouji

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 3/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to investigate if social media (SM) impacts a patient’s provider choice in the field of reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI).

Methods

This was a survey-based study completed in July 2022. A survey link was distributed using Amazon Mechanical Turk, which directed participants to a Qualtrics-based survey. Participants were 18–50 years old. The primary outcome was to identify the preferred method for finding a REI provider based on time spent on SM (< 1 h, 1–3 h, 3 + h).

Results

A total of 336 responses were analyzed. Fifty-four percent of respondents used SM < 1 h, 33.33% used 1–3 h, and 12.80% used 3 + h. The majority (69.05%) of respondents stated that they would seek out a REI provider/clinic if they had difficulty conceiving. Most respondents identified asking their primary care physician (44.64%) as the primary means for finding an REI provider/clinic and did not prefer to use SM. Although Facebook (< 1 h: 30.94%, 1–3 h: 31.25%, 3 + h: 27.91%) was the most utilized SM platform among respondents, YouTube was the preferred SM platform if respondents were to follow a REI clinic with a preference for posts focusing on education (< 1 h: 55.68%, 1–3 h: 43.12%, 3 + h: 58.14%) or stress management (< 1 h: 17.61%, 1–3 h: 29.36%, 3 + h: 20.94%).

Conclusion

Most respondents utilize traditional methods when choosing their REI provider or clinic and would not utilize SM. However, SM, primarily through YouTube, may be helpful for educating infertility patients and providing support and stress relief while they undergo treatment.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Kadry B, Chu LF, Kadry B, Gammas D, MacArio A. Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating. J Med Internet Res [Internet] 2011 [cited 2022 Dec 6];13(4). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22088924/. Accessed 6 Dec 2022. Kadry B, Chu LF, Kadry B, Gammas D, MacArio A. Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating. J Med Internet Res [Internet] 2011 [cited 2022 Dec 6];13(4). Available from: https://​pubmed.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​22088924/​. Accessed 6 Dec 2022.
3.
go back to reference Rothenfluh F, Germeni E, Schulz PJ. Consumer decision-making based on review websites: are there differences between choosing a hotel and choosing a physician? J Med Internet Res [Internet] 2016 [cited 2022 Dec 6];18(6). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27311623/. Accessed 6 Dec 2022. Rothenfluh F, Germeni E, Schulz PJ. Consumer decision-making based on review websites: are there differences between choosing a hotel and choosing a physician? J Med Internet Res [Internet] 2016 [cited 2022 Dec 6];18(6). Available from: https://​pubmed.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​27311623/​. Accessed 6 Dec 2022.
8.
go back to reference Alshaalan HS, AlTamimi LA, Alshayie RA, Alsuhaibani AH. The impact of social media accounts on periocular cosmetic surgeries. Saudi J Ophthalmol Off J Saudi Ophthalmol Soc [Internet] 2021 [cited 2022 Nov 23];35(3):251–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35601847/. Accessed 6 Dec 2022. Alshaalan HS, AlTamimi LA, Alshayie RA, Alsuhaibani AH. The impact of social media accounts on periocular cosmetic surgeries. Saudi J Ophthalmol Off J Saudi Ophthalmol Soc [Internet] 2021 [cited 2022 Nov 23];35(3):251–6. Available from: https://​pubmed.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​35601847/​. Accessed 6 Dec 2022.
11.
go back to reference Fan KL, Graziano F, Economides JM, Black CK, Song DH. The public’s preferences on plastic surgery social media engagement and professionalism: demystifying the impact of demographics. Plast Reconstr Surg [Internet] 2019 [cited 2022 Nov 23];143(2):619–30. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30688911/. Accessed 6 Dec 2022. Fan KL, Graziano F, Economides JM, Black CK, Song DH. The public’s preferences on plastic surgery social media engagement and professionalism: demystifying the impact of demographics. Plast Reconstr Surg [Internet] 2019 [cited 2022 Nov 23];143(2):619–30. Available from: https://​pubmed.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​30688911/​. Accessed 6 Dec 2022.
13.
go back to reference Bartneck C, Duenser A, Moltchanova E, Zawieska K. Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in Amazon’s Mechanical Turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment. PLoS One [Internet] 2015 [cited 2023 May 12];10(4). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25876027/. Accessed 6 Dec 2022. Bartneck C, Duenser A, Moltchanova E, Zawieska K. Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in Amazon’s Mechanical Turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment. PLoS One [Internet] 2015 [cited 2023 May 12];10(4). Available from: https://​pubmed.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​25876027/​. Accessed 6 Dec 2022.
17.
go back to reference Goerl K, Ofei-Dodoo S. Patient perception of medical learners and medical education during clinical consultation at a family medicine residency. Kansas J Med [Internet] 2018 [cited 2023 Oct 8];11(4):102. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6276969/. Accessed 6 Dec 2022. Goerl K, Ofei-Dodoo S. Patient perception of medical learners and medical education during clinical consultation at a family medicine residency. Kansas J Med [Internet] 2018 [cited 2023 Oct 8];11(4):102. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6276969/. Accessed 6 Dec 2022.
Metadata
Title
Social media’s impact on patient provider choice
Authors
Zachary Walker
Tahireh Markert
Isa Berzansky
Andrea Lanes
Serene S. Srouji
Publication date
17-01-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 3/2024
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-03012-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2024

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 3/2024 Go to the issue