Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 11/2020

01-11-2020 | Infertility | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

A matched propensity score study of embryo morphokinetics following gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus human chorionic gonadotropin trigger

Authors: Galia Oron, Onit Sapir, Avital Wertheimer, Yoel Shufaro, Roni Bar-Gil, Tamar Margalit, Ekaterina Shlush, Avi Ben-Haroush

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 11/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare morphokinetic parameters and quality of embryos derived from GnRH antagonist ICSI cycles triggered either with GnRH agonist or standard hCG between matched groups of patients.

Methods

Morphokinetic parameters of embryos derived from matched first GnRH antagonist ICSI cycles triggered by GnRH agonist or standard hCG between 2013 and 2016 were compared. Matching was performed for maternal age, peak estradiol levels, and number of oocytes retrieved. Outcome measures were: time to pronucleus fading (tPNf), cleavage timings (t2-t8), synchrony of the second and third cycles (S2 and S3), duration of the second and third cycle (CC2 and CC3), optimal cell cycle division parameters, and known implantation data (KID) scoring for embryo quality. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses were performed for confounding factors.

Results

We analyzed 824 embryos from 84 GnRH agonist trigger cycles and 746 embryos from 84 matched hCG trigger cycles. Embryos derived from the cycles triggered with hCG triggering cleaved faster than those deriving from GnRH agonist trigger. The differences were significant throughout most stages of embryo development (t3-t6), and a shorter second cell cycle duration of the hCG trigger embryos was observed. There was no difference in synchrony of the second and third cell cycles and the optimal cell cycle division parameters between the two groups, but there was a higher percentage of embryos without multinucleation in the hCG trigger group (27.8% vs. 21.6%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The type of trigger in matched antagonist ICSI cycles was found to affect early embryo cleavage times but not embryo quality.
Literature
5.
10.
go back to reference Itskovitz-Eldor J, Kol S, Mannaerts B. Use of a single bolus of GnRH agonist triptorelin to trigger ovulation after GnRH antagonist ganirelix treatment in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction, with special reference to the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndro. Hum Reprod. 2000;177:7–11. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200611141.CrossRef Itskovitz-Eldor J, Kol S, Mannaerts B. Use of a single bolus of GnRH agonist triptorelin to trigger ovulation after GnRH antagonist ganirelix treatment in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction, with special reference to the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndro. Hum Reprod. 2000;177:7–11. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1083/​jcb.​200611141.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Itskovitz J, Boldes R, Levron J, Erlik Y, Kahana L, Brandes JM. Induction of preovulatory luteinizing hormone surge and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Fertil Steril. 1991;56:213–20.CrossRef Itskovitz J, Boldes R, Levron J, Erlik Y, Kahana L, Brandes JM. Induction of preovulatory luteinizing hormone surge and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Fertil Steril. 1991;56:213–20.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Humaiden P, Papanikolaou EG, Kyrou D, Alsbjerg B, Polyzos NP, Devroey P, et al. The luteal phase after GnRH-agonist triggering of ovulation: present and future perspectives. Reprod BioMed Online. 2012;24:134–41.CrossRef Humaiden P, Papanikolaou EG, Kyrou D, Alsbjerg B, Polyzos NP, Devroey P, et al. The luteal phase after GnRH-agonist triggering of ovulation: present and future perspectives. Reprod BioMed Online. 2012;24:134–41.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Alikani M, Calderon G, Tomkin G, Garrisi J, Kokot M, Cohen J. Cleavage anomalies in early human embryos and survival after prolonged culture in-vitro. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2634–43.CrossRef Alikani M, Calderon G, Tomkin G, Garrisi J, Kokot M, Cohen J. Cleavage anomalies in early human embryos and survival after prolonged culture in-vitro. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2634–43.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Petersen BM, Boel M, Montag M, Gardner DK. Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2231–44.CrossRef Petersen BM, Boel M, Montag M, Gardner DK. Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2231–44.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Alyasin A, Mehdinejadiani S. GnRH Agonist trigger versus HCG trigger in GnRH antagonist in IVF/ICSI cycles: a review article. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2016;14:557–66. Alyasin A, Mehdinejadiani S. GnRH Agonist trigger versus HCG trigger in GnRH antagonist in IVF/ICSI cycles: a review article. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2016;14:557–66.
25.
go back to reference Shapiro BS, Andersen CY. Major drawbacks and additional benefits of agonist trigger-not ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome related. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:874–8.CrossRef Shapiro BS, Andersen CY. Major drawbacks and additional benefits of agonist trigger-not ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome related. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:874–8.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Humaidan P, Engmann L, Benadiva C. Luteal phase supplementation after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger in fresh embryo transfer: the American versus European approaches. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:879–85.CrossRef Humaidan P, Engmann L, Benadiva C. Luteal phase supplementation after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger in fresh embryo transfer: the American versus European approaches. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:879–85.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A matched propensity score study of embryo morphokinetics following gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus human chorionic gonadotropin trigger
Authors
Galia Oron
Onit Sapir
Avital Wertheimer
Yoel Shufaro
Roni Bar-Gil
Tamar Margalit
Ekaterina Shlush
Avi Ben-Haroush
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 11/2020
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01953-w

Other articles of this Issue 11/2020

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 11/2020 Go to the issue