Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2019

01-12-2019 | Infertility | Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine

Endometrial thickness as a predictor of ectopic pregnancy in 1125 in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles: a matched case–control study

Authors: Xitong Liu, Pengfei Qu, Haiyan Bai, Wenhao Shi, Juanzi Shi

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The ectopic pregnancy (EP) rate after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) is higher than after spontaneous conception. The reason for the increased risk of EP is not clear. We aimed to determine the risk factors associated with EP in patients undergoing IVF-ET.

Methods

This was a 1:4 matched case–control study that enrolled 225 EP patients and 900 matched intrauterine pregnancy patients from the ART center of Northwest Women’s and Children’s Hospital from January 2014 to April 2018. Conditional logistic regression was used to analyze the association between risk factors and EP, and a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated for the predictors of EP.

Results

Our findings showed that tubal factor (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.12–2.31) and pelvic surgery other than cesarean section (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.26–3.29) were associated with a higher risk of EP (p = 0.001). An endometrial thickness > 12 mm prior to embryo transfer (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.13–0.56) and the number of transferable embryos (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.65–0.78) were protective factors against EP (p < 0.001). The other factors did not have a significant effect on the probability of developing ectopic pregnancy. The area under the curve of the endometrial thickness and the number of transferable embryos for EP prediction were higher than those for tubal factor and pelvic surgery other than cesarean section.

Conclusions

An endometrial thickness > 12 mm is a strong protective factor against ectopic pregnancy. Attention should be paid to women with specific characteristics who have undergone IVF-ET.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Juneau C, Bates GW (2012) Reproductive outcomes after medical and surgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 55:455–460CrossRef Juneau C, Bates GW (2012) Reproductive outcomes after medical and surgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 55:455–460CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Milki AA, Jun SH (2003) Ectopic pregnancy rates with day 3 vs day 5 embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childb 3:7CrossRef Milki AA, Jun SH (2003) Ectopic pregnancy rates with day 3 vs day 5 embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childb 3:7CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Londra L, Moreau C, Strobino D, Garcia J, Zacur H, Zhao Y (2015) Ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: differences between fresh and frozen-thawed cycles. Fertil Steril 104:110–118CrossRef Londra L, Moreau C, Strobino D, Garcia J, Zacur H, Zhao Y (2015) Ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: differences between fresh and frozen-thawed cycles. Fertil Steril 104:110–118CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Refaat B, Dalton E, Ledger WL (2015) Ectopic pregnancy secondary to in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer: pathogenic mechanisms and management strategies. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 13:30CrossRef Refaat B, Dalton E, Ledger WL (2015) Ectopic pregnancy secondary to in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer: pathogenic mechanisms and management strategies. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 13:30CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Stulberg DB, Cain L, Dahlquist IH (2016) Ectopic pregnancy morbidity and mortality in low-income women, 2004–2008. Hum Reprod 31:666–671CrossRef Stulberg DB, Cain L, Dahlquist IH (2016) Ectopic pregnancy morbidity and mortality in low-income women, 2004–2008. Hum Reprod 31:666–671CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Muller V, Makhmadalieva M, Kogan I (2016) Ectopic pregnancy following in vitro fertilization: meta-analysis and single-center experience during 6 years. Gynecol Endocrinol 32:69–74CrossRef Muller V, Makhmadalieva M, Kogan I (2016) Ectopic pregnancy following in vitro fertilization: meta-analysis and single-center experience during 6 years. Gynecol Endocrinol 32:69–74CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cheng LY, Lin PY, Huang FJ (2015) Ectopic pregnancy following in vitro fertilization with embryo transfer: a single-center experience during 15 years. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 54:541–545CrossRef Cheng LY, Lin PY, Huang FJ (2015) Ectopic pregnancy following in vitro fertilization with embryo transfer: a single-center experience during 15 years. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 54:541–545CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rombauts L, McMaster R, Motteram C, Fernando S (2015) Risk of ectopic pregnancy is linked to endometrial thickness in a retrospective cohort study of 8120 assisted reproduction technology cycles. Hum Reprod 30:2846–2852PubMed Rombauts L, McMaster R, Motteram C, Fernando S (2015) Risk of ectopic pregnancy is linked to endometrial thickness in a retrospective cohort study of 8120 assisted reproduction technology cycles. Hum Reprod 30:2846–2852PubMed
9.
go back to reference Acharya KS, Acharya CR, Provost MP, Yeh JS, Steward RG, Eaton JL (2015) Ectopic pregnancy rate increases with the number of retrieved oocytes in autologous in vitro fertilization with non-tubal infertility but not donor/recipient cycles: an analysis of 109,140 clinical pregnancies from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. Fertil Steril 104:873–878CrossRef Acharya KS, Acharya CR, Provost MP, Yeh JS, Steward RG, Eaton JL (2015) Ectopic pregnancy rate increases with the number of retrieved oocytes in autologous in vitro fertilization with non-tubal infertility but not donor/recipient cycles: an analysis of 109,140 clinical pregnancies from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. Fertil Steril 104:873–878CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Toikkanen S, Joensuu H, Erkkola R (1993) DNA aneuploidy in ectopic pregnancy and spontaneous abortions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 51:9–13CrossRef Toikkanen S, Joensuu H, Erkkola R (1993) DNA aneuploidy in ectopic pregnancy and spontaneous abortions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 51:9–13CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fang C, Huang R, Wei LN, Jia L (2015) Frozen-thawed day 5 blastocyst transfer is associated with a lower risk of ectopic pregnancy than day 3 transfer and fresh transfer. Fertil Steril 103:655–661 (e3) CrossRef Fang C, Huang R, Wei LN, Jia L (2015) Frozen-thawed day 5 blastocyst transfer is associated with a lower risk of ectopic pregnancy than day 3 transfer and fresh transfer. Fertil Steril 103:655–661 (e3) CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zhang B, Cui L, Tang R, Ding L, Yan L, Chen ZJ (2017) Reduced ectopic pregnancy rate on day 5 embryo transfer compared with day 3: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 12:e0169837CrossRef Zhang B, Cui L, Tang R, Ding L, Yan L, Chen ZJ (2017) Reduced ectopic pregnancy rate on day 5 embryo transfer compared with day 3: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 12:e0169837CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jee BC, Suh CS, Kim SH (2009) Ectopic pregnancy rates after frozen versus fresh embryo transfer: a meta-analysis. Gynecol Obstet Invest 68:53–57CrossRef Jee BC, Suh CS, Kim SH (2009) Ectopic pregnancy rates after frozen versus fresh embryo transfer: a meta-analysis. Gynecol Obstet Invest 68:53–57CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Malak M, Tawfeeq T, Holzer H, Tulandi T (2011) Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization treatment. Gynaecol Can 33:617–619CrossRef Malak M, Tawfeeq T, Holzer H, Tulandi T (2011) Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization treatment. Gynaecol Can 33:617–619CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chang HJ, Suh CS (2010) Ectopic pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology: what are the risk factors? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 22:202–207CrossRef Chang HJ, Suh CS (2010) Ectopic pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology: what are the risk factors? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 22:202–207CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mehta TS, Levine D, McArdle CR (1999) Lack of sensitivity of endometrial thickness in predicting the presence of an ectopic pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 18:117–122CrossRef Mehta TS, Levine D, McArdle CR (1999) Lack of sensitivity of endometrial thickness in predicting the presence of an ectopic pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 18:117–122CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Moschos E, Twickler DM (2008) Endometrial thickness predicts intrauterine pregnancy in patients with pregnancy of unknown location. Ultras Obstet Gynecol 32:929–934CrossRef Moschos E, Twickler DM (2008) Endometrial thickness predicts intrauterine pregnancy in patients with pregnancy of unknown location. Ultras Obstet Gynecol 32:929–934CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Yuan X, Saravelos SH, Wang Q, Xu Y, Li TC, Zhou C (2016) Endometrial thickness as a predictor of pregnancy outcomes in 10787 fresh IVF-ICSI cycles. Rerod Biomed Online 33:197–205CrossRef Yuan X, Saravelos SH, Wang Q, Xu Y, Li TC, Zhou C (2016) Endometrial thickness as a predictor of pregnancy outcomes in 10787 fresh IVF-ICSI cycles. Rerod Biomed Online 33:197–205CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Spandorfer SD, Barnhart KT (1996) Endometrial stripe thickness as a predictor of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 66:474–477CrossRef Spandorfer SD, Barnhart KT (1996) Endometrial stripe thickness as a predictor of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 66:474–477CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ellaithy M, Abdelaziz A, Hassan MF (2013) Outcome prediction in pregnancies of unknown location using endometrial thickness measurement: is this of real clinical value? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 168:68–74CrossRef Ellaithy M, Abdelaziz A, Hassan MF (2013) Outcome prediction in pregnancies of unknown location using endometrial thickness measurement: is this of real clinical value? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 168:68–74CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hammoud AO, Hammoud I, Bujold E, Gonik B, Diamond MP, Johnson SC (2005) The role of sonographic endometrial patterns and endometrial thickness in the differential diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1370–1375CrossRef Hammoud AO, Hammoud I, Bujold E, Gonik B, Diamond MP, Johnson SC (2005) The role of sonographic endometrial patterns and endometrial thickness in the differential diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1370–1375CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Endometrial thickness as a predictor of ectopic pregnancy in 1125 in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles: a matched case–control study
Authors
Xitong Liu
Pengfei Qu
Haiyan Bai
Wenhao Shi
Juanzi Shi
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05353-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2019 Go to the issue