Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Pediatrics
Published in: BMC Pediatrics 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Infant formula feeding practices and the role of advice and support: an exploratory qualitative study

Authors: Jessica Appleton, Rachel Laws, Catherine Georgina Russell, Cathrine Fowler, Karen J. Campbell, Elizabeth Denney-Wilson

Published in: BMC Pediatrics | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Infant formula feeding practices are an important consideration for obesity prevention. An infant’s diet is influential on their later risk of developing overweight or obesity, yet very little is known about infant formula feeding practices. It is plausible that certain modifiable practices may put children at higher risk of developing overweight or obesity, for example how much and how often a baby is fed. Understanding how parents use infant formula and what factors may influence this practice is therefore important. Moreover, parents who feed their infants formula have identified a lack of support and access to resources to guide them. Therefore this study aimed to explore parents’ infant formula feeding practices to understand how parents use infant formula and what factors may influence this practice.

Methods

Using an explorative qualitative design, data were collected using semi-structured telephone interviews and analysed using a pragmatic inductive approach to thematic analysis.

Results

A total of 24 mothers from across Australia were interviewed. Mothers are influenced by a number of factors in relation to their infant formula feeding practice. These factors include information on the formula tin and marketing from formula manufacturers, particularly in relation to choosing the type of formula. Their formula feeding practices are also influenced by their interpretation of infant cues, and the amount of formula in the bottle. Many mothers would like more information to aid their practices but barriers exist to accessing health professional advice and support, so mothers may rely on informal sources. Some women reported that the social environment surrounding infant feeding wherein breastfeeding is promoted as the best option leads a feeling of stigma when formula feeding.

Conclusions

Additional support for parents’ feeding their infants with formula is necessary. Health professionals and policy around infant formula use should include how formula information may be provided to parents who use formula in ways that do not undermine breastfeeding promotion. Further observational research should seek to understand the interaction between advice, interpretation of cues and the amount formula fed to infants.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Yang Z, Huffman SL. Nutrition in pregnancy and early childhood and associations with obesity in developing countries. Maternal & child nutrition. 2013;9(S1):105–19.CrossRef
2.
Gaffney KF, Kitsantas P, Cheema J. Clinical practice guidelines for feeding behaviors and weight-for-age at 12 months: a secondary analysis of the infant feeding practices study II. Worldviews Evid-Based Nurs. 2012:234–42.
3.
Gubbels JS, et al. Association of breast-feeding and feeding on demand with child weight status up to 4 years. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6:e515–22.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Kramer MS. Do breast-feeding and delayed introduction of solid foods protect against subsequent obesity? J Pediatr. 1981;98(6):883–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Weng SF, et al. Estimating overweight risk in childhood from predictors during infancy. Pediatrics. 2013;132(2):e414–21.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Baird J, et al. Being big or growing fast: systematic review of size and growth in infancy and later obesity. Br Med J. 2005;331(7522)
7.
Monteiro POA, Victora C. Rapid growth in infancy and childhood and obesity in later life–a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2005;6(2):143–54.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Koletzko B, et al. Lower protein in infant formula is associated with lower weight up to age 2 y: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(6):1836–45.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Weber M, et al. Lower protein content in infant formula reduces BMI and obesity risk at school age: follow-up of a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99:1041–51.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Almquist-Tangen G, et al. Milk cereal drink increases BMI risk at 12 and 18 months, but formula does not. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102(12):1174–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Hodges EA, et al. Maternal decisions about the initiation and termination of infant feeding. Appetite. 2008;50(2–3):333–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Shloim N, et al. Looking for cues – infant communication of hunger and satiation during milk feeding. Appetite. 2017;108:74-82.
13.
Gildea A, Sloan S, Stewart M. Sources of feeding advice in the first year of life: who do parents value? Community Practitioner. 2009;82(3):27–31.PubMed
14.
McInnes RJ, et al. Significant others, situations and infant feeding behaviour change processes: a serial qualitative interview study. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth. 2013;13(1):1–13.CrossRef
15.
Berry NJ, Jones SC, Iverson D. Relax, you're soaking in it: sources of information about infant formula. Breastfeeding Review. 2011;19(1):9–18.PubMed
16.
Lagan BM, et al. ‘The midwives aren't allowed to tell you’: perceived infant feeding policy restrictions in a formula feeding culture–the feeding your baby study. Midwifery. 2014;30(3):e49–55.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Lakshman R, Ogilvie D, Ong KK. Mothers' experience of bottle-feeding: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Archives of Disease in Children. 2009;94:596–601.CrossRef
18.
Wirihana LA, Barnard A. Women's perceptions of their healthcare experience when they choose not to breastfeed. Women and Birth. 2012;25(3):135–41.CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
Liamputtong P. Infant feeding beliefs and practices across cultures: an introduction. In: Infant feeding practices a cross-cultural perspective, P. Liamputtong. New York: Springer; 2011.CrossRef
21.
Sheehan A, Schmied V, Barclay L. Complex decisions: theorizing women’s infant feeding decisions in the first 6 weeks after birth. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(2):371–80.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Callaghan JEM, Lazard L. ‘Please don’t put the whole dang thing out there!’: A discursive analysis of internet discussions around infant feeding. Psychol Health. 2012;27(8):938–55.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Schafer EJ, et al. Social contexts of infant feeding and infant feeding decisions. J Hum Lact. 2015;32(1):132-140.
24.
Williams K, Donaghue N, Kurz T. “Giving guilt the Flick”? An investigation of mothers’ talk about guilt in relation to infant feeding. Psychol Women Q. 2013;37(1):97–112.CrossRef
25.
Patton, M.Q., Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Fourth edition ed. 2015, Thousand Oaks California USA: Sage Publications.
26.
Ritchie, J. and J. Lewis, Eds. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. 2003, Sage: London.
27.
QSR International Pty Ltd., NVivo qualitative data analysis Software. Version 10. 2012.
28.
Hurley, K.M., M.B. Cross, and S.O. Hughes, A systematic review of responsive feeding and child obesity in high-income countries. The Journal of Nutrition, 2011: p. jn. 110.130047.
29.
Lakshman R, et al. Development of a questionnaire to assess maternal attitudes towards infant growth and milk feeding practices. International Journal Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2011;8(35).
30.
Ventura AK, Golen RP. A pilot study comparing opaque, weighted bottles with conventional, clear bottles for infant feeding. Appetite. 2015;85:178–84.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Dollberg S, Lahav S, Mimouni FB. A comparison of intakes of breast-fed and bottle-fed infants during the first two days of life. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001;20(3):209–11.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Tarrant RC, et al. Mothers who formula feed: their practices, support needs and factors influencing their infant feeding decision. Child Care in Practice. 2012;19(1):78–94.CrossRef
33.
McNally J, et al. Communicating hunger and satiation in the first 2 years of life: a systematic review. Maternal & Child Nut. 2016;12(2):205-228.
34.
Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. In: D.o.H a Ageing, editor. Marketing in Australia of infant iormulas: Manufacturers and importers agreement - The MAIF agreement. Canberra: ACT; 2003.
35.
Cattaneo, A., et al., Advertisements of follow-on formula and their perception by pregnant women and mothers in Italy. Archives of disease in childhood, 2014: p. archdischild-2014-306996.
36.
Berry NJ, Jones SC, Iverson D. Circumventing the WHO Code? An observational study. Arch Dis Childhood. 2012:97(4):320-325.
37.
Trickey H, Newburn M. Goals, dilemmas and assumptions in infant feeding education and support. Applying theory of constraints thinking tools to develop new priorities for action. Maternal & Child nutrition. 2014;10(1):72–91.CrossRef
38.
Blair, M., C. Frazer, and K. Gaskin, The feeding guide. Seventh edition ed. 2014, The Children's Hospital at Westmead: James Fairfax Institute of Paediatric Nutrition.
39.
Battersby S. An evaluation of midwives' knowledge of formula feeding and their role in supporting mothers who formula feed their infants. The journal of family health care. 2010;20(6):192–7.PubMed
40.
Hegedus, J. and J. Mullan, Are we adequately providing support services for optimal infant nutrition in Australia? A study in regional NSW. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 2014: p. -.
41.
World Health Organisation, International code of marketing of breast-milk substitutes. 1981, World Health Organization: Geneva.
42.
Jennifer F, et al. We only talk about breast feeding: a discourse analysis of infant feeding messages in antenatal group-based education. Midwifery. 2013;29(5):425–33.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Sheehan A, Schmied V, The imperative to breastfeed: an Australian perspective, in Infant Feeding Practices: A Cross-Cultural Perspective, P. Liamputtong, editors. Springer. Dordrecht: The Netherlands; 2011. p. 55–76.
44.
World Health Organization and UNICEF, Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative: Revised, updated and expanded for integrated care. 2009.
45.
NHMRC, Infant feeding guidlines. 2013, National Health and Medical Research Council: Canberra.
46.
Fahlquist JN. Experience of non-breastfeeding mothers: norms and ethically responsible risk communication. Nursing Ethics. 2016;23(2):231-241.
47.
48.
Marshall JL, Godfrey M, Renfrew MJ. Being a ‘good mother’: managing breastfeeding and merging identities. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(10):2147–59.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Lechuga VM. Exploring culture from a distance: the utility of telephone interviews in qualitative research. Int J Qual Stud Educ. 2012;25(3):251–68.CrossRef
50.
51.
52.
Metadata
Title
Infant formula feeding practices and the role of advice and support: an exploratory qualitative study
Authors
Jessica Appleton
Rachel Laws
Catherine Georgina Russell
Cathrine Fowler
Karen J. Campbell
Elizabeth Denney-Wilson
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pediatrics / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2431
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0977-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Pediatrics 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

Oral medicine acceptance in infants and toddlers: measurement properties of the caregiver-administered Children’s acceptance tool (CareCAT)

Research article

Effectiveness of early intervention programs for parents of preterm infants: a meta-review of systematic reviews

Research article

Caffeine is a risk factor for osteopenia of prematurity in preterm infants: a cohort study

Research article

Neonatal tactile stimulation at birth in a low-resource setting

Case report

Extragonadal germ cell tumor of the posterior mediastinum in a child complicated with spinal cord compression: a case report

Study protocol

Mobility may impact attention abilities in healthy term or prematurely born children at 7-years of age: protocol for an intervention controlled trial