Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pediatrics 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Oral medicine acceptance in infants and toddlers: measurement properties of the caregiver-administered Children’s acceptance tool (CareCAT)

Authors: Joern Blume, Ana Lorena Ruano, Siri Wang, Debra J. Jackson, Thorkild Tylleskär, Liv Inger Strand

Published in: BMC Pediatrics | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Developing age-appropriate medications remains a challenge in particular for the population of infants and toddlers, as they are not able to reliably self-report if they would accept and consequently take an oral medicine. Therefore, it is common to use caregivers as proxies when assessing medicine acceptance. The outcome measures used in this research field differ and most importantly lack validation, implying a persisting gap in knowledge and controversy in the field. The newly developed Caregiver-administered Children’s Acceptance Tool (CareCAT) is based on a 5-point nominal scale, with descriptors of medication acceptance behavior. This cross-sectional study assessed the measurement properties of the tool with regards to the user’s understanding and its intra- and inter-rater reliability.

Methods

Participating caregivers were enrolled at a primary healthcare facility where their children (median age 6 months) had been prescribed oral antibiotics. Caregivers, trained observers and the tool developer observed and scored on the CareCAT tool what behavior children exhibited when receiving the medicine (n = 104). The video-records of this process served as replicate observations (n = 69). After using the tool caregivers were asked to explain their observations and the tool descriptors in their own words. The tool’s reliability was assessed by percentage agreement and Cohen’s unweighted kappa coefficients of agreement for nominal scales.

Results

The study found that caregivers using CareCAT had a satisfactory understanding of the tool’s descriptors. Using its dichotomized scores the tool reliably was strong for acceptance behavior (agreement inter-rater 84–88%, kappa 0.66–0.76; intra-rater 87–89%, kappa 0.68–0.72) and completeness of medicine ingestion (agreement inter-rater 82–86%, kappa 0.59–0.67; intra-rater 85–93%, kappa 0.50–0.70).

Conclusions

The CareCAT is a low-cost, easy-to-use and reliable instrument, which is relevant to assess acceptance behavior and completeness of medicine ingestion, both of which are of significant importance for developing age-appropriate medications in infants and toddlers.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Ranmal S, Tuleu C. Demonstrating evidence of acceptability: the “Catch-22” of pediatric formulation development. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2013;94:582–4. Ranmal S, Tuleu C. Demonstrating evidence of acceptability: the “Catch-22” of pediatric formulation development. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2013;94:582–4.
4.
go back to reference Kozarewicz P. Regulatory perspectives on acceptability testing of dosage forms in children. Int J Pharm. 2014;469:245–8.PubMed Kozarewicz P. Regulatory perspectives on acceptability testing of dosage forms in children. Int J Pharm. 2014;469:245–8.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Sjovall J, Fogh A, Huitfeldt B, Karlsson G, Nylen O. Methods for evaluating the taste of paediatric formulations in children: a comparison between the facial hedonic method and the patients' own spontaneous verbal judgement. Eur J Pediatr. 1984;141:243–7.PubMed Sjovall J, Fogh A, Huitfeldt B, Karlsson G, Nylen O. Methods for evaluating the taste of paediatric formulations in children: a comparison between the facial hedonic method and the patients' own spontaneous verbal judgement. Eur J Pediatr. 1984;141:243–7.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Matsui D, Lim R, Tschen T, Rieder MJ. Assessment of the palatability of beta-lactamase-resistant antibiotics in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151:599–602.PubMed Matsui D, Lim R, Tschen T, Rieder MJ. Assessment of the palatability of beta-lactamase-resistant antibiotics in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151:599–602.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Klingmann V, Spomer N, Lerch C, Stoltenberg I, Fromke C, Bosse HM, Breitkreutz J, Meissner T. Favorable acceptance of mini-tablets compared with syrup: a randomized controlled trial in infants and preschool children. J Pediatr. 2013;163:1728–32. e1721PubMed Klingmann V, Spomer N, Lerch C, Stoltenberg I, Fromke C, Bosse HM, Breitkreutz J, Meissner T. Favorable acceptance of mini-tablets compared with syrup: a randomized controlled trial in infants and preschool children. J Pediatr. 2013;163:1728–32. e1721PubMed
8.
go back to reference Orubu ES, Tuleu C. Medicines for children: flexible solid oral formulations. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95:238–40.PubMedPubMedCentral Orubu ES, Tuleu C. Medicines for children: flexible solid oral formulations. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95:238–40.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Matza LS, Patrick DL, Riley AW, Alexander JJ, Rajmil L, Pleil AM, Bullinger M. Pediatric patient-reported outcome instruments for research to support medical product labeling: report of the ISPOR PRO good research practices for the assessment of children and adolescents task force. Value Health. 2013;16:461–79.PubMed Matza LS, Patrick DL, Riley AW, Alexander JJ, Rajmil L, Pleil AM, Bullinger M. Pediatric patient-reported outcome instruments for research to support medical product labeling: report of the ISPOR PRO good research practices for the assessment of children and adolescents task force. Value Health. 2013;16:461–79.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Matza LS, Swensen AR, Flood EM, Secnik K, Leidy NK. Assessment of health-related quality of life in children: a review of conceptual, methodological, and regulatory issues. Value Health. 2004;7:79–92.PubMed Matza LS, Swensen AR, Flood EM, Secnik K, Leidy NK. Assessment of health-related quality of life in children: a review of conceptual, methodological, and regulatory issues. Value Health. 2004;7:79–92.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Uhari M, Eskelinen L, Jokisalo J. Acceptance of antibiotic mixtures by infants and children. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;30:503–4.PubMed Uhari M, Eskelinen L, Jokisalo J. Acceptance of antibiotic mixtures by infants and children. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;30:503–4.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Klingmann V, Seitz A, Meissner T, Breitkreutz J, Moeltner A, Bosse HM. Acceptability of uncoated mini-tablets in neonates--a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2015;167:893–6. e892PubMed Klingmann V, Seitz A, Meissner T, Breitkreutz J, Moeltner A, Bosse HM. Acceptability of uncoated mini-tablets in neonates--a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2015;167:893–6. e892PubMed
13.
go back to reference Kekitiinwa A, Musiime V, Thomason MJ, Mirembe G, et al. Acceptability of lopinavir/r pellets (minitabs), tablets and syrups in HIV-infected children. Antivir Ther. 2016;21:579–85.PubMed Kekitiinwa A, Musiime V, Thomason MJ, Mirembe G, et al. Acceptability of lopinavir/r pellets (minitabs), tablets and syrups in HIV-infected children. Antivir Ther. 2016;21:579–85.PubMed
14.
go back to reference van Riet-Nales DA, de Neef BJ, Schobben AF, Ferreira JA, Egberts TC, Rademaker CM. Acceptability of different oral formulations in infants and preschool children. Arch Dis Child. 2013;98:725–31.PubMedPubMedCentral van Riet-Nales DA, de Neef BJ, Schobben AF, Ferreira JA, Egberts TC, Rademaker CM. Acceptability of different oral formulations in infants and preschool children. Arch Dis Child. 2013;98:725–31.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Wollner A, Lecuyer A, De La Rocque F, Sedletzki G, et al. Acceptability, compliance and schedule of administration of oral antibiotics in outpatient children. Arch Pediatr. 2011;18:611–6.PubMed Wollner A, Lecuyer A, De La Rocque F, Sedletzki G, et al. Acceptability, compliance and schedule of administration of oral antibiotics in outpatient children. Arch Pediatr. 2011;18:611–6.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Zajicek A, Fossler MJ, Barrett JS, Worthington JH, et al. A report from the pediatric formulations task force: perspectives on the state of child-friendly oral dosage forms. AAPS J. 2013;15:1072–81.PubMedPubMedCentral Zajicek A, Fossler MJ, Barrett JS, Worthington JH, et al. A report from the pediatric formulations task force: perspectives on the state of child-friendly oral dosage forms. AAPS J. 2013;15:1072–81.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hrobjartsson A, Roberts C, Shoukri M, Streiner DL. Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48:661–71.PubMed Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hrobjartsson A, Roberts C, Shoukri M, Streiner DL. Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48:661–71.PubMed
19.
go back to reference De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL: Reliability: sample size for reliability studies. In: Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. 1st edn.: Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.; 2011: 126–128. De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL: Reliability: sample size for reliability studies. In: Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. 1st edn.: Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.; 2011: 126–128.
20.
go back to reference Marshall J, Rodarte A, Blumer J, Khoo KC, Akbari B, Kearns G. Pediatric pharmacodynamics of midazolam oral syrup. Pediatric Pharmacology Research Unit Network J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;40:578–89.PubMed Marshall J, Rodarte A, Blumer J, Khoo KC, Akbari B, Kearns G. Pediatric pharmacodynamics of midazolam oral syrup. Pediatric Pharmacology Research Unit Network J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;40:578–89.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.
22.
go back to reference Maclure M, Willett WC. Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic. Am J Epidemiol. 1987;126:161–9.PubMed Maclure M, Willett WC. Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic. Am J Epidemiol. 1987;126:161–9.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.PubMed Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Matsui D. Assessing palatability of medicines in children. Paediatric and Perinatal Drug Therapy. 2007;8(2):55–60. Matsui D. Assessing palatability of medicines in children. Paediatric and Perinatal Drug Therapy. 2007;8(2):55–60.
25.
go back to reference Ranmal SR, Cram A, Tuleu C. Age-appropriate and acceptable paediatric dosage forms: insights into end-user perceptions, preferences and practices from the Children's acceptability of oral formulations (CALF) study. Int J Pharm. 2016;514:296–307.PubMed Ranmal SR, Cram A, Tuleu C. Age-appropriate and acceptable paediatric dosage forms: insights into end-user perceptions, preferences and practices from the Children's acceptability of oral formulations (CALF) study. Int J Pharm. 2016;514:296–307.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Sullivan SA, Birch LL. Infant dietary experience and acceptance of solid foods. Pediatrics. 1994;93:271–7.PubMed Sullivan SA, Birch LL. Infant dietary experience and acceptance of solid foods. Pediatrics. 1994;93:271–7.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T, Wedding D, Gwet KL. A comparison of Cohen's kappa and Gwet's AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:61.PubMedPubMedCentral Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T, Wedding D, Gwet KL. A comparison of Cohen's kappa and Gwet's AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:61.PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Cohen R, de La Rocque F, Lecuyer A, Wollner C, Bodin MJ, Wollner A. Study of the acceptability of antibiotic syrups, suspensions, and oral solutions prescribed to pediatric outpatients. Eur J Pediatr. 2009;168:851–7.PubMed Cohen R, de La Rocque F, Lecuyer A, Wollner C, Bodin MJ, Wollner A. Study of the acceptability of antibiotic syrups, suspensions, and oral solutions prescribed to pediatric outpatients. Eur J Pediatr. 2009;168:851–7.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Ruiz F, Vallet T, Pensé-Lhéritier AM, Aoussat A. Standardized method to assess medicines’ acceptability: focus on paediatric population. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2017;69:406–16.PubMed Ruiz F, Vallet T, Pensé-Lhéritier AM, Aoussat A. Standardized method to assess medicines’ acceptability: focus on paediatric population. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2017;69:406–16.PubMed
30.
go back to reference van Riet-Nales DA, Ferreira JA, Schobben AF, de Neef BJ, Egberts TC, Rademaker CM. Methods of administering oral formulations and child acceptability. Int J Pharm. 2015;491:261–7.PubMed van Riet-Nales DA, Ferreira JA, Schobben AF, de Neef BJ, Egberts TC, Rademaker CM. Methods of administering oral formulations and child acceptability. Int J Pharm. 2015;491:261–7.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Pronchik D, Kasper L, Chambers J. Can parents predict a child's taste in antibiotics? Pediatr Emerg Care. 1999;15:371.PubMed Pronchik D, Kasper L, Chambers J. Can parents predict a child's taste in antibiotics? Pediatr Emerg Care. 1999;15:371.PubMed
32.
go back to reference US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures—use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Fed Regist. 2009;235:65132–3. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures—use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Fed Regist. 2009;235:65132–3.
33.
go back to reference Peryam DR, Pilgrim FJ: Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. Food Technology 1957, 11, Suppl.:9–14. Peryam DR, Pilgrim FJ: Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. Food Technology 1957, 11, Suppl.:9–14.
35.
go back to reference Fadnes LT, Taube A, Tylleskar T. How to identify information bias due to self-reporting in epidemiological research. Internet J Epidemiol. 2009;7:1–21. Fadnes LT, Taube A, Tylleskar T. How to identify information bias due to self-reporting in epidemiological research. Internet J Epidemiol. 2009;7:1–21.
36.
go back to reference Bevans KB, Riley AW, Moon J, Forrest CB. Conceptual and methodological advances in child-reported outcomes measurement. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;10:385–96.PubMedPubMedCentral Bevans KB, Riley AW, Moon J, Forrest CB. Conceptual and methodological advances in child-reported outcomes measurement. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;10:385–96.PubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Dagan R, Shvartzman P, Liss Z. Variation in acceptance of common oral antibiotic suspensions. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1994;13:686–90.PubMed Dagan R, Shvartzman P, Liss Z. Variation in acceptance of common oral antibiotic suspensions. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1994;13:686–90.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Oral medicine acceptance in infants and toddlers: measurement properties of the caregiver-administered Children’s acceptance tool (CareCAT)
Authors
Joern Blume
Ana Lorena Ruano
Siri Wang
Debra J. Jackson
Thorkild Tylleskär
Liv Inger Strand
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pediatrics / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2431
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1080-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Pediatrics 1/2018 Go to the issue