Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology 3/2017

01-09-2017

Independent dose verification for brain stereotactic radiotherapy using different add-on micro multi-leaf collimators

Authors: Shiro Nishiyama, Satoru Ishibashi, Ryo Takahashi, Hidenobu Tachibana

Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

An add-on micro multi-leaf collimator (mMLC) is used for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and brain stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), in which rotational radiotherapy may make more complex and time-consuming. We performed a retrospective study of an independent dose calculation verification for brain SRS and SRT in two institutions to show the accuracy of the verification system and propose a tolerance value for the verification. Several comparisons of static plans and patients’ plans were conducted using a phantom measurement, and patients’ plans using the patients’ own computed tomography image. We evaluated the accuracy of the Clarkson-based dose calculation based on either the equivalent square field formed by the mMLC or by the collimator jaws to determine the collimator scatter factor (S c). The results for the static plans showed good agreement (<1%), except when we used a 1 cm2 field size (<4%). The phantom measurements for the patients’ plans showed deviations of 0.1 ± 2.3 and 1.2 ± 1.6% (2 SD) for the treatment planning system and the verification system, respectively. The patients’ plans showed a deviation of 2.0 ± 2.1% (2 SD). Depending on the mMLC system, the S c was calculated using the equivalent field size formed by the mMLC. In this study, we suggest a tolerance level for the brain SRS and SRT of 2–3.5%. However, beam modeling in the treatment planning system would affect the deviation. The S c should be computed according to the size of the collimator fitted to the MLC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ramos LI, Monge RM, Aristu JJ, et al. An independent algorithm to check the monitor units calculation in radiosurgery. Med Phys. 2008;35:48–51.CrossRefPubMed Ramos LI, Monge RM, Aristu JJ, et al. An independent algorithm to check the monitor units calculation in radiosurgery. Med Phys. 2008;35:48–51.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Marcu SM, Wu QJ, Pillai K, et al. Gammplan—Leksell Gamma Knife radiosurgery treatment planning verification method. Med Phys. 2000;27:2146–9.CrossRefPubMed Marcu SM, Wu QJ, Pillai K, et al. Gammplan—Leksell Gamma Knife radiosurgery treatment planning verification method. Med Phys. 2000;27:2146–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Stern RL, Heaton R, Fraser MW, et al. Verification of monitor unit calculations for non-IMRT clinical radiotherapy: report of AAPM Task Group 114. Med Phys. 2011;38:504–30.CrossRefPubMed Stern RL, Heaton R, Fraser MW, et al. Verification of monitor unit calculations for non-IMRT clinical radiotherapy: report of AAPM Task Group 114. Med Phys. 2011;38:504–30.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Fraass B, Doppke K, Hunt M, et al. American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning. Med Phys. 1998;25:1773–829.CrossRefPubMed Fraass B, Doppke K, Hunt M, et al. American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning. Med Phys. 1998;25:1773–829.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Van Dyk J, Barnett RB, Cygler JE, et al. Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;26:261–73.CrossRefPubMed Van Dyk J, Barnett RB, Cygler JE, et al. Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;26:261–73.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Dieterich S, Cavedon C, Chuang CF, et al. Quality assurance for robotic radiosurgery: report of AAPM Task Group 135. Med Phys. 2011;38:2914–36.CrossRefPubMed Dieterich S, Cavedon C, Chuang CF, et al. Quality assurance for robotic radiosurgery: report of AAPM Task Group 135. Med Phys. 2011;38:2914–36.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Leszczynski KW, Dunscombe PB. Independent corroboration of monitor unit calculations performed by a 3D computerized planning system. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2000;1:120–5.CrossRefPubMed Leszczynski KW, Dunscombe PB. Independent corroboration of monitor unit calculations performed by a 3D computerized planning system. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2000;1:120–5.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Chan J, Russell D, Peters VG, et al. Comparison of monitor unit calculations performed with a 3D computerized planning system and independent ‘hand’ calculations: results of three years clinical experience. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2002;3:293–301.CrossRefPubMed Chan J, Russell D, Peters VG, et al. Comparison of monitor unit calculations performed with a 3D computerized planning system and independent ‘hand’ calculations: results of three years clinical experience. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2002;3:293–301.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Prado KL, Kirsner SM, Erice RC. Corrections to traditional methods of verifying tangential-breast 3D monitor-unit calculations: use of an equivalent triangle to estimate effective fields. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2003;4:51–7.CrossRefPubMed Prado KL, Kirsner SM, Erice RC. Corrections to traditional methods of verifying tangential-breast 3D monitor-unit calculations: use of an equivalent triangle to estimate effective fields. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2003;4:51–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ayyangar KM, Saw CB, Gearheart D, et al. Independent calculations to validate monitor units from ADAC treatment planning system. Med Dosim. 2003;28:79–83.CrossRefPubMed Ayyangar KM, Saw CB, Gearheart D, et al. Independent calculations to validate monitor units from ADAC treatment planning system. Med Dosim. 2003;28:79–83.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kay I, Dunscombe P. Verifying monitor unit calculations for tangential breast fields. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2006;7:50–7.CrossRefPubMed Kay I, Dunscombe P. Verifying monitor unit calculations for tangential breast fields. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2006;7:50–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kay I, Meyer T. Verifying monitor unit calculations for tangential whole breast fields in 3-dimensional planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2008;9:2713.CrossRefPubMed Kay I, Meyer T. Verifying monitor unit calculations for tangential whole breast fields in 3-dimensional planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2008;9:2713.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Daniel G, Dustin J, Christopher J. Validation of a modern second-check dosimetry system using a novel verification phantom. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18:170–7. Daniel G, Dustin J, Christopher J. Validation of a modern second-check dosimetry system using a novel verification phantom. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18:170–7.
Metadata
Title
Independent dose verification for brain stereotactic radiotherapy using different add-on micro multi-leaf collimators
Authors
Shiro Nishiyama
Satoru Ishibashi
Ryo Takahashi
Hidenobu Tachibana
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Radiological Physics and Technology / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1865-0333
Electronic ISSN: 1865-0341
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-017-0398-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Radiological Physics and Technology 3/2017 Go to the issue