Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 6/2022

01-11-2022 | Commentary

Increasing the Patient-Centeredness of Predictive Analytics Tools

Authors: Norah L. Crossnohere, Janet E. Childerhose, Seuli Bose-Brill

Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Issue 6/2022

Login to get access

Excerpt

Predictive analytics tools are fundamentally transforming the delivery of healthcare and the practice of medicine, but not necessarily in ways that matter to patients. Predictive analytics tools use artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) and other advanced statistical methods to identify patterns and predictions about a multitude of health outcomes. Perhaps the best-known application of predictive analytics in medicine is the use of automated risk factors in the electronic health record, which alerts physicians to screening and treatment priorities [1]. An emerging class of predictive analytics tools is intended to predict patient preferences for complex and challenging treatment decisions, such as predicting the end-of-life care wishes of incapacitated patients [2]. Predictive analytics tools aspire not only to aid clinical decision making but also to surpass the accuracy of human decision making, reduce errors, and lower costs. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brill SB, Moss KO, Prater L. Transformation of the doctor–patient relationship: big data, accountable care, and predictive health analytics. HEC Forum. 2019;31(4):261–82.CrossRef Brill SB, Moss KO, Prater L. Transformation of the doctor–patient relationship: big data, accountable care, and predictive health analytics. HEC Forum. 2019;31(4):261–82.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Jardas E, Wasserman D, Wendler D. Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor. J Med Ethics. 2022;48(5):304–10.PubMed Jardas E, Wasserman D, Wendler D. Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor. J Med Ethics. 2022;48(5):304–10.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Wynants L, Van Calster B, Collins GS, et al. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2020;369: m1328. Wynants L, Van Calster B, Collins GS, et al. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2020;369: m1328.
4.
go back to reference Crossnohere N, Elsaid M, Paskett J, Bose-Brill S, Bridges J. Guidelines for artificial intelligence in medicine: a literature review and content analysis of frameworks. J Med Internet Res 2022;24(8):e36823. https://doi.org/10.2196/36823 Crossnohere N, Elsaid M, Paskett J, Bose-Brill S, Bridges J. Guidelines for artificial intelligence in medicine: a literature review and content analysis of frameworks. J Med Internet Res 2022;24(8):e36823. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2196/​36823
5.
go back to reference Bjerring JC, Busch J. Artificial intelligence and patient-centered decision-making. Philos Technol. 2021;34:349–71. Bjerring JC, Busch J. Artificial intelligence and patient-centered decision-making. Philos Technol. 2021;34:349–71.
6.
go back to reference Epstein R. The science of patient-centered care. J Fam Pract. 2000;49(9):805–10.PubMed Epstein R. The science of patient-centered care. J Fam Pract. 2000;49(9):805–10.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Peterson ED. Machine learning, predictive analytics, and clinical practice: can the past inform the present? JAMA. 2019;322(23):2283–4.CrossRef Peterson ED. Machine learning, predictive analytics, and clinical practice: can the past inform the present? JAMA. 2019;322(23):2283–4.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Amarasingham R, Audet A-MJ, Bates DW, et al. Consensus statement on electronic health predictive analytics: a guiding framework to address challenges. eGEMs. 2016;4(1):1163.CrossRef Amarasingham R, Audet A-MJ, Bates DW, et al. Consensus statement on electronic health predictive analytics: a guiding framework to address challenges. eGEMs. 2016;4(1):1163.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cohen IG, Amarasingham R, Shah A, Xie B, Lo B. The legal and ethical concerns that arise from using complex predictive analytics in health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(7):1139–47.CrossRef Cohen IG, Amarasingham R, Shah A, Xie B, Lo B. The legal and ethical concerns that arise from using complex predictive analytics in health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(7):1139–47.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Braverman DW, Doernberg SN, Runge CP, Howard DS. OxRec model for assessing risk of recidivism: ethics. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(9):808–9.CrossRef Braverman DW, Doernberg SN, Runge CP, Howard DS. OxRec model for assessing risk of recidivism: ethics. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(9):808–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Matheny M, Israni S, Ahmed M, Whicher D. Artificial intelligence in health care: the hope, the hype, the promise, the peril. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine; 2019. Matheny M, Israni S, Ahmed M, Whicher D. Artificial intelligence in health care: the hope, the hype, the promise, the peril. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine; 2019.
13.
go back to reference Shaoibi A, Neelon B, Lenert LA. Shared decision making: from decision science to data science. Med Decis Mak. 2020;40(3):254–65.CrossRef Shaoibi A, Neelon B, Lenert LA. Shared decision making: from decision science to data science. Med Decis Mak. 2020;40(3):254–65.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Palazzo L, Hsu C, Barnes DE, et al. Patient and caregiver perspectives on a tool to increase recognition of undiagnosed dementia: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):1–11.CrossRef Palazzo L, Hsu C, Barnes DE, et al. Patient and caregiver perspectives on a tool to increase recognition of undiagnosed dementia: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):1–11.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Arevian AC, Bell D, Kretzman M, et al. Participatory methods to support team science development for predictive analytics in health. J Clin Transl Sci. 2018;2(3):178–82.CrossRef Arevian AC, Bell D, Kretzman M, et al. Participatory methods to support team science development for predictive analytics in health. J Clin Transl Sci. 2018;2(3):178–82.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Staniszewska S, Hill EM, Grant R, et al. Developing a framework for public involvement in mathematical and economic modelling: bringing new dynamism to vaccination policy recommendations. Patient. 2021;14(4):435–45.CrossRef Staniszewska S, Hill EM, Grant R, et al. Developing a framework for public involvement in mathematical and economic modelling: bringing new dynamism to vaccination policy recommendations. Patient. 2021;14(4):435–45.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Crossnohere NL, Fischer R, Vroom E, Furlong P, Bridges JF. A comparison of caregiver and patient preferences for treating duchenne muscular dystrophy. Patient Patient Cent Outcomes Res. 2022;15(5):577–88.CrossRef Crossnohere NL, Fischer R, Vroom E, Furlong P, Bridges JF. A comparison of caregiver and patient preferences for treating duchenne muscular dystrophy. Patient Patient Cent Outcomes Res. 2022;15(5):577–88.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Seo J, Smith CA, Thomas C, et al. Patient perspectives and experiences of preventive treatments and self-injectable devices for migraine: a focus group study. Patient. 2022;15(1):93–108.CrossRef Seo J, Smith CA, Thomas C, et al. Patient perspectives and experiences of preventive treatments and self-injectable devices for migraine: a focus group study. Patient. 2022;15(1):93–108.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Stokols D, Hall KL, Taylor BK, Moser RP. The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2):S77–89.CrossRef Stokols D, Hall KL, Taylor BK, Moser RP. The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2):S77–89.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Increasing the Patient-Centeredness of Predictive Analytics Tools
Authors
Norah L. Crossnohere
Janet E. Childerhose
Seuli Bose-Brill
Publication date
01-11-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Issue 6/2022
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Electronic ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-022-00595-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2022

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 6/2022 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine