Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2020

01-09-2020 | Incision

Extraction-site incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: should we carry out a study about prophylactic mesh closure?

Authors: Oscar Cano-Valderrama, Rodrigo Sanz-López, Inmaculada Domínguez-Serrano, Jana Dziakova, Vanesa Catalán, Mikel Rojo, Mauricio García-Alonso, José M. Mugüerza, Antonio J. Torres

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 9/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Prophylactic mesh closure has only scarcely been studied to avoid extraction-site incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The aim was to analyze extraction-site incisional hernia incidence after laparoscopic colorectal surgery to assess if prophylactic mesh closure should be studied.

Methods

A retrospective analytic cohort study was conducted in patients who had undergone laparoscopic colorectal surgery with an extraction-site incision. Extraction-site incisional hernia was diagnosed during clinical examination or imaging. Risk factors for extraction-site incisional hernia were analyzed.

Results

Two hundred and twenty-five patients were included. More than 80% of the patients had a malignant disease. Ninety-two patients (40.9%) underwent right colectomy. Midline extraction-site incision was used in 86 (38.2%) patients. After a mean follow-up of 2.4 years, 39 (17.3%) patients developed an extraction-site incisional hernia. Midline extraction-site incision was associated with incisional hernia when compared to transverse and Pfannenstiel incision (39.5% vs. 3.6%, OR 17.5, p < 0.001). Surgery to repair an extraction-site incisional hernia was also more frequent in the group of patients with a midline incision (10.5% vs. 1.4%, OR 8.0, p = 0.002). In the multivariate analysis, incisional hernia was associated with body mass index, high blood pressure, and midline incision.

Conclusions

Extraction-site incisional hernia was mainly related to midline incisions; therefore, midline incision should be avoided whenever possible. Studying prophylactic mesh closure for Pfannesnstiel or transverse incisions is needless, as these incisions have a low incisional hernia risk.
Literature
12.
go back to reference Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Chelala E, Dietz UA, Eker HH, El Nakadi I, Hauters P, Hidalgo Pascual M, Hoeferlin A, Klinge U, Montgomery A, Simmermacher RK, Simons MP, Smietanski M, Sommeling C, Tollens T, Vierendeels T, Kingsnorth A (2009) Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 13(4):407–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0518-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Chelala E, Dietz UA, Eker HH, El Nakadi I, Hauters P, Hidalgo Pascual M, Hoeferlin A, Klinge U, Montgomery A, Simmermacher RK, Simons MP, Smietanski M, Sommeling C, Tollens T, Vierendeels T, Kingsnorth A (2009) Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 13(4):407–414. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10029-009-0518-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Extraction-site incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: should we carry out a study about prophylactic mesh closure?
Authors
Oscar Cano-Valderrama
Rodrigo Sanz-López
Inmaculada Domínguez-Serrano
Jana Dziakova
Vanesa Catalán
Mikel Rojo
Mauricio García-Alonso
José M. Mugüerza
Antonio J. Torres
Publication date
01-09-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07194-y

Other articles of this Issue 9/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2020 Go to the issue