Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Clinical Oral Investigations
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 9/2015

01-12-2015 | Original Article

In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II CAD/CAM ceramic restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments

Authors: María José Sandoval, Giovanni Tommaso Rocca, Ivo Krejci, Michael Mandikos, Didier Dietschi

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 9/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

This in vitro study evaluated the influence of different composite bases and surface treatments on marginal and internal adaptation of class II CEREC CAD/CAM ceramic inlays, before and after simulated occlusal loading.

Methods

Thirty-two IPS Empress CAD class II inlays (MO or OD) (n = 8/group) were placed on third molars, with margins 1 mm below the cementum-enamel junction (CEJ), following different cavity treatments. These treatments were non-liner (control group), a flowable composite liner (Premise flow) sandblasted or treated with soft air abrasion and a restorative composite liner (Premise) sandblasted. The restorations were then luted with Premise. All specimens were submitted to 1,000,000 cycles with a 100-N eccentric load. The tooth restoration margins were analysed semi-quantitatively by SEM pre- and post-loading. The internal adaptation was also evaluated after test completion.

Results

The percentage of satisfactory marginal adaptation varied from 75 to 87 % pre-loading and 62 to 72 % post-loading in occlusal enamel, from 71 to 83 % pre-loading and 52 to 63 % post-loading in proximal enamel, and from 68 to 88 % pre-loading and 43 to 66 % post-loading in cervical dentin. There were no significant differences among groups. The percentages of satisfactory tooth–composite internal adaptation varied from 81 to 98 % in occlusal dentin, from 63 to 90 % in axial dentin, and from 71 to 84 % in cervical dentin without any statistical difference.

Conclusions

The results of the present study support the use of flowable or restorative composites as a liner underneath ceramic CAD/CAM inlays, producing marginal and internal adaptation which is not different from restorations placed directly on dentin. Soft air abrasion proved not to be different from sandblasting for treating cavities before cementation.

Clinical relevance

The results of this in vitro test validate the increasing use of a flowable base/liner underneath CAD/CAM ceramic inlays to optimise tissue conservation and clinical procedures; in this case, soft air abrasion is recommended as a pre-cementation step.
Literature
1.
Hickel R, Manhart J (2001) Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 3(1):45–64PubMed
2.
Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R (2004) Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 29(5):481–508PubMed
3.
Lu H, Stansbury JW, Dickens SH, Eichmiller FC, Bowman CN (2004) Probing the origins and control of shrinkage stress in dental resin-composites: I. Shrinkage stress characterization technique. J Mater Sci Mater Med 15(10):1097–1103CrossRefPubMed
4.
Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E (2004) Determinants of in vitro gap formation of resin composites. J Dent 32(2):109–115CrossRefPubMed
5.
Stavridakis MM, Lutz F, Johnston WM, Krejci I (2003) Linear displacement and force induced by polymerization shrinkage of resin-based restorative materials. Am J Dent 16(6):431–438PubMed
6.
Roulet JF, Salchow B, Wald M (1991) Margin analysis of posterior composites in vivo. Dent Mater 7(1):44–49CrossRefPubMed
7.
Davidson (1997) Factor influencing the quality of composite restorations; theory and practice. Bologna Int Symp 87–93
8.
Dietschi D, Scampa U, Campanile G, Holz J (1995) Marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect Class II composite resin restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Quintessence Int 26(2):127–138PubMed
9.
Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Folwaczny M, Hickel R (2004) Stabilization effects of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations in extended MOD cavities. J Adhes Dent 6(3):239–245PubMed
10.
Federlin M, Sipos C, Hiller KA, Thonemann B, Schmalz G (2005) Partial ceramic crowns. Influence of preparation design and luting material on margin integrity—a scanning electron microscopic study. Clin Oral Investig 9(1):8–17CrossRefPubMed
11.
Krifka S, Anthofer T, Fritzsch M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Federlin M (2009) Ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: influence of remaining cusp wall thickness on the marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro. Oper Dent 34(1):32–42CrossRefPubMed
12.
Dietschi D, Argente A, Krejci I (2013) Mandikos M In vitro performance of class I and II composite restorations: a literature review on nondestructive laboratory trials-part I. Oper Dent 38(5):E166–E181CrossRefPubMed
13.
Dietschi D, Argente A, Krejci I (2013) Mandikos M In vitro performanceof class I and II composite restorations: a literature review on nondestructive laboratory trials-part II. Oper Dent 38(5):E182–E200CrossRefPubMed
14.
Belli S, Inokoshi S, Ozer F, Pereira PN, Ogata M, Tagami J (2001) The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations. Oper Dent 26(1):70–75PubMed
15.
Dietschi D, Bindi G, Krejci I, Davidson C (2002) Marginal and internal adaptation of stratified compomer-composite Class II restorations. Oper Dent 27(5):500–509PubMed
16.
Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E (2002) Composite restorations: influence of flowable and self-curing resin composite linings on microleakage in vitro. Oper Dent 27(6):569–575PubMed
17.
Malmstrom HS, Schlueter M, Roach T, Moss ME (2002) Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations. Oper Dent 27(4):373–380PubMed
18.
Shortall AC, Baylis RL, Baylis MA, Grundy JR (1989) Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded Class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations, and direct composite resin inlays. Int J Prosthodont 2(3):217–223PubMed
19.
Dietschi D SR (1997) Adhesive metal free restorations: current concepts for the esthetic treatment of posterior teeth
20.
Iida K, Inokoshi S, Kurosaki N (2003) Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites. Oper Dent 28(4):445–452PubMed
21.
Dietschi D, Spreafico R (1998) Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 10(1):47–54, 22PubMed
22.
Dietschi D, Olsburgh S, Krejci I, Davidson C (2003) In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases. Eur J Oral Sci 111(1):73–80CrossRefPubMed
23.
Inokoshi S, Shimada Y, Fujitani M, Otsuki M, Shono T, Onoe N, Morigami M, Takatsu T (1995) Monkey pulpal response to adhesively luted indirect resin composite inlays. Oper Dent 20(3):111–118PubMed
24.
Inokoshi S, Fujitani M, Otsuki M, Sonoda H, Kitasako Y, Shimada Y, Tagami J (1998) Monkey pulpal responses to conventional and adhesive luting cements. Oper Dent 23(1):21–29PubMed
25.
Lutz E, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR (1986) Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 17(12):777–784PubMed
26.
Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Mortazavi F (1997) Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations. Oper Dent 22(1):21–29PubMed
27.
Ausiello P, Rengo S, Davidson CL, Watts DC (2004) Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study. Dent Mater 20(9):862–872, 28CrossRefPubMed
28.
Magne P, Knezevic A (2009) Simulated fatigue resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD/CAM overlay restorations on endodontically treated molars. Quintessence Int 40(2):125–133PubMed
29.
Scott JA, Strang R, Saunders WP (1992) The plane of fracture and shear bond strength of three composite inlay systems. Dent Mater 8(3):208–210CrossRefPubMed
30.
Krejci I, Fullemann J, Lutz F (1994) Clinical and long-term scanning electron microscopic studies of composite inlays. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 104(11):1351–1356PubMed
31.
Rodrigues SA Jr, Ferracane JL, Della Bona A (2009) Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 25(4):442–451CrossRefPubMed
32.
Rocca GT, Gregor L, Sandoval MJ, Krejci I, Dietschi D (2012) In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments. “Post-fatigue adaptation of indirect composite restorations”. Clin Oral Investig 16(5):1385–1393CrossRefPubMed
33.
Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Kramer N (2000) Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior. Oper Dent 25(6):459–465PubMed
34.
Hayashi M, Wilson NH, Yeung CA, Worthington HV (2003) Systematic review of ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig 7(1):8–19PubMed
35.
Molin MK, Karlsson SL (2000) A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Int J Prosthodont 13(3):194–200PubMed
36.
Thordrup M, Isidor F, Horsted-Bindslev P (2001) A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int 32(3):199–205PubMed
37.
Posselt A, Kerschbaum T (2003) Longevity of 2328 chairside Cerec inlays and onlays. Int J Comput Dent 6(3):231–248PubMed
38.
Sjogren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW (2004) A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite. Int J Prosthodont 17(2):241–246PubMed
39.
Kramer N, Frankenberger R (2005) Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. Dent Mater 21(3):262–271CrossRefPubMed
40.
Krejci I, Heinzmann JL, Lutz F (1990) The wear on enamel, amalgam and their enamel antagonists in a computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100(11):1285–1291PubMed
41.
Dietschi (2003) Evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of adhesive class II restorations. Dissertation, ACTA University of Amsterdam
42.
Ciucchi B, Bouillaguet S, Holz J, Pashley D (1995) Dentinal fluid dynamics in human teeth, in vivo. J Endod 21(4):191–194CrossRefPubMed
43.
Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M (1990) An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100(8):953–960PubMed
44.
Luescher B, Lutz F, Ochsenbein H, Muhlemann HR (1977) Microleakage and marginal adaptation in conventional and adhesive class II restoration. J Prosthet Dent 37(3):300–309CrossRefPubMed
45.
Roulet JF (1990) Degradation of dental polymers. 108–110
46.
Dietschi D, Moor L (1999) Evaluation of the marginal and internal adaptation of different ceramic and composite inlay systems after an in vitro fatigue test. J Adhes Dent 1(1):41–56PubMed
47.
Manhart J, Schmidt M, Chen HY, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R (2001) Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging. Oper Dent 26(4):357–366PubMed
48.
Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, Nikolaenko SA, Naumann M (2008) Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements. Dent Mater 24(2):185–191CrossRefPubMed
49.
Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Appelt A, Lohbauer U, Naumann M, Roggendorf MJ (2011) Chairside vs. labside ceramic inlays: effect of temporary restoration and adhesive luting on enamel cracks and marginal integrity. Dent Mater 27(9):892–898CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zaruba M, Gohring TN, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T (2012) Influence of a proximal margin elevation technique on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays. Acta Odontol Scand
51.
Bortolotto T, Onisor I, Krejci I (2007) Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning. Clin Oral Investig 11(1):35–43CrossRefPubMed
52.
Rocca GT, Krejci I (2007) Bonded indirect restorations for posterior teeth: from cavity preparation to provisionalization. Quintessence Int 38(5):371–379PubMed
53.
Magne PaS R (2012) Deep margin elevation: a paradigm shift. Am J Esthet Dent 2:86–96
54.
Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL (1990) Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 64(6):658–664CrossRefPubMed
55.
Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL (1990) Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 69(6):1240–1243CrossRefPubMed
56.
Ausiello P, Apicella A, Davidson CL (2002) Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations—a 3D finite element analysis. Dent Mater 18(4):295–303CrossRefPubMed
57.
Chuang SF, Jin YT, Liu JK, Chang CH, Shieh DB (2004) Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on Class II composite restorations. Oper Dent 29(3):301–308PubMed
58.
Dewaele M, Asmussen E, Devaux J, Leloup G (2006) Class II restorations: influence of a liner with rubbery qualities on the occurrence and size of cervical gaps. Eur J Oral Sci 114(6):535–541CrossRefPubMed
59.
Brannstrom M (1966) The hydrodynamics of the dental tubule and pulp fluid: its significance in relation to dentinal sensitivity. Annu Meet Am Inst Oral Biol 23:219PubMed
60.
Bertschinger C, Paul SJ, Luthy H, Scharer P (1996) Dual application of dentin bonding agents: effect on bond strength. Am J Dent 9(3):115–119PubMed
61.
Paul SJ, Scharer P (1997) The dual bonding technique: a modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 17(6):536–545PubMed
62.
Dietschi D, Herzfeld D (1998) In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci 106(6):1033–1042CrossRefPubMed
63.
Magne P, Douglas WH (1999) Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont 12(2):111–121PubMed
64.
Magne P, So WS, Cascione D (2007) Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement. J Prosthet Dent 98(3):166–174CrossRefPubMed
65.
Frankenberger R, Hehn J, Hajto J, Kramer N, Naumann M, Koch A, Roggendorf MJ (2012) Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro. Clin Oral Investig
66.
67.
Stavridakis MM, Krejci I, Magne P (2005) Immediate dentin sealing of onlay preparations: thickness of pre-cured Dentin Bonding Agent and effect of surface cleaning. Oper Dent 30(6):747–757PubMed
68.
Rocca GT, Krejci I (2007) Bonded indirect restorations for posterior teeth: the luting appointment. Quintessence Int 38(7):543–553PubMed
Metadata
Title
In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II CAD/CAM ceramic restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments
Authors
María José Sandoval
Giovanni Tommaso Rocca
Ivo Krejci
Michael Mandikos
Didier Dietschi
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 9/2015
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1449-9

Other articles of this Issue 9/2015

Clinical Oral Investigations 9/2015 Go to the issue

Original Article

Site-specific dental plaque pH in 13-year-old Thai schoolchildren

Erratum

Erratum to: Transverse dental arch relationship at 9 and 12 years in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with infant orthopedics: a randomized clinical trial (DUTCHCLEFT)

Original Article

Comparison of retreatment ability of full-sequence reciprocating instrumentation and 360° rotary instrumentation

Original Article

Interdevice agreement of eight equivalent dental color measurement devices

Original Article

Assessing the accuracy of autofluorescence, chemiluminescence and toluidine blue as diagnostic tools for oral potentially malignant disorders—a clinicopathological evaluation

Original Article

Inhibition of adherence of C. albicans to dental implants and cover screws by Cymbopogon nardus essential oil and citronellal