Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Improving the care pathway for women who request Caesarean section: an experience-based co-design study

Authors: Sara L. Kenyon, Nina Johns, Sandhya Duggal, Ruth Hewston, Nicola Gale

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Maternal request for Caesarean section is controversial and yet the NICE Caesarean section Guideline recommends that that if this is requested, following discussion of the risks and benefits, women should be supported in their choice. There was a desire to improve the pathway at Birmingham Women’s NHS Foundation Trust.

Methods

Experience-based co-design methodology uses service user and clinicians experiences collected using qualitative methods to jointly re-design services. Firstly semi-structured interviews were conducted to elicit the views and experiences of health care professionals and women who requested Caesarean section (with and without medical indication). Analysis identified key themes arising from the health care professionals’ interviews and ‘touch points’ (key moments or events related to the experience of care) arising from the interviews with women.. Separate workshops were then held with each group to ensure these resonated and to identify key areas for service improvement. At the first joint workshop a pathway using ‘audio clips’ demonstrating women’s agreed ‘touch points’ prompted discussion and joint working began to change the pathway. A final second workshop was held to agree changes to the pathway.

Results

Interviews were conducted with health care professionals (n = 22, 10 consultant obstetricians and 12 midwives) and women (n = 15). The women’s ‘touch points’ included repetition of request, delay in the decision for Caesarean section to be made, feeling judged, and that information was poor with similar findings identified from the health care professionals. Joint working resulted in a revised pathway for women who request Caesarean section.
Changes to the pathway for women as a result of the work include written information about ‘The way your baby may be born’ which is given to the woman followed by a discussion about mode of birth around the 16 week appointment. If the woman wishes to have a Caesarean section, referral is made to appropriate health care professionals (e.g., Consultant Midwife, counsellor) only if support and information would be useful. If Caesarean section is requested, woman is referred to a consultant obstetrician for an appointment at 20/40, with a decision by 28/40. Recording this in the notes minimises repeated challenge described by women. Final consent and timing of Caesarean section remain as recommended.

Conclusion

This has resulted in changes to the pathway agreed by a co-design process and which are acceptable to both health care professionals and women. Use of such methodologies should be considered more frequently when implementing service change.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fenwick J, Staff L, Gamble J, Creedy DK, Bayes S. Why do women request cesarean section in a normal, healthy first pregnancy? Midwifery. 2010;26:394–400.CrossRefPubMed Fenwick J, Staff L, Gamble J, Creedy DK, Bayes S. Why do women request cesarean section in a normal, healthy first pregnancy? Midwifery. 2010;26:394–400.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference McCourt C, Weaver J, Statham H, Beake S, Gamble J, Creedy D. Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature. Birth. 2007;34:65–79.CrossRefPubMed McCourt C, Weaver J, Statham H, Beake S, Gamble J, Creedy D. Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature. Birth. 2007;34:65–79.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kalish RB, McCullough LB, Chervenak FA. Decision-making about caesarean delivery. Lancet. 2006;367:883–5.CrossRefPubMed Kalish RB, McCullough LB, Chervenak FA. Decision-making about caesarean delivery. Lancet. 2006;367:883–5.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wiklund I, Edman G, Ryding EL, Andolf E. Expectations and experiences of childbirth in primiparae with caesarean section. BJOG. 2007;115:324–31.CrossRef Wiklund I, Edman G, Ryding EL, Andolf E. Expectations and experiences of childbirth in primiparae with caesarean section. BJOG. 2007;115:324–31.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wiklund I, Edman G, Andolf E. Cesarean section on maternal request: reasons for the request, self-estimated health, expectations, experience of birth and signs of depression among first-time mothers. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:451–6.CrossRefPubMed Wiklund I, Edman G, Andolf E. Cesarean section on maternal request: reasons for the request, self-estimated health, expectations, experience of birth and signs of depression among first-time mothers. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:451–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Green JM, Baston HA. Feeling in control during labor: concepts, correlates, and consequences. Birth. 2003;30:235–47.CrossRefPubMed Green JM, Baston HA. Feeling in control during labor: concepts, correlates, and consequences. Birth. 2003;30:235–47.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Melender HL. What constitutes a good childbirth? A qualitative study of pregnant Finnish women. J Midw Women’s Health. 2006;51:331–9.CrossRef Melender HL. What constitutes a good childbirth? A qualitative study of pregnant Finnish women. J Midw Women’s Health. 2006;51:331–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Karlström A, Nystedt A, Hildingsson I. A comparative study of the experience of childbirth between women who preferred and had a caesarean section and women who preferred and had a vaginal birth. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2011;2(3):93–9. Epub 2011 Apr 3.CrossRefPubMed Karlström A, Nystedt A, Hildingsson I. A comparative study of the experience of childbirth between women who preferred and had a caesarean section and women who preferred and had a vaginal birth. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2011;2(3):93–9. Epub 2011 Apr 3.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Humphrey C, Woodard F. (Eds.). (2010). User involvement in health care. John Wiley & Sons. Greenhalgh T, Humphrey C, Woodard F. (Eds.). (2010). User involvement in health care. John Wiley & Sons.
11.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Woodard F, Humphrey C. Where next for User Involvement? In: Greenhalgh T, Humphrey C, Woodard F, editors. User Involvement in Health Care. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. doi:10.1002/9781444325164.ch8. Greenhalgh T, Woodard F, Humphrey C. Where next for User Involvement? In: Greenhalgh T, Humphrey C, Woodard F, editors. User Involvement in Health Care. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. doi:10.​1002/​9781444325164.​ch8.
13.
go back to reference Piper D, Iedema R, Gray J, Verna R, Holmes L, Manning N. Utilizing Experience-based Co-design to improve the experience of patients accessing emergency departments in New South Wales public hospitals: an evaluation study. Health Serv Manage Res. 2012;25:162–72.CrossRefPubMed Piper D, Iedema R, Gray J, Verna R, Holmes L, Manning N. Utilizing Experience-based Co-design to improve the experience of patients accessing emergency departments in New South Wales public hospitals: an evaluation study. Health Serv Manage Res. 2012;25:162–72.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Tsianakas V, Robert G, Maben J, Richardson A, Dale C, Wiseman T. Implementing patient centred cancer care: using experience-based co-design to improve patient experience in breast and lung cancer services. J Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(11):2639–47.CrossRef Tsianakas V, Robert G, Maben J, Richardson A, Dale C, Wiseman T. Implementing patient centred cancer care: using experience-based co-design to improve patient experience in breast and lung cancer services. J Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(11):2639–47.CrossRef
15.
18.
go back to reference Donetto S, Tsianakas V, Robert G. Using Experience-based Co-design to improve the quality of healthcare: mapping where we are now and establishing future directions. London: King’s College London; 2014. Donetto S, Tsianakas V, Robert G. Using Experience-based Co-design to improve the quality of healthcare: mapping where we are now and establishing future directions. London: King’s College London; 2014.
19.
go back to reference Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):117.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):117.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Cotzias C, Paterson-Brown S, Fisk N. Obstetricians say yes to maternal request for elective caesarean section: a survey of current opinion. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;97:15–6.CrossRef Cotzias C, Paterson-Brown S, Fisk N. Obstetricians say yes to maternal request for elective caesarean section: a survey of current opinion. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;97:15–6.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Churchill H, Francome C. British midwives’ views on rising caesarean section rates. Br J Midwifery. 2009;17(12):774–8.CrossRef Churchill H, Francome C. British midwives’ views on rising caesarean section rates. Br J Midwifery. 2009;17(12):774–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Douché J, Carryer J. Caesarean section in the absence of need: a pathologising paradox for public health. Nurs Inq. 2009;18(2):143–53.CrossRef Douché J, Carryer J. Caesarean section in the absence of need: a pathologising paradox for public health. Nurs Inq. 2009;18(2):143–53.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Locock L, Robert G, Boaz A, Vougioukalou S, Shuldham C, Fielden J, et al. Testing accelerated experience-based co-design: a qualitative study of using a national archive of patient experience narrative interviews to promote rapid patient-centred service improvement. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2014;2(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/hsdr02040. Locock L, Robert G, Boaz A, Vougioukalou S, Shuldham C, Fielden J, et al. Testing accelerated experience-based co-design: a qualitative study of using a national archive of patient experience narrative interviews to promote rapid patient-centred service improvement. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2014;2(4). http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​3310/​hsdr02040.
Metadata
Title
Improving the care pathway for women who request Caesarean section: an experience-based co-design study
Authors
Sara L. Kenyon
Nina Johns
Sandhya Duggal
Ruth Hewston
Nicola Gale
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1134-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2016 Go to the issue