Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 11/2012

Open Access 01-11-2012 | Original Article

Implementing patient-centred cancer care: using experience-based co-design to improve patient experience in breast and lung cancer services

Authors: Vicki Tsianakas, Glenn Robert, Jill Maben, Alison Richardson, Catherine Dale, Theresa Wiseman

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 11/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this paper was to briefly describe how the experience-based co-design (EBCD) approach was used to identify and implement improvements in the experiences of breast and lung cancer patients before (1) comparing the issues identified as shaping patient experiences in the different tumour groups and (2) exploring participants' reflections on the value and key characteristics of this approach to improving patient experiences.

Methods

Fieldwork involved 36 filmed narrative patient interviews, 219 h of ethnographic observation, 63 staff interviews and a facilitated co-design change process involving patient and staff interviewees over a 12-month period. Four of the staff and five patients were interviewed about their views on the value of the approach and its key characteristics. The project setting was a large, inner-city cancer centre in England.

Results

Patients from both tumour groups generally identified similar issues (or 'touchpoints') that shaped their experience of care, although breast cancer patients identified a need for better information about side effects of treatment and end of treatment whereas lung cancer patients expressed a need for more information post-surgery. Although the issues were broadly similar, the particular improvement priorities patients and staff chose to work on together were tumour specific. Interviewees highlighted four characteristics of the EBCD approach as being key to its successful implementation: patient involvement, patient responsibility and empowerment, a sense of community, and a close connection between their experiences and the subsequent improvement priorities.

Conclusion

EBCD positions patients as active partners with staff in quality improvement. Breast and lung cancer patients identified similar touchpoints in their experiences, but these were translated into different improvement priorities for each tumour type. This is an important consideration when developing patient-centred cancer services across different tumour types.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Coulter A, Ellins J (2007) Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating and involving patients. Br Med J 335:24–7CrossRef Coulter A, Ellins J (2007) Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating and involving patients. Br Med J 335:24–7CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academy Press, Washington DC Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academy Press, Washington DC
5.
go back to reference Davies E, Cleary D (2005) Hearing the patient’s voice? Factors affecting the use of patient survey data in quality improvement. Qual Saf Health Care 14:428–432PubMedCrossRef Davies E, Cleary D (2005) Hearing the patient’s voice? Factors affecting the use of patient survey data in quality improvement. Qual Saf Health Care 14:428–432PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Stacey P, Bascavusoglu-Moreau E, Tether B (2011) Empathic service systems: 'designing' emotion in a cancer care service system. System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference Jan 2011pp. 1–10 Stacey P, Bascavusoglu-Moreau E, Tether B (2011) Empathic service systems: 'designing' emotion in a cancer care service system. System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference Jan 2011pp. 1–10
7.
go back to reference Wilcock PM, Stewart Brown GC, Bateson J, Carver J, Machin S (2003) Using patient stories to inspire quality improvement within the NHS Modernization Agency collaborative programmes. J Clin Nurs 12:422–430 Wilcock PM, Stewart Brown GC, Bateson J, Carver J, Machin S (2003) Using patient stories to inspire quality improvement within the NHS Modernization Agency collaborative programmes. J Clin Nurs 12:422–430
8.
go back to reference Bate P, Robert G (2006) Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Qual Saf Health Care 15(5):307–310PubMedCrossRef Bate P, Robert G (2006) Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Qual Saf Health Care 15(5):307–310PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Davies E, Shaller D, Edgman-Levitan S, Safran DG, Oftedahl G, Sakowski J, Cleary PD (2008) Evaluating the use of a modified CAHPS survey to support improvements in patient-centred care: lessons from a quality improvement collaborative. Health Expect 11(2):160–76PubMedCrossRef Davies E, Shaller D, Edgman-Levitan S, Safran DG, Oftedahl G, Sakowski J, Cleary PD (2008) Evaluating the use of a modified CAHPS survey to support improvements in patient-centred care: lessons from a quality improvement collaborative. Health Expect 11(2):160–76PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Forbat L, Cayless S, Knighting K, Cornwell J, Kearney N (2009) Engaging patients in health care: an empirical study of the role of engagement on attitudes and action. Patient Educ Couns 74:84–90PubMedCrossRef Forbat L, Cayless S, Knighting K, Cornwell J, Kearney N (2009) Engaging patients in health care: an empirical study of the role of engagement on attitudes and action. Patient Educ Couns 74:84–90PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Piper D, Iedema R (2010) Emergency Department Co-Design Program 1 Stage 2 Evaluation Report. Centre for Health Communication (UTS) and NSW Health, Sydney Piper D, Iedema R (2010) Emergency Department Co-Design Program 1 Stage 2 Evaluation Report. Centre for Health Communication (UTS) and NSW Health, Sydney
12.
go back to reference Coulter A, Fitzpatrick P, Cornwell J (2009) The point of care—measures of patients' experience in hospital: Purpose, methods and uses. The King’s Fund, London Coulter A, Fitzpatrick P, Cornwell J (2009) The point of care—measures of patients' experience in hospital: Purpose, methods and uses. The King’s Fund, London
13.
go back to reference Goodrich J, Cornwell J (2008) Seeing the person in the patient. The King’s Fund, London Goodrich J, Cornwell J (2008) Seeing the person in the patient. The King’s Fund, London
15.
go back to reference Bate SP, Robert G (2007) Towards more user-centric organisational development: lessons from a case study of experience-based design. J Appl Behav Sci 43(1):41–66CrossRef Bate SP, Robert G (2007) Towards more user-centric organisational development: lessons from a case study of experience-based design. J Appl Behav Sci 43(1):41–66CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Iedema R, Merrick E, Piper D, Walsh J (2008) Emergency department co-design stage 1 evaluation—report to health services performance improvement branch, NSW Health, Centre for Health Communication. University of Technology, Sydney Iedema R, Merrick E, Piper D, Walsh J (2008) Emergency department co-design stage 1 evaluation—report to health services performance improvement branch, NSW Health, Centre for Health Communication. University of Technology, Sydney
17.
go back to reference Reason P, Bradbury H (Ed.) (2001) The SAGE handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice. 1st Edition. Sage, London Reason P, Bradbury H (Ed.) (2001) The SAGE handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice. 1st Edition. Sage, London
18.
go back to reference Dewar B, Mackay R, Smith S, Pullin S, Tocher R (2010) Use of emotional touchpoints as a method of tapping into the experience of receiving compassionate care in a hospital setting. J Res Nurs 15(1):29–41CrossRef Dewar B, Mackay R, Smith S, Pullin S, Tocher R (2010) Use of emotional touchpoints as a method of tapping into the experience of receiving compassionate care in a hospital setting. J Res Nurs 15(1):29–41CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pope C, van Royen P, Baker R (2002) Qualitative methods in research on healthcare quality. Qual Saf Health Care 11:148–152PubMedCrossRef Pope C, van Royen P, Baker R (2002) Qualitative methods in research on healthcare quality. Qual Saf Health Care 11:148–152PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Farr M (2011) Evaluation report of the Patient Centred Care Project. King’s Fund, London Farr M (2011) Evaluation report of the Patient Centred Care Project. King’s Fund, London
22.
go back to reference Bate P, Robert G (2007) Bringing user experience to healthcare improvement: The concepts, methods and practices of experience-based design. Radcliffe, Oxon Bate P, Robert G (2007) Bringing user experience to healthcare improvement: The concepts, methods and practices of experience-based design. Radcliffe, Oxon
23.
go back to reference Iedema R, Merrick E, Piper D, Britton K, Gray J, Verma R, Manning N (2010) Co-design as discursive practice in emergency health services: the architecture of deliberation. J Appl Behav Sci 46:73–91CrossRef Iedema R, Merrick E, Piper D, Britton K, Gray J, Verma R, Manning N (2010) Co-design as discursive practice in emergency health services: the architecture of deliberation. J Appl Behav Sci 46:73–91CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kaplan HC, Brady PW, Dritz MC, Hooper DK, Linam W, Froehle CM et al (2010) The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: a systematic review of the literature. Milbank Q 88:500–559PubMedCrossRef Kaplan HC, Brady PW, Dritz MC, Hooper DK, Linam W, Froehle CM et al (2010) The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: a systematic review of the literature. Milbank Q 88:500–559PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Øvretveit J (2011) Understanding the conditions for improvement: research to discover which context influences affect improvement success. Br Med J Qual Saf 20:i18CrossRef Øvretveit J (2011) Understanding the conditions for improvement: research to discover which context influences affect improvement success. Br Med J Qual Saf 20:i18CrossRef
26.
go back to reference McDermott AM, Keating MA (2012) Making service improvement happen: the importance of social context. J Appl Behav Sci 48(1):62–92CrossRef McDermott AM, Keating MA (2012) Making service improvement happen: the importance of social context. J Appl Behav Sci 48(1):62–92CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Farrell C, Lewis J (2000) The cancer experience. The National Centre for Social Research, London Farrell C, Lewis J (2000) The cancer experience. The National Centre for Social Research, London
30.
go back to reference Bradwell P, Marr S, in co-operation with PricewaterhouseCoopers (2008) Making the most of collaboration. An international survey of public service co-design. Demos Report No. 23, London. Bradwell P, Marr S, in co-operation with PricewaterhouseCoopers (2008) Making the most of collaboration. An international survey of public service co-design. Demos Report No. 23, London.
31.
go back to reference Wolstenholme D, Cobb MR, Bowen S, Wright P, Dearden A (2010) Design-led service improvement for older people. Australas Med J 3(8):465–470CrossRef Wolstenholme D, Cobb MR, Bowen S, Wright P, Dearden A (2010) Design-led service improvement for older people. Australas Med J 3(8):465–470CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Abma TA, Nierse NJ, Widdershoven GAM (2009) Patients as partners in responsive research: methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams. Qual Health Res 19:401PubMedCrossRef Abma TA, Nierse NJ, Widdershoven GAM (2009) Patients as partners in responsive research: methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams. Qual Health Res 19:401PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Implementing patient-centred cancer care: using experience-based co-design to improve patient experience in breast and lung cancer services
Authors
Vicki Tsianakas
Glenn Robert
Jill Maben
Alison Richardson
Catherine Dale
Theresa Wiseman
Publication date
01-11-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 11/2012
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1470-3

Other articles of this Issue 11/2012

Supportive Care in Cancer 11/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine