Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2007

01-08-2007

Implications of Transaxillary Breast Augmentation: Lifetime Probability of Breast Cancer Development and Sentinel Node Mapping Interference

Authors: Arturo Prado, M.D., Patricio Andrades, M.D., Patricio Leniz, M.D.

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 4/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

After the “fifth-generation” breast implants with ultracohesive silicone gel technology are introduced, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will sooner or later retire the ban on the use of these devices in the United States. When this happens, the plastic surgery community must be prepared to face a massive demand for reoperations to change saline-filled breast implants because cohesive gel devices have the potential to provide a more natural breast shape, to minimize the risk of postoperative rippling, and to provide a greater degree of safety if the implant loses its integrity. Despite these advantages and extensive use throughout the rest of the world during the ban in the United States, silicone implants also have disadvantages. One drawback is that transaxillary breast augmentation with more “rigid” gel-filled implants may produce trauma to the armpit, may interfere with sentinel node mapping for breast cancer treatment, and may have future medicolegal implications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jakub J, Ebert M, Cantor A, Gardner M, Reintgen D, Dupont E, Cox CE, Shons AR: Breast cancer in patients with prior augmentation: Presentation, stage, and lymphatic mapping. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1737, 2004PubMedCrossRef Jakub J, Ebert M, Cantor A, Gardner M, Reintgen D, Dupont E, Cox CE, Shons AR: Breast cancer in patients with prior augmentation: Presentation, stage, and lymphatic mapping. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1737, 2004PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Marchal F, Rauch P, Morel O, Mayer JC, Olivier P, Leroux A, Verhaeghe JL, Guillemin F: Results of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for breast cancer are predictive of identification of axillary sentinel lymph nodes. World J Surg 30:55, 2006PubMedCrossRef Marchal F, Rauch P, Morel O, Mayer JC, Olivier P, Leroux A, Verhaeghe JL, Guillemin F: Results of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for breast cancer are predictive of identification of axillary sentinel lymph nodes. World J Surg 30:55, 2006PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Munhoz AM, Aldrighi C, Buschpiegel C, Ono C, Montag E, Fells K, Arruda E, Sturtz G, Kovac P, Filassi JR, Gemperli R, Ferreira MC: The feasibility of sentinel lymph node detection in patients with previous transaxillary implant breast augmentation: preliminary results. Aesth Plast Surg 29:163, 2005CrossRef Munhoz AM, Aldrighi C, Buschpiegel C, Ono C, Montag E, Fells K, Arruda E, Sturtz G, Kovac P, Filassi JR, Gemperli R, Ferreira MC: The feasibility of sentinel lymph node detection in patients with previous transaxillary implant breast augmentation: preliminary results. Aesth Plast Surg 29:163, 2005CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Reintgen et al: Sentinel lymph node sampling accurately stages breast cancer. JAMA 276:1818–1822, 1996 Reintgen et al: Sentinel lymph node sampling accurately stages breast cancer. JAMA 276:1818–1822, 1996
5.
go back to reference Tanis PJ, Nieweg OE, Valdes Olmos RA, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ, Hoefnagel CA, Kroon BB: Impact of nonaxillary sentinel node biopsy on staging and treatment of breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 87:705, 2002PubMedCrossRef Tanis PJ, Nieweg OE, Valdes Olmos RA, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ, Hoefnagel CA, Kroon BB: Impact of nonaxillary sentinel node biopsy on staging and treatment of breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 87:705, 2002PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Implications of Transaxillary Breast Augmentation: Lifetime Probability of Breast Cancer Development and Sentinel Node Mapping Interference
Authors
Arturo Prado, M.D.
Patricio Andrades, M.D.
Patricio Leniz, M.D.
Publication date
01-08-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 4/2007
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0131-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2007

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2007 Go to the issue