Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 12/2021

01-12-2021 | Perspective

Implementation of peer learning conferences throughout a multi-site abdominal radiology practice

Authors: Andrew W. Bowman, Nelly Tan, Daniel A. Adamo, Frederick Chen, Sudhakar K. Venkatesh, Deborah A. Baumgarten

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 12/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To initiate a peer learning conference for our abdominal radiology division across multiple geographically separated sites and different time zones, and to determine radiologist preference for peer learning versus traditional score-based peer review.

Methods

We implemented a monthly peer learning videoconference for our abdominal radiology division. Surveys regarding radiologist opinion regarding traditional peer review and the new peer learning conferences were conducted before and after 6 months of conferences.

Results

Peer learning conferences were well attended across our multiple sites, with an average of 43 participants per conference. Radiologist opinion regarding peer review was poor, with survey radiologists responding positively to only 1 out of 12 process questions. Opinion regarding peer learning was extremely favorable, with radiologists responding positively to 12 out of the same 12 process questions. After 6 months of peer learning conferences, 87.9% of surveyed radiologists wished to continue them in some fashion, and no one preferred to return to score-based peer review alone.

Conclusion

We successfully implemented a peer learning conference for our abdominal radiology division spread out over multiple geographic sites. Our radiologists strongly preferred peer learning conferences over our traditional peer review system for quality control.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference James JT. (2013) A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care. J Patient Saf 9:122-128.CrossRef James JT. (2013) A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care. J Patient Saf 9:122-128.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Graber ML (2013) The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ Qual Saf 22 Suppl 2:ii21-ii27. Graber ML (2013) The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ Qual Saf 22 Suppl 2:ii21-ii27.
3.
go back to reference Itri JN, Tappouni RR, McEachern RO, et al. (2018) Fundamentals of Diagnostic Error in Imaging. Radiographics 38:1845-1865.CrossRef Itri JN, Tappouni RR, McEachern RO, et al. (2018) Fundamentals of Diagnostic Error in Imaging. Radiographics 38:1845-1865.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Larson DB, Donnely LF, Podberesky DJ, et al. (2017) Peer feedback, learning, and improvement: Answering the call of the Institute of Medicine report on diagnostic error. Radiology 283:231-241.CrossRef Larson DB, Donnely LF, Podberesky DJ, et al. (2017) Peer feedback, learning, and improvement: Answering the call of the Institute of Medicine report on diagnostic error. Radiology 283:231-241.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Borgstede JP, Lewis RS, Bhargavan M, et al. (2004) RADPEER quality assurance program: A multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates. J Am Coll Radiol 1:59-65.CrossRef Borgstede JP, Lewis RS, Bhargavan M, et al. (2004) RADPEER quality assurance program: A multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates. J Am Coll Radiol 1:59-65.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Soffa DJ, Lewis RS, Sunshine JH, et al. (2004) Disagreement in interpretation: A method for the development of benchmarks for quality assurance in imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 1:212-217.CrossRef Soffa DJ, Lewis RS, Sunshine JH, et al. (2004) Disagreement in interpretation: A method for the development of benchmarks for quality assurance in imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 1:212-217.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Larson DB, Broder JC, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, et al. (2020) Transitioning from peer review to peer learning: Report of the 2020 Peer Learning Summit. J Am Coll Radiol 17:1499-1508.CrossRef Larson DB, Broder JC, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, et al. (2020) Transitioning from peer review to peer learning: Report of the 2020 Peer Learning Summit. J Am Coll Radiol 17:1499-1508.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Larson DB, Nance JJ. (2011) Rethinking peer review: What aviation can teach radiology about performance improvement. Radiology 259:626-32.CrossRef Larson DB, Nance JJ. (2011) Rethinking peer review: What aviation can teach radiology about performance improvement. Radiology 259:626-32.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bender LC, Linnau KF, Meier EN, et al. (2012) Interrater agreement in the evaluation of discrepant imaging findings with the RADPEER system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:1320-1327.CrossRef Bender LC, Linnau KF, Meier EN, et al. (2012) Interrater agreement in the evaluation of discrepant imaging findings with the RADPEER system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:1320-1327.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Eisenberg RL, Cunningham ML, Siewert B, et al. (2014) Survey of faculty perceptions regarding a peer review system. J Am Coll Radiol 11:397-401.CrossRef Eisenberg RL, Cunningham ML, Siewert B, et al. (2014) Survey of faculty perceptions regarding a peer review system. J Am Coll Radiol 11:397-401.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Abujudeh H, Pyatt RS, Bruno MA, et al. (2014) RADPEER peer review: Relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward. J Am Coll Radiol 11:899-904.CrossRef Abujudeh H, Pyatt RS, Bruno MA, et al. (2014) RADPEER peer review: Relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward. J Am Coll Radiol 11:899-904.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Liao M, Tan N. (2020) Collective intelligence of peer learning: Promoting culture of learning and improvement among radiologists. Curr Prob Diag Radiol Oct 5, S0363–0188(20)30193–6. Liao M, Tan N. (2020) Collective intelligence of peer learning: Promoting culture of learning and improvement among radiologists. Curr Prob Diag Radiol Oct 5, S0363–0188(20)30193–6.
13.
go back to reference Armstrong V, Tan N, Sekhar A, et al. (2020) Peer learning through multi-institutional web-based case conferences: Perceived value (and challenges) from abdominal, cardiothoracic, and musculoskeletal radiology case conference participants. Acad Radiol 27:1641-1646.CrossRef Armstrong V, Tan N, Sekhar A, et al. (2020) Peer learning through multi-institutional web-based case conferences: Perceived value (and challenges) from abdominal, cardiothoracic, and musculoskeletal radiology case conference participants. Acad Radiol 27:1641-1646.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Goldberg-Stein S, Frigini LA, Long S, et al. (2017) ACR RADPEER committee white paper with 2016 updates: Revised scoring system, new classifications, self-review, and subspecialized reports. J Am Coll Radiol 14:1080-1086.CrossRef Goldberg-Stein S, Frigini LA, Long S, et al. (2017) ACR RADPEER committee white paper with 2016 updates: Revised scoring system, new classifications, self-review, and subspecialized reports. J Am Coll Radiol 14:1080-1086.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sharpe RE, Huffman RI, Congdon RG, et al. (2018) Implementation of a peer learning program replacing score-based peer review in a multispecialty integrated practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 211:949-956.CrossRef Sharpe RE, Huffman RI, Congdon RG, et al. (2018) Implementation of a peer learning program replacing score-based peer review in a multispecialty integrated practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 211:949-956.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Donnelly LF, Larson DB, Heller RE, et al. (2018) Practical suggestions on how to move from peer review to peer learning. AJR Am J Roentgenol 210:578-582.CrossRef Donnelly LF, Larson DB, Heller RE, et al. (2018) Practical suggestions on how to move from peer review to peer learning. AJR Am J Roentgenol 210:578-582.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Implementation of peer learning conferences throughout a multi-site abdominal radiology practice
Authors
Andrew W. Bowman
Nelly Tan
Daniel A. Adamo
Frederick Chen
Sudhakar K. Venkatesh
Deborah A. Baumgarten
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 12/2021
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03114-8

Other articles of this Issue 12/2021

Abdominal Radiology 12/2021 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.