Published in:
01-10-2017
Impacts of a care process model and inpatient electrophysiology service on cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections: a preliminary evaluation
Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Issue 1/2017
Login to get accessAbstract
Purpose
Cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection (CIEDI) rates are rising. To improve outcomes, our institution developed an online care process model (CPM) and a specialized inpatient heart rhythm service (HRS).
Methods
This retrospective review compared hospital length of stay (LOS), mortality, and times to subspecialty consultation and procedures before and after CPM and HRS availability.
Results
CPM use was associated with shortened time to surgical consultation (median 2 days post-CPM vs. 3 days pre-CPM, p = 0.0152), pocket closure (median 4 vs. 5 days, p < 0.0001), and days to new CIED implant (median 7 vs. 8 days, p = 0.0126). Post-HRS patients were more likely to have a surgical consultation (OR 7.01, 95% CI 1.56–31.5, p = 0.011) and shortened time to pocket closure (coefficient − 2.21 days, 95% CI − 3.33 to − 1.09, p < 0.001), compared to pre-HRS.
Conclusions
The CPM and HRS were associated with favorable outcomes, but further integration of CPM features into hospital workflow is needed.