Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2018

01-08-2018 | Concise Research Reports

Impact of Teaching Intensity and Sociodemographic Characteristics on CMS Hospital Compare Quality Ratings

Authors: Wenshuai Wan, MD, C. Jason Liang, PhD, Richard Duszak Jr., MD, Christoph I. Lee, MD, MS

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 8/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

In July 2016, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released “Hospital Compare” ratings for 3576 U.S. hospitals to help consumers compare hospitals’ quality of care, which was distilled into a single overall rating between 1 and 5 stars based on 57 process- and outcomes-based clinical measures.1,2 A recent publication found differences in overall ratings by characteristics including a hospital’s teaching status.3 Professional groups (e.g., the American Hospital Association) have expressed concern that the current ratings scheme unfairly penalizes teaching hospitals, especially those serving low-income and otherwise disadvantaged patient populations.4
Literature
3.
go back to reference DeLancey JO, Softcheck J, Chung JW. Associations Between Hospital Characteristics, Measure Reporting, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings. JAMA. 2017;317(19):2015–2017.CrossRef DeLancey JO, Softcheck J, Chung JW. Associations Between Hospital Characteristics, Measure Reporting, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings. JAMA. 2017;317(19):2015–2017.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fiscella K, Burstin HR, Nerenz DR. Quality measures and sociodemographic risk factors: to adjust or not to adjust. JAMA. 2014;312(24):2615–6.CrossRef Fiscella K, Burstin HR, Nerenz DR. Quality measures and sociodemographic risk factors: to adjust or not to adjust. JAMA. 2014;312(24):2615–6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact of Teaching Intensity and Sociodemographic Characteristics on CMS Hospital Compare Quality Ratings
Authors
Wenshuai Wan, MD
C. Jason Liang, PhD
Richard Duszak Jr., MD
Christoph I. Lee, MD, MS
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4442-6

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2018 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.