Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 4/2015

Open Access 01-04-2015 | Topic Paper

Impact of pulse duration on Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy: fragmentation and dusting performance

Authors: Markus J. Bader, Thomas Pongratz, Wael Khoder, Christian G. Stief, Thomas Herrmann, Udo Nagele, Ronald Sroka

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

In vitro investigations of Ho:YAG laser-induced stone fragmentation were performed to identify potential impacts of different pulse durations on stone fragmentation characteristics.

Materials and methods

A Ho:YAG laser system (Swiss LaserClast, EMS S.A., Nyon, Switzerland) with selectable long or short pulse mode was tested with regard to its fragmentation and laser hardware compatibility properties. The pulse duration is depending on the specific laser parameters. Fragmentation tests (hand-held, hands-free, single-pulse-induced crater) on artificial BEGO stones were performed under reproducible experimental conditions (fibre sizes: 365 and 200 µm; laser settings: 10 W through combinations of 0.5, 1, 2 J/pulse and 20, 10, 5 Hz, respectively).

Results

Differences in fragmentation rates between the two pulse duration regimes were detected with statistical significance for defined settings. Hand-held and motivated Ho:YAG laser-assisted fragmentation of BEGO stones showed no significant difference between short pulse mode and long pulse mode, neither in fragmentation rates nor in number of fragments and fragment sizes. Similarly, the results of the hands-free fragmentation tests (with and without anti-repulsion device) showed no statistical differences between long pulse and short pulse modes.

Conclusion

The study showed that fragmentation rates for long and short pulse durations at identical power settings remain at a comparable level. Longer holmium laser pulse duration reduces stone pushback. Therefore, longer laser pulses may result in better clinical outcome of laser lithotripsy and more convenient handling during clinical use without compromising fragmentation effectiveness.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Bagley DH (2004) Ureteroscopic surgery: changing times and perspectives. Urol Clin N Am 31(1):1–4CrossRef Bagley DH (2004) Ureteroscopic surgery: changing times and perspectives. Urol Clin N Am 31(1):1–4CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chow GK et al (2003) Ureteroscopy: effect of technology and technique on clinical practice. J Urol 170(1):99–102CrossRefPubMed Chow GK et al (2003) Ureteroscopy: effect of technology and technique on clinical practice. J Urol 170(1):99–102CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kauer PC et al (2005) Present practice and treatment strategies in endourological stone management: results of a survey of the European Society of Uro-technology (ESUT). Eur Urol 48(2):182–188CrossRefPubMed Kauer PC et al (2005) Present practice and treatment strategies in endourological stone management: results of a survey of the European Society of Uro-technology (ESUT). Eur Urol 48(2):182–188CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Marks AJ, Teichman JM (2007) Lasers in clinical urology: state of the art and new horizons. World J Urol 25(3):227–233CrossRefPubMed Marks AJ, Teichman JM (2007) Lasers in clinical urology: state of the art and new horizons. World J Urol 25(3):227–233CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sofer M et al (2002) Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi in 598 patients. J Urol 167(1):31–34CrossRefPubMed Sofer M et al (2002) Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi in 598 patients. J Urol 167(1):31–34CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Chawla SN et al (2008) Effectiveness of high-frequency holmium:YAG laser stone fragmentation: the “popcorn effect”. J Endourol 22(4):645–650CrossRefPubMed Chawla SN et al (2008) Effectiveness of high-frequency holmium:YAG laser stone fragmentation: the “popcorn effect”. J Endourol 22(4):645–650CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kronenberg P, Traxer O (2014) In vitro fragmentation efficiency of holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG) laser lithotripsy—a comprehensive study encompassing different frequencies, pulse energies, total power levels and laser fibre diameters. BJU Int 114(2):261–267. dol:10.1111/bju.12567 Kronenberg P, Traxer O (2014) In vitro fragmentation efficiency of holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG) laser lithotripsy—a comprehensive study encompassing different frequencies, pulse energies, total power levels and laser fibre diameters. BJU Int 114(2):261–267. dol:10.​1111/​bju.​12567
11.
go back to reference Wezel F et al (2010) Effect of pulse energy, frequency and length on holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser fragmentation efficiency in non-floating artificial urinary calculi. J Endourol 24(7):1135–1140CrossRefPubMed Wezel F et al (2010) Effect of pulse energy, frequency and length on holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser fragmentation efficiency in non-floating artificial urinary calculi. J Endourol 24(7):1135–1140CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Finley DS et al (2005) Effect of holmium:YAG laser pulse width on lithotripsy retropulsion in vitro. J Endourol 19(8):1041–1044CrossRefPubMed Finley DS et al (2005) Effect of holmium:YAG laser pulse width on lithotripsy retropulsion in vitro. J Endourol 19(8):1041–1044CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kalra P, Le NB, Bagley D (2007) Effect of pulse width on object movement in vitro using holmium:YAG laser. J Endourol 21(2):228–231CrossRefPubMed Kalra P, Le NB, Bagley D (2007) Effect of pulse width on object movement in vitro using holmium:YAG laser. J Endourol 21(2):228–231CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Sroka R et al (2012) In vitro investigations of repulsion during laser lithotripsy using a pendulum set-up. Lasers Med Sci 27(3):637–643CrossRefPubMed Sroka R et al (2012) In vitro investigations of repulsion during laser lithotripsy using a pendulum set-up. Lasers Med Sci 27(3):637–643CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bader MJ et al (2011) Impact of collateral damage to endourologic tools during laser lithotripsy–in vitro comparison of three different clinical laser systems. J Endourol 25(4):667–672CrossRefPubMed Bader MJ et al (2011) Impact of collateral damage to endourologic tools during laser lithotripsy–in vitro comparison of three different clinical laser systems. J Endourol 25(4):667–672CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Opondo D et al (2014) Standardization of patient outcomes reporting in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 28(7):767–774CrossRefPubMed Opondo D et al (2014) Standardization of patient outcomes reporting in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 28(7):767–774CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rebuck DA et al (2011) The natural history of renal stone fragments following ureteroscopy. Urology 77(3):564–568CrossRefPubMed Rebuck DA et al (2011) The natural history of renal stone fragments following ureteroscopy. Urology 77(3):564–568CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Patel N et al (2014) Accuracy of endoscopic intraoperative assessment of urologic stone size. J Endourol 28(5):582–586CrossRefPubMed Patel N et al (2014) Accuracy of endoscopic intraoperative assessment of urologic stone size. J Endourol 28(5):582–586CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Impact of pulse duration on Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy: fragmentation and dusting performance
Authors
Markus J. Bader
Thomas Pongratz
Wael Khoder
Christian G. Stief
Thomas Herrmann
Udo Nagele
Ronald Sroka
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1429-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

World Journal of Urology 4/2015 Go to the issue