Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 3/2021

01-03-2021 | Original Research

Impact of Patient Access to Online VA Notes on Healthcare Utilization and Clinician Documentation: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Authors: Amanda C. Blok, Daniel J. Amante, Timothy P. Hogan, Rajani S. Sadasivam, Stephanie L. Shimada, Susan Woods, Kim M. Nazi, Thomas K. Houston

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In an effort to foster patient engagement, some healthcare systems provide their patients with open notes, enabling them to access their clinical notes online. In January 2013, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) implemented online access to clinical notes (“VA Notes”) through the Blue Button feature of its patient portal.

Objective

To measure the association of online patient access to clinical notes with changes in healthcare utilization and clinician documentation behaviors.

Design

A retrospective cohort study.

Patients

Patients accessing My HealtheVet (MHV), the VA’s online patient portal, between July 2011 and January 2015.

Main Measures

Use of healthcare services (primary care clinic visits and online electronic secure messaging), and characteristics of physician clinical documentation (readability of notes).

Key Results

Among 882,575 unique portal users, those who accessed clinical notes (16.2%; N = 122,972) were younger, more racially homogenous (white), and less likely to be financially vulnerable. Compared with non-users, Notes users more frequently used the secure messaging feature on the portal (mean of 2.6 messages (SD 7.0) v. 0.87 messages (SD 3.3) in January–July 2013), but their higher use of secure messaging began prior to VA Notes implementation, and thus was not temporally related to the implementation. When comparing clinic visit rates pre- and post-implementation, Notes users had a small but significant increase in rate of 0.36 primary care clinic visits (2012 v. 2013) compared to portal users who did not view their Notes (p = 0.01). At baseline, the mean reading ease of primary care clinical notes was 53.8 (SD 10.1) and did not improve after implementation of VA Notes.

Conclusions

VA Notes users were different than patients with portal access who did not view their notes online, and they had higher rates of healthcare service use prior to and after VA Notes implementation. Opportunities exist to improve clinical note access and readability.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bodenheimer T, Chen E, Bennett HD. Confronting the growing burden of chronic disease: can the US health care workforce do the job? Health Affairs. 2009; 28(1): 64-74.CrossRef Bodenheimer T, Chen E, Bennett HD. Confronting the growing burden of chronic disease: can the US health care workforce do the job? Health Affairs. 2009; 28(1): 64-74.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Coleman K, et al. Evidence on the chronic care model in the new millennium. Health Affairs. 2009; 28(1): 75-85.CrossRef Coleman K, et al. Evidence on the chronic care model in the new millennium. Health Affairs. 2009; 28(1): 75-85.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services. Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program. Final rule. Federal register, 2010. 75(144): 44313. Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services. Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program. Final rule. Federal register, 2010. 75(144): 44313.
4.
go back to reference Vydra TP, et al. Diffusion and Use of Tethered Personal Health Records in Primary Care. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2015; 12: 1c.PubMedPubMedCentral Vydra TP, et al. Diffusion and Use of Tethered Personal Health Records in Primary Care. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2015; 12: 1c.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Department of Health and Human Services. 2016 Report to Congress on Health IT Progress: Examining the HITECH Era and the Future of Health IT. 2016. Department of Health and Human Services. 2016 Report to Congress on Health IT Progress: Examining the HITECH Era and the Future of Health IT. 2016.
6.
go back to reference Nazi KM, et al. Consumer health informatics: engaging and empowering patients and families, in Clinical Informatics Study Guide. 2016; Springer. p. 459-500. Nazi KM, et al. Consumer health informatics: engaging and empowering patients and families, in Clinical Informatics Study Guide. 2016; Springer. p. 459-500.
7.
go back to reference Xerox Healthcare Services, S.O, Annual Xerox EHR Survey: Americans Open to Viewing Test Results, Handling Healthcare Online. 2014 Xerox Healthcare Services, S.O, Annual Xerox EHR Survey: Americans Open to Viewing Test Results, Handling Healthcare Online. 2014
8.
go back to reference Families NPFWA. New Survey: Patients Increasingly Value Electronic Health Records; Eager for More Access and Features. 2014. Families NPFWA. New Survey: Patients Increasingly Value Electronic Health Records; Eager for More Access and Features. 2014.
9.
go back to reference Nazi KM, et al. Evaluating patient access to Electronic Health Records: results from a survey of veterans. Med Care. 2013; 51(3 Suppl 1): p. S52-6.CrossRef Nazi KM, et al. Evaluating patient access to Electronic Health Records: results from a survey of veterans. Med Care. 2013; 51(3 Suppl 1): p. S52-6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Woods SS, et al. Patient experiences with full electronic access to health records and clinical notes through the My HealtheVet Personal Health Record Pilot: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15(3): e65.CrossRef Woods SS, et al. Patient experiences with full electronic access to health records and clinical notes through the My HealtheVet Personal Health Record Pilot: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15(3): e65.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Leveille SG, et al. Evaluating the impact of patients’ online access to doctors’ visit notes: designing and executing the OpenNotes project. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2012; 12(1): p. 1.CrossRef Leveille SG, et al. Evaluating the impact of patients’ online access to doctors’ visit notes: designing and executing the OpenNotes project. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2012; 12(1): p. 1.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Delbanco T, et al., Open notes: doctors and patients signing on. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 153(2): 121-5.CrossRef Delbanco T, et al., Open notes: doctors and patients signing on. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 153(2): 121-5.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Delbanco T, et al. Inviting patients to read their doctors’ notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157(7): 461-70.CrossRef Delbanco T, et al. Inviting patients to read their doctors’ notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157(7): 461-70.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nazi KM, et al. VA OpenNotes: exploring the experiences of early patient adopters with access to clinical notes. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2014: amiajnl-2014-003144. Nazi KM, et al. VA OpenNotes: exploring the experiences of early patient adopters with access to clinical notes. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2014: amiajnl-2014-003144.
17.
go back to reference Olenick M., Flowers M, Diaz VJ. US veterans and their unique issues: enhancing health care professional awareness. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015; 6: 635-9.CrossRef Olenick M., Flowers M, Diaz VJ. US veterans and their unique issues: enhancing health care professional awareness. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015; 6: 635-9.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kazis LE, et al. Measurement comparisons of the medical outcomes study and veterans SF-36 health survey. Health Care Financ Rev. 2004; 25(4): 43-58.PubMedPubMedCentral Kazis LE, et al. Measurement comparisons of the medical outcomes study and veterans SF-36 health survey. Health Care Financ Rev. 2004; 25(4): 43-58.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Yu W, et al. Prevalence and costs of chronic conditions in the VA health care system. Med Care Res Rev. 2003; 60(3 Suppl): 146S-167S.CrossRef Yu W, et al. Prevalence and costs of chronic conditions in the VA health care system. Med Care Res Rev. 2003; 60(3 Suppl): 146S-167S.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lee TA, et al. Mortality rate in veterans with multiple chronic conditions. J Gen Intern Med. 2007; 22 Suppl 3: 403-7.CrossRef Lee TA, et al. Mortality rate in veterans with multiple chronic conditions. J Gen Intern Med. 2007; 22 Suppl 3: 403-7.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cohen BE, et al. Association of cardiovascular risk factors with mental health diagnoses in Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans using VA health care. JAMA; 2009. 302(5): 489-92.CrossRef Cohen BE, et al. Association of cardiovascular risk factors with mental health diagnoses in Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans using VA health care. JAMA; 2009. 302(5): 489-92.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nazi KM, et al. VA OpenNotes: exploring the experiences of early patient adopters with access to clinical notes. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015; 22(2): 380-9.CrossRef Nazi KM, et al. VA OpenNotes: exploring the experiences of early patient adopters with access to clinical notes. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015; 22(2): 380-9.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ancker, J.S., B. Hafeez, and R. Kaushal, Socioeconomic disparities in adoption of personal health records over time. The American journal of managed care, 2016. 22(8): p. 539.PubMedPubMedCentral Ancker, J.S., B. Hafeez, and R. Kaushal, Socioeconomic disparities in adoption of personal health records over time. The American journal of managed care, 2016. 22(8): p. 539.PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Mafi JN, et al. Patients learning to read their doctors’ notes: the importance of reminders. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2016: ocv167. Mafi JN, et al. Patients learning to read their doctors’ notes: the importance of reminders. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2016: ocv167.
26.
go back to reference Gerard M, et al. The Importance of Visit Notes on Patient Portals for Engaging Less Educated or Nonwhite Patients: Survey Study. J Med Internet Res. 2018. 20(5): e191.CrossRef Gerard M, et al. The Importance of Visit Notes on Patient Portals for Engaging Less Educated or Nonwhite Patients: Survey Study. J Med Internet Res. 2018. 20(5): e191.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Walker J, et al. OpenNotes After 7 Years: Patient Experiences With Ongoing Access to Their Clinicians’ Outpatient Visit Notes. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(5): e13876.CrossRef Walker J, et al. OpenNotes After 7 Years: Patient Experiences With Ongoing Access to Their Clinicians’ Outpatient Visit Notes. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(5): e13876.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ammenwerth E, Schnell-Inderst P, Hoerbst A. The impact of electronic patient portals on patient care: a systematic review of controlled trials. J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14(6): p. e162.CrossRef Ammenwerth E, Schnell-Inderst P, Hoerbst A. The impact of electronic patient portals on patient care: a systematic review of controlled trials. J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14(6): p. e162.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ross SE, et al. Providing a web-based online medical record with electronic communication capabilities to patients with congestive heart failure: randomized trial. J Med Internet Res. 2004; 6(2): e12.CrossRef Ross SE, et al. Providing a web-based online medical record with electronic communication capabilities to patients with congestive heart failure: randomized trial. J Med Internet Res. 2004; 6(2): e12.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Palen, T.E., et al., Association of online patient access to clinicians and medical records with use of clinical services. JAMA. 2012; 308(19): 2012-9.CrossRef Palen, T.E., et al., Association of online patient access to clinicians and medical records with use of clinical services. JAMA. 2012; 308(19): 2012-9.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Choudhry AJ, et al. Readability of discharge summaries: with what level of information are we dismissing our patients? Am J Surg. 2016; 211(3): 631-6.CrossRef Choudhry AJ, et al. Readability of discharge summaries: with what level of information are we dismissing our patients? Am J Surg. 2016; 211(3): 631-6.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol. 1948; 32(3): 221-33.CrossRef Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol. 1948; 32(3): 221-33.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Edmunds MR, Barry RJ, Denniston AK. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013; 131(12): 1610-6.CrossRef Edmunds MR, Barry RJ, Denniston AK. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013; 131(12): 1610-6.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Ancker JS, et al. Use of an electronic patient portal among disadvantaged populations. J Gen Intern Med. 2011; 26(10): 1117-23.CrossRef Ancker JS, et al. Use of an electronic patient portal among disadvantaged populations. J Gen Intern Med. 2011; 26(10): 1117-23.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Shimada SL, et al. Personal health record reach in the Veterans Health Administration: a cross-sectional analysis. Journal of medical Internet research. 2014; 16(12): e272.CrossRef Shimada SL, et al. Personal health record reach in the Veterans Health Administration: a cross-sectional analysis. Journal of medical Internet research. 2014; 16(12): e272.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Kontos E, et al. Predictors of eHealth usage: insights on the digital divide from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012. J Med Internet Res, 2014. 16(7): e172.CrossRef Kontos E, et al. Predictors of eHealth usage: insights on the digital divide from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012. J Med Internet Res, 2014. 16(7): e172.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Esch T, et al. Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(1): e010034.CrossRef Esch T, et al. Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(1): e010034.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Jackson SL, et al. Patients who share transparent visit notes with others: characteristics, risks, and benefits. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16(11): e247.CrossRef Jackson SL, et al. Patients who share transparent visit notes with others: characteristics, risks, and benefits. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16(11): e247.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Safeer RS, Keenan J. Health literacy: the gap between physicians and patients. Am Fam Physician. 2005; 72(3): 463-8.PubMed Safeer RS, Keenan J. Health literacy: the gap between physicians and patients. Am Fam Physician. 2005; 72(3): 463-8.PubMed
41.
go back to reference Dobscha SK, et al. Impacts of a Web-Based Course on Mental Health Clinicians’ Attitudes and Communication Behaviors Related to Use of OpenNotes. Psychiatr Serv. 2019; 70(6): 474-479.CrossRef Dobscha SK, et al. Impacts of a Web-Based Course on Mental Health Clinicians’ Attitudes and Communication Behaviors Related to Use of OpenNotes. Psychiatr Serv. 2019; 70(6): 474-479.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Chen J, et al. A natural language processing system that links medical terms in electronic health record notes to lay definitions: system development using physician reviews. Journal of medical Internet research. 2018; 20(1): e26.CrossRef Chen J, et al. A natural language processing system that links medical terms in electronic health record notes to lay definitions: system development using physician reviews. Journal of medical Internet research. 2018; 20(1): e26.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Polepalli Ramesh B, et al. Improving patients’ electronic health record comprehension with NoteAid. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013; 192: 714-8.PubMed Polepalli Ramesh B, et al. Improving patients’ electronic health record comprehension with NoteAid. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013; 192: 714-8.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Impact of Patient Access to Online VA Notes on Healthcare Utilization and Clinician Documentation: a Retrospective Cohort Study
Authors
Amanda C. Blok
Daniel J. Amante
Timothy P. Hogan
Rajani S. Sadasivam
Stephanie L. Shimada
Susan Woods
Kim M. Nazi
Thomas K. Houston
Publication date
01-03-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06304-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

Journal of General Internal Medicine 3/2021 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.