Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 11/2013

01-11-2013

Impact of Mammography Screening Interval on Breast Cancer Diagnosis by Menopausal Status and BMI

Authors: Kim Dittus, MD, PhD, Berta Geller, EdD, Donald L. Weaver, MD, Karla Kerlikowske, MD, Weiwei Zhu, MS, Rebecca Hubbard, PhD, Dejana Braithwaite, PhD, Ellen S. O’Meara, PhD, Diana L. Miglioretti, PhD, For the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 11/2013

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Controversy remains regarding the frequency of screening mammography. Women with different risks for developing breast cancer because of body mass index (BMI) may benefit from tailored recommendations.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of mammography screening interval for women who are normal weight (BMI < 25), overweight (BMI 25–29.9), or obese (BMI ≥ 30), stratified by menopausal status.

DESIGN

Two cohorts selected from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Patient and mammography data were linked to pathology databases and tumor registries.

PARTICIPANTS

The cohort included 4,432 women aged 40–74 with breast cancer; the false-positive analysis included a cohort of 553,343 women aged 40–74 without breast cancer.

MAIN MEASURES

Stage, tumor size and lymph node status by BMI and screening interval (biennial vs. annual). Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy by BMI and screening interval. Analyses were stratified by menopausal status.

KEY RESULTS

Premenopausal obese women undergoing biennial screening had a non-significantly increased odds of a tumor size > 20 mm relative to annual screeners (odds ratio [OR] = 2.07; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.997 to 4.30). Across all BMI categories from normal to obese, postmenopausal women with breast cancer did not present with higher stage, larger tumor size or node positive tumors if they received biennial rather than annual screening. False-positive recall and biopsy recommendations were more common among annually screened women.

CONCLUSION

The only negative outcome identified for biennial vs. annual screening was a larger tumor size (> 20 mm) among obese premenopausal women. Since annual mammography does not improve stage at diagnosis compared to biennial screening and false-positive recall/biopsy rates are higher with annual screening, women and their primary care providers should weigh the harms and benefits when deciding on annual versus biennial screening.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, et al. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:727–37, W237–42. Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, et al. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:727–37, W237–42.
2.
go back to reference Gotzsche PC, Nielsen M. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;1, CD001877.PubMed Gotzsche PC, Nielsen M. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;1, CD001877.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Fletcher SW, Elmore JG. Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1672–80.PubMedCrossRef Fletcher SW, Elmore JG. Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1672–80.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Blamey RW. The frequency of breast cancer screening: results from the UKCCCR randomized trial. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38:1458–64.CrossRef Blamey RW. The frequency of breast cancer screening: results from the UKCCCR randomized trial. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38:1458–64.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Calonge N, Petitti D, DeWitt T, et al. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:716–26, W-236. Calonge N, Petitti D, DeWitt T, et al. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:716–26, W-236.
6.
go back to reference Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brooks D, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:99–119.PubMedCrossRef Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brooks D, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:99–119.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, et al. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1089–96.PubMedCrossRef Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, et al. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1089–96.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hubbard RA, Kerlikowske K, Flowers CI, et al. Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:481–92.PubMedCrossRef Hubbard RA, Kerlikowske K, Flowers CI, et al. Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:481–92.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hunt KA, Sickles EA. Effect of obesity on screening mammography: outcomes analysis of 88,346 consecutive examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1251–5.PubMedCrossRef Hunt KA, Sickles EA. Effect of obesity on screening mammography: outcomes analysis of 88,346 consecutive examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1251–5.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cui Y, Whiteman MK, Flaws JA, et al. Body mass and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis. Int J Cancer. 2002;98:279–83.PubMedCrossRef Cui Y, Whiteman MK, Flaws JA, et al. Body mass and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis. Int J Cancer. 2002;98:279–83.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Porter GA, Inglis KM, Wood LA, et al. Effect of obesity on presentation of breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:327–32.PubMedCrossRef Porter GA, Inglis KM, Wood LA, et al. Effect of obesity on presentation of breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:327–32.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ahn J, Schatzkin A, Lacey JV Jr, et al. Adiposity, adult weight change, and postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:2091–102.PubMedCrossRef Ahn J, Schatzkin A, Lacey JV Jr, et al. Adiposity, adult weight change, and postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:2091–102.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Daling JR, Malone KE, Doody DR, et al. Relation of body mass index to tumor markers and survival among young women with invasive ductal breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2001;92:720–9.PubMedCrossRef Daling JR, Malone KE, Doody DR, et al. Relation of body mass index to tumor markers and survival among young women with invasive ductal breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2001;92:720–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Macinnis RJ, English DR, Gertig DM, et al. Body size and composition and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:2117–25.PubMed Macinnis RJ, English DR, Gertig DM, et al. Body size and composition and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:2117–25.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Feigelson HS, Patel AV, Teras LR, et al. Adult weight gain and histopathologic characteristics of breast cancer among postmenopausal women. Cancer. 2006;107:12–21.PubMedCrossRef Feigelson HS, Patel AV, Teras LR, et al. Adult weight gain and histopathologic characteristics of breast cancer among postmenopausal women. Cancer. 2006;107:12–21.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Stark A, Stahl MS, Kirchner HL, et al. Body mass index at the time of diagnosis and the risk of advanced stages and poorly differentiated cancers of the breast: findings from a case-series study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2010;34:1381–6.CrossRef Stark A, Stahl MS, Kirchner HL, et al. Body mass index at the time of diagnosis and the risk of advanced stages and poorly differentiated cancers of the breast: findings from a case-series study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2010;34:1381–6.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kerlikowske K, Walker R, Miglioretti DL, et al. Obesity, mammography use and accuracy, and advanced breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1724–33.PubMedCrossRef Kerlikowske K, Walker R, Miglioretti DL, et al. Obesity, mammography use and accuracy, and advanced breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1724–33.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Renehan AG, Frystyk J, Flyvbjerg A. Obesity and cancer risk: the role of the insulin-IGF axis. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2006;17:328–36.PubMedCrossRef Renehan AG, Frystyk J, Flyvbjerg A. Obesity and cancer risk: the role of the insulin-IGF axis. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2006;17:328–36.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gonullu G, Ersoy C, Ersoy A, et al. Relation between insulin resistance and serum concentrations of IL-6 and TNF-alpha in overweight or obese women with early stage breast cancer. Cytokine. 2005;31:264–9.PubMedCrossRef Gonullu G, Ersoy C, Ersoy A, et al. Relation between insulin resistance and serum concentrations of IL-6 and TNF-alpha in overweight or obese women with early stage breast cancer. Cytokine. 2005;31:264–9.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Garofalo C, Koda M, Cascio S, et al. Increased expression of leptin and the leptin receptor as a marker of breast cancer progression: possible role of obesity-related stimuli. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:1447–53.PubMedCrossRef Garofalo C, Koda M, Cascio S, et al. Increased expression of leptin and the leptin receptor as a marker of breast cancer progression: possible role of obesity-related stimuli. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:1447–53.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ostbye T, Taylor DH Jr, Yancy WS Jr, et al. Associations between obesity and receipt of screening mammography, Papanicolaou tests, and influenza vaccination: results from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and the Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD) Study. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:1623–30.PubMedCrossRef Ostbye T, Taylor DH Jr, Yancy WS Jr, et al. Associations between obesity and receipt of screening mammography, Papanicolaou tests, and influenza vaccination: results from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and the Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD) Study. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:1623–30.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Maruthur NM, Bolen S, Brancati FL, et al. Obesity and mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:665–77.PubMedCrossRef Maruthur NM, Bolen S, Brancati FL, et al. Obesity and mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:665–77.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Nelson HD, Zakher B, Cantor A, Fu R, Grivvin J, O’Meara ES, Buist DSM, Kerlikowske K, van Ravesteyn NT, Trentham-Dietz A, Mandelblatt JS, Miglioretti DS. Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40–49 years: a systemic review and metaanalysis. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:635–48.PubMedCrossRef Nelson HD, Zakher B, Cantor A, Fu R, Grivvin J, O’Meara ES, Buist DSM, Kerlikowske K, van Ravesteyn NT, Trentham-Dietz A, Mandelblatt JS, Miglioretti DS. Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40–49 years: a systemic review and metaanalysis. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:635–48.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Elmore JG, Carney PA, Abraham LA, et al. The association between obesity and screening mammography accuracy. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1140–7.PubMedCrossRef Elmore JG, Carney PA, Abraham LA, et al. The association between obesity and screening mammography accuracy. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1140–7.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Destounis S, Newell M, Pinsky R. Breast imaging and intervention in the overweight and obese patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:296–302.PubMedCrossRef Destounis S, Newell M, Pinsky R. Breast imaging and intervention in the overweight and obese patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:296–302.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ballard-Barbash R, Taplin SH, Yankaskas BC, et al. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database. Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:1001–8.CrossRef Ballard-Barbash R, Taplin SH, Yankaskas BC, et al. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database. Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:1001–8.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Breast Imaging Atlas. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Breast Imaging Atlas. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003.
29.
go back to reference Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Zheng Y, Weaver DL, Cutter G, Yankaskas BC, Rosenberg R, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Taplin SH, Urban N, Geller BM. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(20):1546–54.PubMedCrossRef Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Zheng Y, Weaver DL, Cutter G, Yankaskas BC, Rosenberg R, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Taplin SH, Urban N, Geller BM. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(20):1546–54.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference White E, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, et al. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1832–9.PubMedCrossRef White E, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, et al. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1832–9.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Sprague BL, Trentham-Dietz A, Cronin KA. A sustained decline in postmenopausal hormone use: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2010. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(3):595–603.PubMedCrossRef Sprague BL, Trentham-Dietz A, Cronin KA. A sustained decline in postmenopausal hormone use: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2010. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(3):595–603.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference NHLBI. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults—the evidence report. National Institutes of Health. Obes Res. 1998;6:51S–209.CrossRef NHLBI. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults—the evidence report. National Institutes of Health. Obes Res. 1998;6:51S–209.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference American Joint Committee on Cancer. Manual for Staging of Cancer. 6th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 2002. American Joint Committee on Cancer. Manual for Staging of Cancer. 6th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 2002.
34.
35.
go back to reference Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, Smith RA. Modelling the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening test. Stat Methods Med Res. 2010;19:429–49.PubMedCrossRef Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, Smith RA. Modelling the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening test. Stat Methods Med Res. 2010;19:429–49.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Allred DC. Ductal carcinoma in situ: terminology, classification, and natural history. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010:134–8.PubMedCrossRef Allred DC. Ductal carcinoma in situ: terminology, classification, and natural history. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010:134–8.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, et al. Continued local recurrence of carcinoma 15–25 years after a diagnosis of low grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated only by biopsy. Cancer. 1995;76:1197–2000.PubMedCrossRef Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, et al. Continued local recurrence of carcinoma 15–25 years after a diagnosis of low grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated only by biopsy. Cancer. 1995;76:1197–2000.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Kerlikowske K, Molinaro A, Cha I, et al. Characteristics associated with recurrence among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1692–702.PubMedCrossRef Kerlikowske K, Molinaro A, Cha I, et al. Characteristics associated with recurrence among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1692–702.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Kerlikowske K, Molinaro AM, Gauthier ML, et al. Biomarker expression and risk of subsequent tumors after initial ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:627–37.PubMedCrossRef Kerlikowske K, Molinaro AM, Gauthier ML, et al. Biomarker expression and risk of subsequent tumors after initial ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:627–37.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Yaffe MJ, Mainprize JG. Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening. Radiology. 2011;258:98–105.PubMedCrossRef Yaffe MJ, Mainprize JG. Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening. Radiology. 2011;258:98–105.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, et al. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA. 2010;303:235–41.PubMedCrossRef Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, et al. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA. 2010;303:235–41.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Merrill RM, Richardson JS. Validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001–2006. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009;6:A121.PubMed Merrill RM, Richardson JS. Validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001–2006. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009;6:A121.PubMed
43.
go back to reference Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R, Geller BM, Leung JWT, Rosenberg RD, Smith-Blindman R, Yankaskas BC. Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. Radiology. 2005;253(3):775–90.CrossRef Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R, Geller BM, Leung JWT, Rosenberg RD, Smith-Blindman R, Yankaskas BC. Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. Radiology. 2005;253(3):775–90.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Henry LR, Stojadinovic A, Swain SM, et al. The influence of a gene expression profile on breast cancer decisions. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99:319–23.PubMedCrossRef Henry LR, Stojadinovic A, Swain SM, et al. The influence of a gene expression profile on breast cancer decisions. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99:319–23.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Lo SS, Mumby PB, Norton J, et al. Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1671–6.PubMedCrossRef Lo SS, Mumby PB, Norton J, et al. Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1671–6.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Metadata
Title
Impact of Mammography Screening Interval on Breast Cancer Diagnosis by Menopausal Status and BMI
Authors
Kim Dittus, MD, PhD
Berta Geller, EdD
Donald L. Weaver, MD
Karla Kerlikowske, MD
Weiwei Zhu, MS
Rebecca Hubbard, PhD
Dejana Braithwaite, PhD
Ellen S. O’Meara, PhD
Diana L. Miglioretti, PhD
For the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 11/2013
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2507-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2013

Journal of General Internal Medicine 11/2013 Go to the issue

Healing Arts: Materia Medica

Five Visits