Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2018

01-08-2018 | Original Research

Impact of Cost Display on Ordering Patterns for Hospital Laboratory and Imaging Services

Authors: Mark T. Silvestri, MD, MHS, Xiao Xu, PhD, Theodore Long, MD, MHS, Tasce Bongiovanni, MD, MHS, Steven L. Bernstein, MD, Sarwat I. Chaudhry, MD, Julia I. Silvestri, BA, Marilyn Stolar, PhD, Erich J. Greene, PhD, James D. Dziura, PhD, Cary P. Gross, MD, Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, SM

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 8/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Physicians “purchase” many health care services on behalf of patients yet remain largely unaware of the costs of these services. Electronic health record (EHR) cost displays may facilitate cost-conscious ordering of health services.

Objective

To determine whether displaying hospital lab and imaging order costs is associated with changes in the number and costs of orders placed.

Design

Quasi-experimental study.

Participants

All patients with inpatient or observation encounters across a multi-site health system from April 2013 to October 2015.

Intervention

Display of order costs, based on Medicare fee schedules, in the EHR for 1032 lab tests and 1329 imaging tests.

Main Measures

Outcomes for both lab and imaging orders were (1) whether an order was placed during a hospital encounter, (2) whether an order was placed on a given patient-day, (3) number of orders placed per patient-day, and (4) cost of orders placed per patient-day.

Key Results

During the lab and imaging study periods, there were 248,214 and 258,267 encounters, respectively. Cost display implementation was associated with a decreased odds of any lab or imaging being ordered during the encounter (lab adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.97, p = .01; imaging AOR = 0.97, p < .001), a decreased odds of any lab or imaging being ordered on a given patient-day (lab AOR = 0.95, p < .001; imaging AOR = 0.97, p < .001), a decreased number of lab or imaging orders on patient-days with orders (lab adjusted count ratio = 0.93, p < .001; imaging adjusted count ratio = 0.98, p < .001), and a decreased cost of lab orders and increased cost of imaging orders on patient-days with orders (lab adjusted cost ratio = 0.93, p < .001; imaging adjusted cost ratio = 1.02, p = .003). Overall, the intervention was associated with an 8.5 and 1.7% reduction in lab and imaging costs per patient-day, respectively.

Conclusions

Displaying costs within EHR ordering screens was associated with decreases in the number and costs of lab and imaging orders.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Allan GM, Lexchin J. Physician awareness of diagnostic and nondrug therapeutic costs: A systematic review. International journal of technology assessment in health care. 2008;24(2):158–165.CrossRefPubMed Allan GM, Lexchin J. Physician awareness of diagnostic and nondrug therapeutic costs: A systematic review. International journal of technology assessment in health care. 2008;24(2):158–165.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Long T, Silvestri MT, Dashevsky M, Halim A, Fogerty RL. Exit Survey of Senior Residents: Cost Conscious but Uninformed. J Grad Med Educ. 2016;8(2):248–251.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Long T, Silvestri MT, Dashevsky M, Halim A, Fogerty RL. Exit Survey of Senior Residents: Cost Conscious but Uninformed. J Grad Med Educ. 2016;8(2):248–251.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Allan GM, Lexchin J, Wiebe N. Physician awareness of drug cost: A systematic review. PLoS medicine. 2007;4(9):1486–1496.CrossRef Allan GM, Lexchin J, Wiebe N. Physician awareness of drug cost: A systematic review. PLoS medicine. 2007;4(9):1486–1496.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Long T, Bongiovanni T, Dashevsky M, et al. Impact of laboratory cost display on resident attitudes and knowledge about costs. Postgraduate medical journal. 2016. Long T, Bongiovanni T, Dashevsky M, et al. Impact of laboratory cost display on resident attitudes and knowledge about costs. Postgraduate medical journal. 2016.
5.
go back to reference Hampers LC, Cha S, Gutglass DJ, Krug SE, Binns HJ. The effect of price information on test-ordering behavior and patient outcomes in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics. 1999;103(4 Pt 2):877–882.PubMed Hampers LC, Cha S, Gutglass DJ, Krug SE, Binns HJ. The effect of price information on test-ordering behavior and patient outcomes in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics. 1999;103(4 Pt 2):877–882.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Tierney WM, Miller ME, McDonald CJ. The effect on test ordering of informing physicians of the charges for outpatient diagnostic tests. The New England journal of medicine. 1990;322(21):1499–1504.CrossRefPubMed Tierney WM, Miller ME, McDonald CJ. The effect on test ordering of informing physicians of the charges for outpatient diagnostic tests. The New England journal of medicine. 1990;322(21):1499–1504.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Tierney WM, Miller ME, Overhage JM, McDonald CJ. Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Effects on resource utilization. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 1993;269(3):379–383.CrossRefPubMed Tierney WM, Miller ME, Overhage JM, McDonald CJ. Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Effects on resource utilization. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 1993;269(3):379–383.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Chien AT, Lehmann LS, Hatfield LA, et al. A Randomized Trial of Displaying Paid Price Information on Imaging Study and Procedure Ordering Rates. Journal of general internal medicine. 2017;32(4):434–448.CrossRefPubMed Chien AT, Lehmann LS, Hatfield LA, et al. A Randomized Trial of Displaying Paid Price Information on Imaging Study and Procedure Ordering Rates. Journal of general internal medicine. 2017;32(4):434–448.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Durand DJ, Feldman LS, Lewin JS, Brotman DJ. Provider cost transparency alone has no impact on inpatient imaging utilization. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR. 2013;10(2):108–113.CrossRefPubMed Durand DJ, Feldman LS, Lewin JS, Brotman DJ. Provider cost transparency alone has no impact on inpatient imaging utilization. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR. 2013;10(2):108–113.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Feldman LS, Shihab HM, Thiemann D, et al. Impact of providing fee data on laboratory test ordering: a controlled clinical trial. JAMA internal medicine. 2013;173(10):903–908.CrossRefPubMed Feldman LS, Shihab HM, Thiemann D, et al. Impact of providing fee data on laboratory test ordering: a controlled clinical trial. JAMA internal medicine. 2013;173(10):903–908.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Horn DM, Koplan KE, Senese MD, Orav EJ, Sequist TD. The impact of cost displays on primary care physician laboratory test ordering. Journal of general internal medicine. 2014;29(5):708–714.CrossRefPubMed Horn DM, Koplan KE, Senese MD, Orav EJ, Sequist TD. The impact of cost displays on primary care physician laboratory test ordering. Journal of general internal medicine. 2014;29(5):708–714.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sedrak MS, Myers JS, Small DS, et al. Effect of a Price Transparency Intervention in the Electronic Health Record on Clinician Ordering of Inpatient Laboratory Tests: The PRICE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA internal medicine. 2017. Sedrak MS, Myers JS, Small DS, et al. Effect of a Price Transparency Intervention in the Electronic Health Record on Clinician Ordering of Inpatient Laboratory Tests: The PRICE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA internal medicine. 2017.
13.
go back to reference Silvestri MT, Bongiovanni TR, Glover JG, Gross CP. Impact of price display on provider ordering: A systematic review. Journal of hospital medicine : an official publication of the Society of Hospital Medicine. 2016;11(1):65–76.CrossRef Silvestri MT, Bongiovanni TR, Glover JG, Gross CP. Impact of price display on provider ordering: A systematic review. Journal of hospital medicine : an official publication of the Society of Hospital Medicine. 2016;11(1):65–76.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Goetz C, Rotman SR, Hartoularos G, Bishop TF. The Effect of Charge Display on Cost of Care and Physician Practice Behaviors: A Systematic Review. Journal of general internal medicine. 2015. Goetz C, Rotman SR, Hartoularos G, Bishop TF. The Effect of Charge Display on Cost of Care and Physician Practice Behaviors: A Systematic Review. Journal of general internal medicine. 2015.
15.
go back to reference Fang DZ, Sran G, Gessner D, et al. Cost and turn-around time display decreases inpatient ordering of reference laboratory tests: a time series. BMJ quality & safety. 2014. Fang DZ, Sran G, Gessner D, et al. Cost and turn-around time display decreases inpatient ordering of reference laboratory tests: a time series. BMJ quality & safety. 2014.
16.
go back to reference Nougon G, Muschart X, Gerard V, et al. Does offering pricing information to resident physicians in the emergency department potentially reduce laboratory and radiology costs? European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. 2014. Nougon G, Muschart X, Gerard V, et al. Does offering pricing information to resident physicians in the emergency department potentially reduce laboratory and radiology costs? European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. 2014.
17.
go back to reference Rosenbaum PR. Interference between units in randomized experiments. J Am Stat Assoc. 2007;102(477):191–200.CrossRef Rosenbaum PR. Interference between units in randomized experiments. J Am Stat Assoc. 2007;102(477):191–200.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Jha A, et al. Does the computerized display of charges affect inpatient ancillary test utilization? Archives of internal medicine. 1997;157(21):2501–2508.CrossRefPubMed Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Jha A, et al. Does the computerized display of charges affect inpatient ancillary test utilization? Archives of internal medicine. 1997;157(21):2501–2508.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lin YC, Miller SR. The impact of price labeling of muscle relaxants on cost consciousness among anesthesiologists. J Clin Anesth. 1998;10(5):401–403.CrossRefPubMed Lin YC, Miller SR. The impact of price labeling of muscle relaxants on cost consciousness among anesthesiologists. J Clin Anesth. 1998;10(5):401–403.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference McNitt J, Bode E, Nelson R. Long-term pharmaceutical cost reduction using a data management system. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 1998;87(4):837–842.PubMed McNitt J, Bode E, Nelson R. Long-term pharmaceutical cost reduction using a data management system. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 1998;87(4):837–842.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Impact of Cost Display on Ordering Patterns for Hospital Laboratory and Imaging Services
Authors
Mark T. Silvestri, MD, MHS
Xiao Xu, PhD
Theodore Long, MD, MHS
Tasce Bongiovanni, MD, MHS
Steven L. Bernstein, MD
Sarwat I. Chaudhry, MD
Julia I. Silvestri, BA
Marilyn Stolar, PhD
Erich J. Greene, PhD
James D. Dziura, PhD
Cary P. Gross, MD
Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, SM
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4495-6

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2018 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.