Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 4/2018

01-04-2018 | Original Article – Cancer Research

Impact of comorbidities at diagnosis on prostate cancer treatment and survival

Authors: Katarina Luise Matthes, Manuela Limam, Giulia Pestoni, Leonhard Held, Dimitri Korol, Sabine Rohrmann

Published in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the associations of comorbidities with primary treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) patients and of comorbidities with PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) compared to other-cause mortality (OCM) in Switzerland.

Patients and methods

We included 1527 men diagnosed with PCa in 2000 and 2001 in the canton of Zurich. Multiple imputation methods were applied to missing data for stage, grade and comorbidities. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were used to explore the associations of comorbidities with treatment. Cox regression models were used to estimate all-cause mortality, and Fine and Gray competing risk regression models to estimate sub-distribution hazard ratios for the outcomes PCSM and OCM.

Results

Increasing age was associated with a decreasing probability of receiving curative treatment, whereas an increasing Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) did not influence the treatment decision as strongly as age. The probability of OCM was higher for patients with comorbidities compared to those without comorbidities [CCI 1: hazard ratio 2.07 (95% confidence interval 1.51–2.85), CCI 2+: 2.34 (1.59–3.44)]; this was not observed for PCSM [CCI 1: 0.79 (0.50–1.23), CCI 2+: 0.97 (0.59–1.59)]. In addition, comorbidities had a greater impact on the patients’ mortality than age.

Conclusions

The results of the current study suggest that chronological age is a stronger predictor of treatment choices than comorbidities, although comorbidities have a larger influence on patients’ mortality. Hence, inclusion of comorbidities in treatment choices may provide more appropriate treatment for PCa patients to counteract over- or undertreatment.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMed Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Choudhury JB (2002) Non-parametric confidence interval estimation for competing risks analysis: application to contraceptive data. Stat Med 21:1129–1144CrossRefPubMed Choudhury JB (2002) Non-parametric confidence interval estimation for competing risks analysis: application to contraceptive data. Stat Med 21:1129–1144CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gray B (2014) cmprsk: subdistribution analysis of competing risks Gray B (2014) cmprsk: subdistribution analysis of competing risks
go back to reference Harlan LC et al (2001) Factors associated with initial therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1864–1871CrossRefPubMed Harlan LC et al (2001) Factors associated with initial therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1864–1871CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jacobs BL, Lopa SH, Yabes JG, Nelson JB, Barnato AE, Degenholtz HB (2016) Association of functional status and treatment choice among older men with prostate cancer in the Medicare. Adv Popul Cancer 122:3199–3206. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30184 Jacobs BL, Lopa SH, Yabes JG, Nelson JB, Barnato AE, Degenholtz HB (2016) Association of functional status and treatment choice among older men with prostate cancer in the Medicare. Adv Popul Cancer 122:3199–3206. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cncr.​30184
go back to reference Matthes KL, Limam M, Dehler S, Korol D, Rohrmann S (2017) Primary treatment choice over time and relative survival of prostate cancer patients: influence of age, grade, and stage oncology research and treatment. https://doi.org/10.1159/000477096 Matthes KL, Limam M, Dehler S, Korol D, Rohrmann S (2017) Primary treatment choice over time and relative survival of prostate cancer patients: influence of age, grade, and stage oncology research and treatment. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1159/​000477096
go back to reference Rubin DB (1987) Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef Rubin DB (1987) Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef
go back to reference Therneau TM (2015) A package for survival analysis in S Therneau TM (2015) A package for survival analysis in S
go back to reference Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRef Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact of comorbidities at diagnosis on prostate cancer treatment and survival
Authors
Katarina Luise Matthes
Manuela Limam
Giulia Pestoni
Leonhard Held
Dimitri Korol
Sabine Rohrmann
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0171-5216
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1335
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-018-2596-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 4/2018 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.