Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 7/2016

01-07-2016 | Original Article

Impact of Colonoscopy Insertion Techniques on Adenoma Detection

Authors: Sergio Cadoni, Přemysl Falt, Stefano Sanna, Mariangela Argiolas, Viviana Fanari, Paolo Gallittu, Mauro Liggi, Donatella Mura, Maria L. Porcedda, Vit Smajstrla, Matteo Erriu, Felix W. Leung

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Low adenoma detection rate (ADR) predicts development of interval cancers, found mainly in the right (cecum-ascending) colon, where poor bowel preparation is an associated factor. Single-site studies reported increased detection of adenomas in the proximal colon segments by water exchange (WE). Data about colon cleansing revealed that WE had the greatest impact in the right colon.

Aims

To test the hypothesis that WE had the greatest impact on ADR in colon segments with the most favorable bowel cleanliness scores, namely the right colon.

Methods

We pooled right colon and overall ADR data of three similarly designed colonoscopy trials that compared WE, water immersion (WI) and insufflation of air or carbon dioxide (AICD) in a mixed gender European population.

Results

In this study, 1200 (704 males) subjects and were included. 288 were screening cases. Demographic and procedural data were comparable. Water exchange achieved significantly higher right colon <10 mm ADR (11.9 %, vs WI 6.9 %, p = 0.016; vs AICD 7.2 %, p = 0.025). Water exchange achieved the lowest proportions of poor bowel preparation and the highest right colon and overall Boston bowel preparation scale scores (p range 0.003, <0.0005). In patients with right colon excellent bowel cleanliness, water exchange was the only method significantly associated with right colon adenoma detection. One of the limitations is unblinded colonoscopists.

Conclusions

In a mixed gender European population, water exchange is confirmed to be a superior insertion technique showing a significant increase in <10 mm right colon adenoma detection, achieving the cleanest colon and lowest proportions of poor bowel preparation requiring repeat procedures.

ClinicalTrials.Gov No

NCT01781650, 01954862, 01780818.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Leung FW. Water exchange may be superior to water immersion for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:1012–1014.CrossRefPubMed Leung FW. Water exchange may be superior to water immersion for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:1012–1014.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hsieh Y-H, Koo M, Leung FW. A patient-blinded randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflation, water immersion, and water exchange during minimally sedated colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1390–1400.CrossRefPubMed Hsieh Y-H, Koo M, Leung FW. A patient-blinded randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflation, water immersion, and water exchange during minimally sedated colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1390–1400.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cadoni S, Sanna S, Gallittu P, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing real-time insertion pain during colonoscopy confirmed water exchange to be superior to water immersion in enhancing patient comfort. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:557–566.CrossRefPubMed Cadoni S, Sanna S, Gallittu P, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing real-time insertion pain during colonoscopy confirmed water exchange to be superior to water immersion in enhancing patient comfort. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:557–566.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cadoni S, Falt P, Gallittu P, et al. Water exchange is the least-painful colonoscope insertion technique, increasing completion of unsedated colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:1972–1980.CrossRefPubMed Cadoni S, Falt P, Gallittu P, et al. Water exchange is the least-painful colonoscope insertion technique, increasing completion of unsedated colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:1972–1980.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Leung FW, Amato A, Ell C, et al. Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:657–666.CrossRefPubMed Leung FW, Amato A, Ell C, et al. Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:657–666.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Leung FW, Hu B, Wu J. Comparative effectiveness of water immersion and water exchange versus air insufflation for colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2013;3:100–103.CrossRef Leung FW, Hu B, Wu J. Comparative effectiveness of water immersion and water exchange versus air insufflation for colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2013;3:100–103.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Leung FW, Harker JO, Leung JW, et al. The water method significantly enhances proximal diminutive adenoma detection rate in unsedated patients. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011;1:8–13.PubMedPubMedCentral Leung FW, Harker JO, Leung JW, et al. The water method significantly enhances proximal diminutive adenoma detection rate in unsedated patients. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011;1:8–13.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Yen AW, Yung VY, Leung JW, et al. Insertion water exchange minimizes endoscopist multitasking during withdrawal inspection—a plausible explanation for enhanced polyp detection in the right colon. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2015;5:3–9.CrossRef Yen AW, Yung VY, Leung JW, et al. Insertion water exchange minimizes endoscopist multitasking during withdrawal inspection—a plausible explanation for enhanced polyp detection in the right colon. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2015;5:3–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, et al. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:903–924.CrossRefPubMed Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, et al. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:903–924.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:620–625.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:620–625.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Calderwood AH, Thompson KD, Schroy PC III, et al. Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:691–699.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Calderwood AH, Thompson KD, Schroy PC III, et al. Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:691–699.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Leung FW, Harker JO, Jackson G, et al. A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:693–700.CrossRefPubMed Leung FW, Harker JO, Jackson G, et al. A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:693–700.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hewett DG, Kahi CJ, Rex DK. Does colonoscopy work? J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8:67–76.PubMed Hewett DG, Kahi CJ, Rex DK. Does colonoscopy work? J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8:67–76.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. ASGE/ACG taskforce on quality in endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:31–53.CrossRefPubMed Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. ASGE/ACG taskforce on quality in endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:31–53.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sanduleanu S, le Clercq CMC, Dekker E, et al. Definition and taxonomy of interval colorectal cancers: a proposal for standardising nomenclature. Gut. 2015;64:1257–1267.CrossRefPubMed Sanduleanu S, le Clercq CMC, Dekker E, et al. Definition and taxonomy of interval colorectal cancers: a proposal for standardising nomenclature. Gut. 2015;64:1257–1267.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Cohen LB. Split dosing of bowel preparations for colonoscopy: an analysis of its efficacy, safety, and tolerability. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:406–412.CrossRefPubMed Cohen LB. Split dosing of bowel preparations for colonoscopy: an analysis of its efficacy, safety, and tolerability. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:406–412.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Clark BT, Rustagi T, Laine L. What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1714–1723.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Clark BT, Rustagi T, Laine L. What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1714–1723.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Robinson CM, et al. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:463–470.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Robinson CM, et al. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:463–470.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Oh CH, Lee CK, Kim JW, et al. Suboptimal bowel preparation significantly impairs colonoscopic detection of non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:2294–2303.CrossRefPubMed Oh CH, Lee CK, Kim JW, et al. Suboptimal bowel preparation significantly impairs colonoscopic detection of non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:2294–2303.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference le Clercq CM, Bouwens MW, Rondagh EJ, et al. Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable: a population-based study. Gut. 2014;63:957–963.CrossRefPubMed le Clercq CM, Bouwens MW, Rondagh EJ, et al. Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable: a population-based study. Gut. 2014;63:957–963.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Lakoff J, Paszat LF, Saskin R, et al. Risk of developing proximal versus distal colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy: a population-based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:1117–1121.CrossRefPubMed Lakoff J, Paszat LF, Saskin R, et al. Risk of developing proximal versus distal colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy: a population-based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:1117–1121.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Pohl H, Robertson DJ. Colorectal cancers detected after colonoscopy frequently result from missed lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:858–864.CrossRefPubMed Pohl H, Robertson DJ. Colorectal cancers detected after colonoscopy frequently result from missed lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:858–864.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, et al. Interval cancers after negative colonoscopy: population-based case-control study. Gut. 2012;61:1576–1582.CrossRefPubMed Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, et al. Interval cancers after negative colonoscopy: population-based case-control study. Gut. 2012;61:1576–1582.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Robertson DJ, Lieberman DA, Winawer SJ, et al. Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis. Gut. 2014;63:949–956.CrossRefPubMed Robertson DJ, Lieberman DA, Winawer SJ, et al. Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis. Gut. 2014;63:949–956.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Rondagh EJA, Bouwens MWE, Riedl RG, et al. Endoscopic appearance of proximal colorectal neoplasms and potential implications for colonoscopy in cancer prevention. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:1218–1225.CrossRefPubMed Rondagh EJA, Bouwens MWE, Riedl RG, et al. Endoscopic appearance of proximal colorectal neoplasms and potential implications for colonoscopy in cancer prevention. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:1218–1225.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Gupta S, Balasubramanian BA, Fu T, et al. Polyps with advanced neoplasia are smaller in the right than in the left colon: implications for colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:1395–1401.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gupta S, Balasubramanian BA, Fu T, et al. Polyps with advanced neoplasia are smaller in the right than in the left colon: implications for colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:1395–1401.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Limketkai BN, Lam-Himlin D, Arnold MA, et al. The cutting edge of serrated polyps: a practical guide to approaching and managing serrated colon polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:360–375.CrossRefPubMed Limketkai BN, Lam-Himlin D, Arnold MA, et al. The cutting edge of serrated polyps: a practical guide to approaching and managing serrated colon polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:360–375.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:343–350.CrossRefPubMed van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:343–350.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy. 2008;40:284–290.CrossRefPubMed Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy. 2008;40:284–290.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Farrar WD, Sawhney MS, Nelson DB, et al. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1259–1264.CrossRefPubMed Farrar WD, Sawhney MS, Nelson DB, et al. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1259–1264.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Cooper GS, Xu F, Barnholtz Sloan JS, et al. Prevalence and predictors of interval colorectal cancers in medicare beneficiaries. Cancer. 2012;118:3044–3052.CrossRefPubMed Cooper GS, Xu F, Barnholtz Sloan JS, et al. Prevalence and predictors of interval colorectal cancers in medicare beneficiaries. Cancer. 2012;118:3044–3052.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Richter JM, Campbell EJ, Chung DC. Interval colorectal cancer after colonoscopy. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015;14:46–51.CrossRefPubMed Richter JM, Campbell EJ, Chung DC. Interval colorectal cancer after colonoscopy. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015;14:46–51.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Samadder NJ, Curtin K, Tuohy TMF, et al. Characteristics of missed or interval colorectal cancer and patient survival: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:950–960.CrossRefPubMed Samadder NJ, Curtin K, Tuohy TMF, et al. Characteristics of missed or interval colorectal cancer and patient survival: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:950–960.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, et al. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:96–102.CrossRefPubMed Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, et al. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:96–102.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:76–79.CrossRefPubMed Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:76–79.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:378–384.CrossRefPubMed Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:378–384.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Gurudu SR, Ramirez FC, Harrison ME, et al. Increased adenoma detection rate with system-wide implementation of a split-dose preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:603–608.CrossRefPubMed Gurudu SR, Ramirez FC, Harrison ME, et al. Increased adenoma detection rate with system-wide implementation of a split-dose preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:603–608.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Radaelli F, Paggi S, Hassan C, et al. Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme. Gut. 2015. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310685.PubMed Radaelli F, Paggi S, Hassan C, et al. Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme. Gut. 2015. doi:10.​1136/​gutjnl-2015-310685.PubMed
41.
go back to reference Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1696–1700.CrossRefPubMed Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1696–1700.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Variation of adenoma prevalence by age, sex, race, and colon location in a large population: implications for screening and quality programs. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:172–180.CrossRefPubMed Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Variation of adenoma prevalence by age, sex, race, and colon location in a large population: implications for screening and quality programs. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:172–180.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Ben Q, An W, Jiang Y, et al. Body mass index increases risk for colorectal adenomas based on meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:762–772.CrossRefPubMed Ben Q, An W, Jiang Y, et al. Body mass index increases risk for colorectal adenomas based on meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:762–772.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference MacPhail ME, Hardacker KA, Tiwari A, et al. Intraprocedural cleansing work during colonoscopy and achievable rates of adequate preparation in an open-access endoscopy unit. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:525–530.CrossRefPubMed MacPhail ME, Hardacker KA, Tiwari A, et al. Intraprocedural cleansing work during colonoscopy and achievable rates of adequate preparation in an open-access endoscopy unit. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:525–530.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Impact of Colonoscopy Insertion Techniques on Adenoma Detection
Authors
Sergio Cadoni
Přemysl Falt
Stefano Sanna
Mariangela Argiolas
Viviana Fanari
Paolo Gallittu
Mauro Liggi
Donatella Mura
Maria L. Porcedda
Vit Smajstrla
Matteo Erriu
Felix W. Leung
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4053-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 7/2016 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.