Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Japanese Journal of Radiology 7/2016

01-07-2016 | Technical Note

Image quality and variability for routine diagnostic FDG-PET scans in a Japanese community hospital: current status and possibility of improvement

Authors: Keiji Shimizu, Seiichi Yamamoto, Keiichi Matsumoto, Megumu Hino, Michio Senda

Published in: Japanese Journal of Radiology | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In Japan, commercially delivered FDG is manufactured in three batches per day at fixed constant activity and distributed in vials. Consequently, the amount of activity administered to the patient varies depending on the timing of injection. We evaluated a method for adjusting the scan time according to the body mass index (BMI) to obtain equivalent image quality for every patient.

Methods

We examined a total of 301 routine clinical oncology PET scans using commercially delivered FDG. The relation between the injected activity and the noise equivalent count per scan length (NECpatient) was evaluated as a marker of image quality; its association with BMI was also examined.

Results

The injected activity and NECpatient exhibited large variations (230.4 ± 55.8 MBq and 19.9 ± 2.9 Mcounts/m). There was a weak correlation between the injected activity and NECpatient (r ~ 0.3) for thin patients (BMI < 21 kg/m2), but no correlation for patients with higher BMIs. However, a significant correlation was found between BMI and NECpatient (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

In a community hospital using commercially delivered FDG, it is possible to reduce the variability of the NECpatient and obtain uniform image quality by changing the scan time as a function of patient BMI, even with uncontrollable injected activity.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Reske SN, Kotzerke J. FDG-PET for clinical use. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2001;28:1707–23.CrossRef Reske SN, Kotzerke J. FDG-PET for clinical use. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2001;28:1707–23.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:328–54.CrossRefPubMed Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:328–54.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference de Groot EH, Post N, Boellaard R, Wagenaar NR, Willemsen AT, van Dalen JA. Optimized dose regimen for whole-body FDG-PET imaging. EJNMMI Res. 2013;3:63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Groot EH, Post N, Boellaard R, Wagenaar NR, Willemsen AT, van Dalen JA. Optimized dose regimen for whole-body FDG-PET imaging. EJNMMI Res. 2013;3:63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Watson CC, Casey ME, Bendriem B, Carney JP, Townsend DW, Eberl S, et al. Optimizing injected dose in clinical PET by accurately modeling the counting-rate response functions specific to individual patient scans. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1825–34.PubMed Watson CC, Casey ME, Bendriem B, Carney JP, Townsend DW, Eberl S, et al. Optimizing injected dose in clinical PET by accurately modeling the counting-rate response functions specific to individual patient scans. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1825–34.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Nagaki A, Onoguchi M, Matsutomo N. Patient weight-based acquisition protocols to optimize (18)F-FDG PET/CT image quality. J Nucl Med Technol. 2011;39:72–6.CrossRefPubMed Nagaki A, Onoguchi M, Matsutomo N. Patient weight-based acquisition protocols to optimize (18)F-FDG PET/CT image quality. J Nucl Med Technol. 2011;39:72–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fukukita H, Senda M, Terauchi T, Suzuki K, Daisaki H, Matsumoto K, et al. Japanese guideline for the oncology FDG-PET/CT data acquisition protocol: synopsis of Version 1.0. Ann Nucl Med. 2010;24:325–34.CrossRefPubMed Fukukita H, Senda M, Terauchi T, Suzuki K, Daisaki H, Matsumoto K, et al. Japanese guideline for the oncology FDG-PET/CT data acquisition protocol: synopsis of Version 1.0. Ann Nucl Med. 2010;24:325–34.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Goerres GW, Burger C, Kamel E, Seifert B, Kaim AH, Buck A, et al. Respiration-induced attenuation artifact at PET/CT: technical considerations. Radiology. 2003;226:906–10.CrossRefPubMed Goerres GW, Burger C, Kamel E, Seifert B, Kaim AH, Buck A, et al. Respiration-induced attenuation artifact at PET/CT: technical considerations. Radiology. 2003;226:906–10.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Iatrou M, Ross SG, Manjeshwar RM, Stearns CW. A fully 3D iterative image reconstruction algorithm incorporating data corrections. In: IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2004, Vol. 4, pp. 2493–97. Iatrou M, Ross SG, Manjeshwar RM, Stearns CW. A fully 3D iterative image reconstruction algorithm incorporating data corrections. In: IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2004, Vol. 4, pp. 2493–97.
9.
go back to reference De Ponti E, Morzenti S, Guerra L, Pasquali C, Arosio M, Bettinardi V, et al. Performance measurements for the PET/CT Discovery-600 using NEMA NU 2-2007 standards. Med Phys. 2011;38:968–74.CrossRefPubMed De Ponti E, Morzenti S, Guerra L, Pasquali C, Arosio M, Bettinardi V, et al. Performance measurements for the PET/CT Discovery-600 using NEMA NU 2-2007 standards. Med Phys. 2011;38:968–74.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Masuda Y, Kondo C, Matsuo Y, Uetani M, Kusakabe K. Comparison of imaging protocols for 18F-FDG PET/CT in overweight patients: optimizing scan duration versus administered dose. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:844–8.CrossRefPubMed Masuda Y, Kondo C, Matsuo Y, Uetani M, Kusakabe K. Comparison of imaging protocols for 18F-FDG PET/CT in overweight patients: optimizing scan duration versus administered dose. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:844–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Image quality and variability for routine diagnostic FDG-PET scans in a Japanese community hospital: current status and possibility of improvement
Authors
Keiji Shimizu
Seiichi Yamamoto
Keiichi Matsumoto
Megumu Hino
Michio Senda
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Japanese Journal of Radiology / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 1867-1071
Electronic ISSN: 1867-108X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-016-0547-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Japanese Journal of Radiology 7/2016 Go to the issue