Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 3/2016

Open Access 01-03-2016 | Original Article

Ileostomy closure by colorectal surgeons results in less major morbidity: results from an institutional change in practice and awareness

Authors: G. D. Musters, J. J. Atema, H. L. van Westreenen, C. J. Buskens, W. A. Bemelman, P. J. Tanis

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Previous institutional analysis of ileostomy closure revealed substantial morbidity. This subsequent study aimed at determining if a change in clinical practice resulted in reduced complication rates.

Methods

Between June 2004 and January 2014, all consecutive adult patients undergoing ileostomy closure were retrospectively identified. Postoperative outcome after change in clinical practice consisting of routine participation of a colorectal surgeon, stapled side-to-side anastomosis and increased clinical awareness (cohort B) was compared with our previously published historical control group (cohort A). The primary outcome was major morbidity, defined as Clavien-Dindo grade three or higher. Independent risk factors of major morbidity were identified using multivariable analysis.

Results

In total, 165 patients underwent ileostomy closure in cohort A, and 144 patients in cohort B. At baseline, more primary diverting ileostomies were present in cohort A (94 vs. 82 %; p = 0.001) with a similar rate of loop and end-ileostomy between the two cohorts (p = 0.331). A significant increase in colorectal surgeon participation (89 vs. 53 %; p < 0.001) and stapled side-to-side anastomosis was observed (63 vs. 16 %; p < 0.001). The major morbidity rate was 11 % in cohort A, which significantly reduced to 4 % in cohort B (p = 0.03). Surgery being performed or supervised by a colorectal surgeon (odds ratio [OR] 0.28, 95 % CI 0.11–0.67) and loop-ileostomy compared to end-ileostomy (OR 0.18, 95 % CI 0.07–0.52) were independently associated with lower major morbidity.

Conclusion

Ileostomy closure appears to be more complex surgery then generally considered, especially end-ileostomy closure. Postoperative outcome could be significantly improved by a change in surgical practice.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Huser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M, Schuster T, Rosenberg R, Kleeff J et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 248(1):52–60CrossRefPubMed Huser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M, Schuster T, Rosenberg R, Kleeff J et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 248(1):52–60CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S (2009) The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(6):711–723CrossRefPubMed Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S (2009) The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(6):711–723CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference van Westreenen HL, Visser A, Tanis PJ, Bemelman WA (2012) Morbidity related to defunctioning ileostomy closure after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and low colonic anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 27(1):49–54CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Westreenen HL, Visser A, Tanis PJ, Bemelman WA (2012) Morbidity related to defunctioning ileostomy closure after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and low colonic anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 27(1):49–54CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Damle RN, Macomber CW, Flahive JM, Davids JS, Sweeney WB, Sturrock PR et al (2014) Surgeon volume and elective resection for colon cancer: an analysis of outcomes and use of laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 218(6):1223–1230CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Damle RN, Macomber CW, Flahive JM, Davids JS, Sweeney WB, Sturrock PR et al (2014) Surgeon volume and elective resection for colon cancer: an analysis of outcomes and use of laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 218(6):1223–1230CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Archampong D, Borowski D, Wille-Jorgensen P, Iversen LH (2012) Workload and surgeon’s specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD005391PubMed Archampong D, Borowski D, Wille-Jorgensen P, Iversen LH (2012) Workload and surgeon’s specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD005391PubMed
7.
go back to reference Maslekar S, Sharma A, Macdonald A, Gunn J, Monson JR, Hartley JE (2006) Do supervised colorectal trainees differ from consultants in terms of quality of TME surgery? Colorectal Dis 8(9):790–794CrossRefPubMed Maslekar S, Sharma A, Macdonald A, Gunn J, Monson JR, Hartley JE (2006) Do supervised colorectal trainees differ from consultants in terms of quality of TME surgery? Colorectal Dis 8(9):790–794CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference van Erning FN, van Steenbergen LN, van den Broek WT, Rutten HJ, Lemmens VE (2013) No difference between lowest and highest volume hospitals in outcome after colorectal cancer surgery in the southern Netherlands. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(11):1199–1206CrossRefPubMed van Erning FN, van Steenbergen LN, van den Broek WT, Rutten HJ, Lemmens VE (2013) No difference between lowest and highest volume hospitals in outcome after colorectal cancer surgery in the southern Netherlands. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(11):1199–1206CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Markides GA, Wijetunga IU, Brown SR, Anwar S (2015) Meta-analysis of handsewn versus stapled reversal of loop ileostomy. ANZ J Surg 85(4):217–24CrossRefPubMed Markides GA, Wijetunga IU, Brown SR, Anwar S (2015) Meta-analysis of handsewn versus stapled reversal of loop ileostomy. ANZ J Surg 85(4):217–24CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Chambers WM, Mortensen NJ (2004) Postoperative leakage and abscess formation after colorectal surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 18(5):865–880CrossRefPubMed Chambers WM, Mortensen NJ (2004) Postoperative leakage and abscess formation after colorectal surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 18(5):865–880CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ (2005) Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 92(9):1150–1154CrossRefPubMed McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ (2005) Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 92(9):1150–1154CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mennigen R, Sewald W, Senninger N, Rijcken E (2014) Morbidity of loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 18(12):2192–200CrossRefPubMed Mennigen R, Sewald W, Senninger N, Rijcken E (2014) Morbidity of loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 18(12):2192–200CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference den Dulk M, Smit M, Peeters KC, Kranenbarg EM, Rutten HJ, Wiggers T et al (2007) A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 8(4):297–303CrossRef den Dulk M, Smit M, Peeters KC, Kranenbarg EM, Rutten HJ, Wiggers T et al (2007) A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 8(4):297–303CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Phang PT, Hain JM, Perez-Ramirez JJ, Madoff RD, Gemlo BT (1999) Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown. Am J Surg 177(6):463–466CrossRefPubMed Phang PT, Hain JM, Perez-Ramirez JJ, Madoff RD, Gemlo BT (1999) Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown. Am J Surg 177(6):463–466CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Pata G, D'Hoore A, Fieuws S, Penninckx F (2009) Mortality risk analysis following routine vs selective defunctioning stoma formation after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 11(8):797–805CrossRefPubMed Pata G, D'Hoore A, Fieuws S, Penninckx F (2009) Mortality risk analysis following routine vs selective defunctioning stoma formation after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 11(8):797–805CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Ileostomy closure by colorectal surgeons results in less major morbidity: results from an institutional change in practice and awareness
Authors
G. D. Musters
J. J. Atema
H. L. van Westreenen
C. J. Buskens
W. A. Bemelman
P. J. Tanis
Publication date
01-03-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2478-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 3/2016 Go to the issue