Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2012

Open Access 01-01-2012 | Original Article

Morbidity related to defunctioning ileostomy closure after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and low colonic anastomosis

Authors: Henderik L. van Westreenen, Annelies Visser, Pieter J. Tanis, Willem A. Bemelman

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Defunctioning ileostomies are widely performed in order to prevent or treat anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. The aim of the present study was to determine morbidity related to stoma closure and to identify predictive factors of a complicated postoperative course.

Methods

A consecutive series of 138 patients were retrospectively analyzed after stoma reversal. Data collection included general demographics and surgery-related aspects. Morbidity related to stoma closure was retrieved from our prospectively collected registry of complications.

Results

In 74 of 138 patients, defunctioning ileostomy was performed after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). The remaining ileostomies (n = 64) were constructed after a low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. A total of 46 complications were recorded in 28 patients resulting in an overall complication rate of 20.3%. Anastomotic leakage rate was 4.3%, and reoperation rate was 8.0%. The number of complications according to the Clavien–Dindo classification was 5 for grade I (10.9%), 26 for grade II (56.5%), 13 for grade III (28.3%), 1 for grade IV (2.2%), and 1 for grade V (2.2%). Multivariate analysis revealed a significantly higher ASA score in the complicated group (P = 0.015, odds ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.2–5.6).

Conclusions

Closure of a defunctioning ileostomy is associated with 20% morbidity and a reoperation rate of 8%. There is an urgent need for criteria on which a more selective use of a defunctioning ileostomy after low colonic anastomosis or IPAA can be based given its associated morbidity.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Huser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M, Schuster T, Rosenberg R, Kleeff J et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 248:52–60PubMedCrossRef Huser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M, Schuster T, Rosenberg R, Kleeff J et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 248:52–60PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sagap I, Remzi FH, Hammel JP, Fazio VW (2006) Factors associated with failure in managing pelvic sepsis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)–a multivariate analysis. Surgery 140:691–703PubMedCrossRef Sagap I, Remzi FH, Hammel JP, Fazio VW (2006) Factors associated with failure in managing pelvic sepsis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)–a multivariate analysis. Surgery 140:691–703PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tan WS, Tang CL, Shi L, Eu KW (2009) Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:462–472PubMedCrossRef Tan WS, Tang CL, Shi L, Eu KW (2009) Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:462–472PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mala T, Nesbakken A (2008) Morbidity related to the use of a protective stoma in anterior resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 10:785–788PubMedCrossRef Mala T, Nesbakken A (2008) Morbidity related to the use of a protective stoma in anterior resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 10:785–788PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nastro P, Knowles CH, McGrath A, Heyman B, Porrett TR, Lunniss PJ (2010) Complications of intestinal stomas. Br J Surg 97:1885–1889PubMedCrossRef Nastro P, Knowles CH, McGrath A, Heyman B, Porrett TR, Lunniss PJ (2010) Complications of intestinal stomas. Br J Surg 97:1885–1889PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S (2009) The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:711–723PubMedCrossRef Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S (2009) The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:711–723PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference den Dulk DM, Smit M, Peeters KC, Kranenbarg EM, Rutten HJ, Wiggers T et al (2007) A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 8:297–303CrossRef den Dulk DM, Smit M, Peeters KC, Kranenbarg EM, Rutten HJ, Wiggers T et al (2007) A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 8:297–303CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Akiyoshi T, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, Kuroyanagi H, Ueno M, Oya M et al (2010) Complications of loop ileostomy closure in patients with rectal tumor. World J Surg 34:1937–1942PubMedCrossRef Akiyoshi T, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, Kuroyanagi H, Ueno M, Oya M et al (2010) Complications of loop ileostomy closure in patients with rectal tumor. World J Surg 34:1937–1942PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Giannakopoulos GF, Veenhof AA, van der Peet DL, Sietses C, Meijerink WJ, Cuesta MA (2009) Morbidity and complications of protective loop ileostomy. Colorectal Dis 11:609–612PubMedCrossRef Giannakopoulos GF, Veenhof AA, van der Peet DL, Sietses C, Meijerink WJ, Cuesta MA (2009) Morbidity and complications of protective loop ileostomy. Colorectal Dis 11:609–612PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Williams LA, Sagar PM, Finan PJ, Burke D (2008) The outcome of loop ileostomy closure: a prospective study. Colorectal Dis 10:460–464PubMedCrossRef Williams LA, Sagar PM, Finan PJ, Burke D (2008) The outcome of loop ileostomy closure: a prospective study. Colorectal Dis 10:460–464PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mansfield SD, Jensen C, Phair AS, Kelly OT, Kelly SB (2008) Complications of loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective cohort analysis of 123 patients. World J Surg 32:2101–2106PubMedCrossRef Mansfield SD, Jensen C, Phair AS, Kelly OT, Kelly SB (2008) Complications of loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective cohort analysis of 123 patients. World J Surg 32:2101–2106PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shelygin YA, Chernyshov SV, Rybakov EG (2010) Stapled ileostomy closure results in reduction of postoperative morbidity. Tech Coloproctol 14:19–23PubMedCrossRef Shelygin YA, Chernyshov SV, Rybakov EG (2010) Stapled ileostomy closure results in reduction of postoperative morbidity. Tech Coloproctol 14:19–23PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Leung TT, MacLean AR, Buie WD, Dixon E (2008) Comparison of stapled versus handsewn loop ileostomy closure: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 12:939–944PubMedCrossRef Leung TT, MacLean AR, Buie WD, Dixon E (2008) Comparison of stapled versus handsewn loop ileostomy closure: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 12:939–944PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference van de Pavoordt HD, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Weakley FL (1987) The outcome of loop ileostomy closure in 293 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 2:214–217PubMedCrossRef van de Pavoordt HD, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Weakley FL (1987) The outcome of loop ileostomy closure in 293 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 2:214–217PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wong KS, Remzi FH, Gorgun E, Arrigain S, Church JM, Preen M et al (2005) Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1,504 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 48:243–250PubMedCrossRef Wong KS, Remzi FH, Gorgun E, Arrigain S, Church JM, Preen M et al (2005) Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1,504 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 48:243–250PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Remzi FH, Fazio VW, Gorgun E, Ooi BS, Hammel J, Preen M et al (2006) The outcome after restorative proctocolectomy with or without defunctioning ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 49:470–477PubMedCrossRef Remzi FH, Fazio VW, Gorgun E, Ooi BS, Hammel J, Preen M et al (2006) The outcome after restorative proctocolectomy with or without defunctioning ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 49:470–477PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246:207–214PubMedCrossRef Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246:207–214PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein KE, Steup WH, Wiggers T et al (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216PubMedCrossRef Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein KE, Steup WH, Wiggers T et al (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Morbidity related to defunctioning ileostomy closure after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and low colonic anastomosis
Authors
Henderik L. van Westreenen
Annelies Visser
Pieter J. Tanis
Willem A. Bemelman
Publication date
01-01-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1276-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2012 Go to the issue