Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Hysteroscopy | Research

The effectiveness of hysteroscopy for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study

Authors: Xinxin You, Yan Ruan, Shouxiang Weng, Chenya Lin, Meifu Gan, Feng Qi

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a long-term complication of cesarean section characterized by the localization of a subsequent gestational sac within the scar area or niche developed as a result of a previous cesarean section. Its incidence has increased substantially because of the high global cesarean section rate in recent decades. Several surgical and drug treatments exist for this condition; however, there is currently no optimal treatment. This study compared the effectiveness of direct hysteroscopic removal of the gestational tissue and hysteroscopy combined with vacuum suction for the treatment of CSP.

Methods

From 2017 to 2023, 521 patients were diagnosed with CSP at our hospital. Of these patients, 45 underwent hysteroscopy. Among them, 28 underwent direct hysteroscopic removal (hysteroscopic removal group) and 17 underwent hysteroscopy combined with vacuum suction (hysteroscopic suction group). The clinical characteristics and outcomes of the hysteroscopic removal group and hysteroscopic suction group were analyzed.

Results

Among the 45 patients, the amount of bleeding and hospitalization cost were significantly higher in the hysteroscopic removal group than in the hysteroscopic suction group (33.8 mL vs. 9.9 mL, P < 0.001; and 8744.0 yuan vs. 5473.8 yuan, P < 0.001; respectively). The operation time and duration of hospitalization were significantly longer in the hysteroscopic removal group than in the hysteroscopic suction group (61.4 min vs. 28.2 min, P < 0.001; and 3.8 days vs. 2.4 days, P = 0.026; respectively). Three patients in the hysteroscopic removal group had uterine perforation and received laparoscopic repair during operation. No complications occurred in the hysteroscopic suction group. One patient in the hysteroscopic removal group received ultrasound-guided suction curettage due to postoperative moderate vaginal bleeding, and one patient in the hysteroscopic suction group received ultrasound-guided suction curettage due to postoperative gestational residue and elevated serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels. Reproductive function was preserved in all patients.

Conclusions

Hysteroscopy is an effective method for treating CSP. Compared with direct hysteroscopic removal, hysteroscopy combined with vacuum suction is more suitable for CSP. However, multicenter prospective studies with large sample sizes are required for verification of these findings.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vial Y, Petignat P, Hohlfeld P. Pregnancy in a cesarean scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16:592–3.CrossRefPubMed Vial Y, Petignat P, Hohlfeld P. Pregnancy in a cesarean scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16:592–3.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Godin PA, Bassil S, Donnez J. An ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous caesarian section scar. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:398–400.CrossRefPubMed Godin PA, Bassil S, Donnez J. An ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous caesarian section scar. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:398–400.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, Lawrence A, Salim R, Elson C. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:220–7.CrossRefPubMed Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, Lawrence A, Salim R, Elson C. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:220–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, Lin MY, Tsai YL, Hwang JL. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:247–53.CrossRefPubMed Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, Lin MY, Tsai YL, Hwang JL. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:247–53.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Riaz RM, Williams TR, Craig BM, Myers DT. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: imaging features, current treatment options, and clinical outcomes. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:2589–99.CrossRefPubMed Riaz RM, Williams TR, Craig BM, Myers DT. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: imaging features, current treatment options, and clinical outcomes. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:2589–99.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gibbons L, Belizan JM, Lauer JA, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:331e1–19.CrossRef Gibbons L, Belizan JM, Lauer JA, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:331e1–19.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:1373–81.CrossRefPubMed Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:1373–81.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Maymon R, Halperin R, Mendlovic S, Schneider D, Vaknin Z, Herman A, et al. Ectopic pregnancies in caesarean section scars: the 8 year experience of one medical centre. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:278–84.CrossRefPubMed Maymon R, Halperin R, Mendlovic S, Schneider D, Vaknin Z, Herman A, et al. Ectopic pregnancies in caesarean section scars: the 8 year experience of one medical centre. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:278–84.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Osborn DA, Williams TR, Craig BM. Cesarean scar pregnancy: Sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings, complications, and treatment. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:1449–56.CrossRefPubMed Osborn DA, Williams TR, Craig BM. Cesarean scar pregnancy: Sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings, complications, and treatment. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:1449–56.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Birch Petersen K, Hoffmann E, Rifbjerg Larsen C, Nielsen HS. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:958–67.CrossRefPubMed Birch Petersen K, Hoffmann E, Rifbjerg Larsen C, Nielsen HS. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:958–67.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A. Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:14–29.CrossRefPubMed Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A. Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:14–29.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Zhou W, Feng X, Yu J, Chai Z, Zheng L, Qi F. The efficacy of different treatments for type 2 cesarean scar pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2022;118:407–13.CrossRefPubMed Zhou W, Feng X, Yu J, Chai Z, Zheng L, Qi F. The efficacy of different treatments for type 2 cesarean scar pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2022;118:407–13.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Miller R, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Society for maternal-fetal medicine consult series #63: cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227:B9–B20.CrossRefPubMed Miller R, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Society for maternal-fetal medicine consult series #63: cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227:B9–B20.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Santos R, Tsymbal T, Pineda G, Arslan AA. The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:44e1–13.CrossRef Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Santos R, Tsymbal T, Pineda G, Arslan AA. The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:44e1–13.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Family planning group of obstetrics and gynecology branch of the chinese medical association. Expert consensus on the diagnosis and management of cesarean scar pregnancy. Chin J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;51:568–72. Family planning group of obstetrics and gynecology branch of the chinese medical association. Expert consensus on the diagnosis and management of cesarean scar pregnancy. Chin J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;51:568–72.
17.
go back to reference Xiao J, Zhang S, Wang F, Wang Y, Shi Z, Zhou X, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: noninvasive and effective treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:356e1–7.CrossRef Xiao J, Zhang S, Wang F, Wang Y, Shi Z, Zhou X, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: noninvasive and effective treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:356e1–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Chai ZY, Yu L, Liu MM, Zhu TW, Qi F. Evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided local lauromacrogol injection combined with aspiration for cesarean scar pregnancy: a novel treatment. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2018;83:306–12.CrossRefPubMed Chai ZY, Yu L, Liu MM, Zhu TW, Qi F. Evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided local lauromacrogol injection combined with aspiration for cesarean scar pregnancy: a novel treatment. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2018;83:306–12.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wu Q, Liu X, Zhu L, Zhu Y, Mei T, Cao S, et al. Clinical assessment of ultrasound-guided local lauromacrogol injection combined with curettage and hysteroscopy for cesarean scar pregnancy. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:601977.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wu Q, Liu X, Zhu L, Zhu Y, Mei T, Cao S, et al. Clinical assessment of ultrasound-guided local lauromacrogol injection combined with curettage and hysteroscopy for cesarean scar pregnancy. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:601977.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Tang Q, Qin Y, Zhou Q, Tang J, Zhou Q, Qiao J, et al. Hysteroscopic treatment and reproductive outcomes in cesarean scar pregnancy: experience at a single institution. Fertil Steril. 2021;116:1559–66.CrossRefPubMed Tang Q, Qin Y, Zhou Q, Tang J, Zhou Q, Qiao J, et al. Hysteroscopic treatment and reproductive outcomes in cesarean scar pregnancy: experience at a single institution. Fertil Steril. 2021;116:1559–66.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Yu XL, Zhang N, Zuo WL. Cesarean scar pregnancy: an analysis of 100 cases. Chin J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;91:3186–9. Yu XL, Zhang N, Zuo WL. Cesarean scar pregnancy: an analysis of 100 cases. Chin J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;91:3186–9.
22.
go back to reference Pan Y, Liu MB. The value of hysteroscopic management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a report of 44 cases. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;56:139–42.CrossRefPubMed Pan Y, Liu MB. The value of hysteroscopic management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a report of 44 cases. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;56:139–42.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Mollo A, Conforti A, Alviggi C, De Placido G. Successful direct bipolar resection of 6th week cesarean scar pregnancy: case report and literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;179:229–31.CrossRefPubMed Mollo A, Conforti A, Alviggi C, De Placido G. Successful direct bipolar resection of 6th week cesarean scar pregnancy: case report and literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;179:229–31.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Chueh HY, Pai AH, Su YY, Hsu CC, Chang FY, Yen CF. Hysteroscopic removal, with or without laparoscopic assistance, of first-trimester cesarean scar pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2022;117:643–5.CrossRefPubMed Chueh HY, Pai AH, Su YY, Hsu CC, Chang FY, Yen CF. Hysteroscopic removal, with or without laparoscopic assistance, of first-trimester cesarean scar pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2022;117:643–5.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Wang DB, Chen YH, Zhang ZF, Chen P, Liu KR, Li Y, et al. Evaluation of the transvaginal resection of low-segment cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:602–6.CrossRefPubMed Wang DB, Chen YH, Zhang ZF, Chen P, Liu KR, Li Y, et al. Evaluation of the transvaginal resection of low-segment cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:602–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The effectiveness of hysteroscopy for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study
Authors
Xinxin You
Yan Ruan
Shouxiang Weng
Chenya Lin
Meifu Gan
Feng Qi
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06344-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2024 Go to the issue