Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Hypertension | Methodology

Sample size re-estimation in crossover trials: application to the AIM HY-INFORM study

Authors: Julie Wych, Michael J. Grayling, Adrian P. Mander

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Crossover designs are commonly utilised in randomised controlled trials investigating treatments for long-term chronic illnesses. One problem with this design is its inherent repeated measures necessitate the availability of an estimate of the within-person standard deviation (SD) to perform a sample size calculation, which may be rarely available at the design stage of a trial. Interim sample size re-estimation designs can be used to help alleviate this issue by adapting the sample size mid-way through the trial, using accrued information in a statistically robust way.

Methods

The AIM HY-INFORM study is part of the Informative Markers in Hypertension (AIM HY) Programme and comprises two crossover trials, each with a planned recruitment of 600 participants. The objective of the study is to test whether blood pressure response to first line antihypertensive treatment depends on ethnicity. An interim analysis is planned to reassess the assumptions of the planned sample size for the study. The aims of this paper are: (1) to provide a formula for sample size re-estimation in both crossover trials; and (2) to present a simulation study of the planned interim analysis to investigate alternative within-person SDs to that assumed.

Results

The AIM HY-INFORM protocol sample size calculation fixes the within-person SD to be 8 mmHg, giving > 90% power for a primary treatment effect of 4 mmHg. Using the method developed here and simulating the interim sample size reassessment, if we were to see a larger within-person SD of 9 mmHg at interim, 640 participants for 90% power 90% of the time in the three-period three-treatment design would be required. Similarly, in the four-period four-treatment crossover design, 602 participants would be required.

Conclusions

The formulas presented here provide a method for re-estimating the sample size in crossover trials. In the context of the AIM HY-INFORM study, simulating the interim analysis allows us to explore the results of a possible increase in the within-person SD from that assumed. Simulations show that without increasing the planned sample size of 600 participants, we can reasonably still expect to achieve 80% power with a small increase in the within-person SD from that assumed.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02847338. Registered on 28 July 2016.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jones B, Kenward MG. Design and analysis of crossover trials. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/ CRC Press; 2014. Jones B, Kenward MG. Design and analysis of crossover trials. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/ CRC Press; 2014.
2.
go back to reference Mukhtar O, Cheriyan J, Cockcroft JR, Collier D, Coulson JM, Dasgupta I, et al. A randomized controlled crossover trial evaluating differential responses to antihypertensive drugs (used as mono- or dual therapy) on the basis of ethnicity: The comparIsoN oF Optimal Hypertension RegiMens; part of the Ancestry Informative Markers in HYpertension program—AIM-HY INFORM trial. Am Heart J. 2018;204:102–8.CrossRef Mukhtar O, Cheriyan J, Cockcroft JR, Collier D, Coulson JM, Dasgupta I, et al. A randomized controlled crossover trial evaluating differential responses to antihypertensive drugs (used as mono- or dual therapy) on the basis of ethnicity: The comparIsoN oF Optimal Hypertension RegiMens; part of the Ancestry Informative Markers in HYpertension program—AIM-HY INFORM trial. Am Heart J. 2018;204:102–8.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Zucker DM, Denne J. Sample-size redetermination for repeated measures studies. Biometrics. 2002;58:548–59.CrossRef Zucker DM, Denne J. Sample-size redetermination for repeated measures studies. Biometrics. 2002;58:548–59.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lenth RV. Some practical guidelines for effective sample size determination. Am Stat. 2001;55(3):187–93.CrossRef Lenth RV. Some practical guidelines for effective sample size determination. Am Stat. 2001;55(3):187–93.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lui GF. Sample size calculations for studies with correlated observations. Biometrics. 1997;53(30):937–47. Lui GF. Sample size calculations for studies with correlated observations. Biometrics. 1997;53(30):937–47.
7.
go back to reference Shih WJ, Gould AL. Re-evaluation design specifications of longitudinal clinical trials without unblinding when the key response is rate of change. Stat Med. 1995;14:2239–48.CrossRef Shih WJ, Gould AL. Re-evaluation design specifications of longitudinal clinical trials without unblinding when the key response is rate of change. Stat Med. 1995;14:2239–48.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Potvin D, DiLiberti CE, Hauck WW, Parr AF, Schuirmann DJ, Smith RA. Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs. Pharm Stat. 2008;7:245–62.CrossRef Potvin D, DiLiberti CE, Hauck WW, Parr AF, Schuirmann DJ, Smith RA. Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs. Pharm Stat. 2008;7:245–62.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Montague TH, Potvin D, Diliberti CE, Hauck WW, Parr AF, Schuirmann DJ. Additional results for ‘Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs’. Pharm Stat. 2012;11:8–13.CrossRef Montague TH, Potvin D, Diliberti CE, Hauck WW, Parr AF, Schuirmann DJ. Additional results for ‘Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs’. Pharm Stat. 2012;11:8–13.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Golkowski D, Friede T, Kieser M. Blinded sample size re-estimation in crossover bioequivalence trials. Pharm Stat. 2014;13:157–62.CrossRef Golkowski D, Friede T, Kieser M. Blinded sample size re-estimation in crossover bioequivalence trials. Pharm Stat. 2014;13:157–62.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Xu J, Audet C, DiLiberti CE, Hauck WW, Montague TH, Parr AF, et al. Optimal adaptive sequential designs for crossover bioequivalence studies. Pharm Stat. 2016;15:15–27.CrossRef Xu J, Audet C, DiLiberti CE, Hauck WW, Montague TH, Parr AF, et al. Optimal adaptive sequential designs for crossover bioequivalence studies. Pharm Stat. 2016;15:15–27.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Grayling MJ, Mander AP, Wason JMS. Blinded and unblinded sample size reestimation in crossover trials balanced for period. Biom J. 2018;60:917–33.CrossRef Grayling MJ, Mander AP, Wason JMS. Blinded and unblinded sample size reestimation in crossover trials balanced for period. Biom J. 2018;60:917–33.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Senn S. Crossover trials in clinical research. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2002.CrossRef Senn S. Crossover trials in clinical research. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2002.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Williams EJ. Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects. Aust J Sci Res. 1949;2:149–68. Williams EJ. Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects. Aust J Sci Res. 1949;2:149–68.
15.
go back to reference Kenward MG, Roger JH. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics. 1997;53:983–97.CrossRef Kenward MG, Roger JH. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics. 1997;53:983–97.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hotelling H. The generalization of Student’s ratio. Ann Math Statist. 1931;2(3):360–78.CrossRef Hotelling H. The generalization of Student’s ratio. Ann Math Statist. 1931;2(3):360–78.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Maas CJM, Hox JJ. Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modelling. Methodology. 2005;1(3):86–92.CrossRef Maas CJM, Hox JJ. Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modelling. Methodology. 2005;1(3):86–92.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, and Ware JH. Applied Longitudinal Analysis, NJ: Wiley. Second edition; 2011.CrossRef Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, and Ware JH. Applied Longitudinal Analysis, NJ: Wiley. Second edition; 2011.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Sample size re-estimation in crossover trials: application to the AIM HY-INFORM study
Authors
Julie Wych
Michael J. Grayling
Adrian P. Mander
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3724-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Trials 1/2019 Go to the issue