Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Human Papillomavirus | Research

Promoter hypermethylation analysis of host genes in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancers on histological cervical specimens

Authors: Liye Shi, Xue Yang, Ling He, Chunying Zheng, Zhen Ren, Juweria Abdisamad Warsame, Suye Suye, Lei Yan, Haiyi Cai, Xiao Xiao, Chun Fu

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

DNA methylation is an essential factor in the progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) to cervical cancer. The aim was to investigate the diagnostic value provided by methylation biomarkers of six tumor suppressor genes (ASTN1, DLX1, ITGA4, RXFP3, SOX17 and ZNF671) for cervical precancerous lesions and cervical cancer.

Methods

The histological cervical specimens of 396 cases including 93 CIN1, 99 CIN2, 93 CIN3 and 111 cervical cancers were tested for methylation-specific PCR assay (GynTect®) of score and positive rate. Among them, 66 CIN1, 93 CIN2, 87 CIN3 and 72 cervical cancers were further used for paired analysis. A chi-square test was used to analyze the difference of methylation score and positive rate in cervical specimens. The paired t-test and paired chi-square test were for analyzing the methylation score and positive rate in paired CIN and cervical cancer cases. The specificity, sensitivity, odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the GynTect® assay for CIN2 or worse (CIN2 +) and CIN3 or worse (CIN3 +) were evaluated.

Results

According to the chi-square test trend, hypermethylation increased with severity of the lesions as defined by histological grading (P = 0.000). The methylation score above 1.1 was more common in CIN2 + than in CIN1. The DNA methylation scores in the paired groups of CIN1, CIN3 and cervical cancer were significant differences (P = 0.033, 0.000 and 0.000, respectively), except for CIN2 (P = 0.171). While the positive rate of GynTect® in each paired group had no difference (all P > 0.05). The positive rate of every methylation marker in the GynTect® assay showed differences in four cervical lesion groups (all P < 0.05). The specificity of GynTect® assay for detection of CIN2 + /CIN3 + were higher than high-risk human papillomavirus test. With CIN1 as a reference, the positive status of GynTect®/ZNF671 were significantly higher in CIN2 + : odds ratio (OR) 5.271/OR 13.909, and in CIN3 + : OR 11.022/OR 39.150, (all P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The promoter methylation of six tumor suppressor genes is related to the severity of cervical lesions. The GynTect® assay based on cervical specimens provides diagnostic values for detecting CIN2 + and CIN3 + .
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bray F, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.CrossRefPubMed Bray F, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Del Pino M, et al. CADM1, MAL, and miR124 Promoter Methylation as Biomarkers of Transforming Cervical Intrapithelial Lesions. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(9):2262.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Del Pino M, et al. CADM1, MAL, and miR124 Promoter Methylation as Biomarkers of Transforming Cervical Intrapithelial Lesions. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(9):2262.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Steenbergen R, et al. Clinical implications of (epi)genetic changes in HPV-induced cervical precancerous lesions. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(6):395–405.CrossRefPubMed Steenbergen R, et al. Clinical implications of (epi)genetic changes in HPV-induced cervical precancerous lesions. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(6):395–405.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Vink F, et al. Classification of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by p16, Ki-67, HPV E4 and FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation status demonstrates considerable heterogeneity with potential consequences for management. Int J Cancer. 2021;149(3):707–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vink F, et al. Classification of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by p16, Ki-67, HPV E4 and FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation status demonstrates considerable heterogeneity with potential consequences for management. Int J Cancer. 2021;149(3):707–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Kremer W, et al. Characterization of cervical biopsies of women with HIV and HPV co-infection using p16, ki-67 and HPV E4 immunohistochemistry and DNA methylation. Mod Pathol. 2020;33(10):1968–78.CrossRefPubMed Kremer W, et al. Characterization of cervical biopsies of women with HIV and HPV co-infection using p16, ki-67 and HPV E4 immunohistochemistry and DNA methylation. Mod Pathol. 2020;33(10):1968–78.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fang J, Zhang H, Jin S. Epigenetics and cervical cancer: from pathogenesis to therapy. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(6):5083–93.CrossRefPubMed Fang J, Zhang H, Jin S. Epigenetics and cervical cancer: from pathogenesis to therapy. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(6):5083–93.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bowden S, et al. The use of human papillomavirus DNA methylation in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EBioMedicine. 2019;50:246–59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bowden S, et al. The use of human papillomavirus DNA methylation in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EBioMedicine. 2019;50:246–59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Kremer W, et al. The use of host cell DNA methylation analysis in the detection and management of women with advanced cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a review. BJOG. 2021;128(3):504–14.CrossRefPubMed Kremer W, et al. The use of host cell DNA methylation analysis in the detection and management of women with advanced cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a review. BJOG. 2021;128(3):504–14.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Verlaat W, et al. Host-cell DNA methylation patterns during high-risk HPV-induced carcinogenesis reveal a heterogeneous nature of cervical pre-cancer. Epigenetics. 2018;13(7):769–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Verlaat W, et al. Host-cell DNA methylation patterns during high-risk HPV-induced carcinogenesis reveal a heterogeneous nature of cervical pre-cancer. Epigenetics. 2018;13(7):769–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Huang S, et al. Association Study Between Methylation in the Promoter Regions of cGAS, MAVS, and TRAF3 Genes and the Risk of Cervical Precancerous Lesions and Cervical Cancer in a Southern Chinese Population. Front Genet. 2019;10:1123.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huang S, et al. Association Study Between Methylation in the Promoter Regions of cGAS, MAVS, and TRAF3 Genes and the Risk of Cervical Precancerous Lesions and Cervical Cancer in a Southern Chinese Population. Front Genet. 2019;10:1123.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Liang H, et al. The application value of PAX1 and ZNF582 gene methylation in high grade intraepithelial lesion and cervical cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2021;23(2):283–8.CrossRefPubMed Liang H, et al. The application value of PAX1 and ZNF582 gene methylation in high grade intraepithelial lesion and cervical cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2021;23(2):283–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Mersakova S, et al. DNA methylation and detection of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions using molecular methods. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(1):23–7.CrossRefPubMed Mersakova S, et al. DNA methylation and detection of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions using molecular methods. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(1):23–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference El Aliani A, et al. Association between Gene Promoter Methylation and Cervical Cancer Development: Global Distribution and A Meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021;30(3):450–9.CrossRefPubMed El Aliani A, et al. Association between Gene Promoter Methylation and Cervical Cancer Development: Global Distribution and A Meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021;30(3):450–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kremer WW, et al. Role of FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation analysis in predicting regression or non-regression of CIN2/3 lesions: a protocol of an observational longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e029017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kremer WW, et al. Role of FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation analysis in predicting regression or non-regression of CIN2/3 lesions: a protocol of an observational longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e029017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Hansel A, et al. A promising DNA methylation signature for the triage of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA-positive women. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(3):e91905.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hansel A, et al. A promising DNA methylation signature for the triage of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA-positive women. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(3):e91905.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Schmitz M, et al. Performance of a DNA methylation marker panel using liquid-based cervical scrapes to detect cervical cancer and its precancerous stages. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):1197.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schmitz M, et al. Performance of a DNA methylation marker panel using liquid-based cervical scrapes to detect cervical cancer and its precancerous stages. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):1197.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
19.
go back to reference Darragh T, et al. The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization project for HPV-associated lesions: background and consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2013;32(1):76–115.CrossRefPubMed Darragh T, et al. The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization project for HPV-associated lesions: background and consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2013;32(1):76–115.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, Young RH, editors. WHO Classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2014. Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, Young RH, editors. WHO Classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2014.
21.
go back to reference Lax S. New features in the 2014 WHO classification of uterine neoplasms. Pathologe. 2016;37(6):500–11.CrossRefPubMed Lax S. New features in the 2014 WHO classification of uterine neoplasms. Pathologe. 2016;37(6):500–11.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Villegas-Hinojosa E, et al. Histopathological Diagnosis of Cervical Biopsies: Reduction of Sampling Errors with the Evaluation of a Third Histologic Level. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:5099–104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Villegas-Hinojosa E, et al. Histopathological Diagnosis of Cervical Biopsies: Reduction of Sampling Errors with the Evaluation of a Third Histologic Level. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:5099–104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Wu M, et al. The Diagnostic Utility of p16 Immunostaining in Differentiating Cancer and HSIL from LSIL and Benign in Cervical Cells. Cell Transplant. 2019;28(2):195–200.CrossRefPubMed Wu M, et al. The Diagnostic Utility of p16 Immunostaining in Differentiating Cancer and HSIL from LSIL and Benign in Cervical Cells. Cell Transplant. 2019;28(2):195–200.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Arvizo C, et al. p16 Immunohistochemistry in Colposcope-Directed and Random Cervical Biopsies of CIN2 and CIN3. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2016;20(3):197–200.CrossRefPubMed Arvizo C, et al. p16 Immunohistochemistry in Colposcope-Directed and Random Cervical Biopsies of CIN2 and CIN3. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2016;20(3):197–200.CrossRefPubMed
25.
26.
go back to reference Liang LA, et al. Cervical Cancer Screening: Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear Test, Liquid-Based Cytology, and Human Papillomavirus Testing as Stand-alone or Cotesting Strategies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021;30(3):474–84.CrossRefPubMed Liang LA, et al. Cervical Cancer Screening: Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear Test, Liquid-Based Cytology, and Human Papillomavirus Testing as Stand-alone or Cotesting Strategies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021;30(3):474–84.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Kaljouw S, et al. Reducing unnecessary referrals for colposcopy in hrHPV-positive women within the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: A modelling study. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;160(3):713–20.CrossRefPubMed Kaljouw S, et al. Reducing unnecessary referrals for colposcopy in hrHPV-positive women within the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: A modelling study. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;160(3):713–20.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Klischke L, et al. Performance of a six-methylation-marker assay on self-collected cervical samples - A feasibility study. J Virol Methods. 2021;295:114219.CrossRefPubMed Klischke L, et al. Performance of a six-methylation-marker assay on self-collected cervical samples - A feasibility study. J Virol Methods. 2021;295:114219.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Bonde JH, et al. Clinical Utility of Human Papillomavirus Genotyping in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020;24(1):1–13.CrossRefPubMed Bonde JH, et al. Clinical Utility of Human Papillomavirus Genotyping in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020;24(1):1–13.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Zhang J, et al. ZNF671Epigenetic-Mediated Downregulation of Zinc Finger Protein 671 () Predicts Poor Prognosis in Multiple Solid Tumors. Front Oncol. 2019;9:342.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang J, et al. ZNF671Epigenetic-Mediated Downregulation of Zinc Finger Protein 671 () Predicts Poor Prognosis in Multiple Solid Tumors. Front Oncol. 2019;9:342.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Burley M, Roberts S, Parish J. Epigenetic regulation of human papillomavirus transcription in the productive virus life cycle. Semi Immunopathol. 2020;42(2):159–71.CrossRef Burley M, Roberts S, Parish J. Epigenetic regulation of human papillomavirus transcription in the productive virus life cycle. Semi Immunopathol. 2020;42(2):159–71.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Dick S, et al. Evaluation of six methylation markers derived from genome-wide screens for detection of cervical precancer and cancer. Epigenomics. 2020;12(18):1569–78.CrossRefPubMed Dick S, et al. Evaluation of six methylation markers derived from genome-wide screens for detection of cervical precancer and cancer. Epigenomics. 2020;12(18):1569–78.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Kelly H, et al. Performance of DNA methylation assays for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2019;121(11):954–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kelly H, et al. Performance of DNA methylation assays for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2019;121(11):954–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Promoter hypermethylation analysis of host genes in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancers on histological cervical specimens
Authors
Liye Shi
Xue Yang
Ling He
Chunying Zheng
Zhen Ren
Juweria Abdisamad Warsame
Suye Suye
Lei Yan
Haiyi Cai
Xiao Xiao
Chun Fu
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10628-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Cancer 1/2023 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine