Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2019

01-05-2019 | Human Papillomavirus | Gynecologic Oncology

Compare two different usages of FRD for detecting high-grade cervical lesions and invasive cancer

Authors: Yuping Dai, Lirong Wang, Donghong Li

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate two usages of the folate receptor-mediated staining solution (FRD) for detecting high-grade cervical lesions and invasive cancer, and compared with cytology test (TCT) and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing.

Methods

FRD sampling and FRD direct staining methods were used for detecting high-grade cervical lesions and invasive cancer. As a comparison, TCT and HPV testing were also applied for screening high-grade cervical lesions and invasive cancer. The sensitivity and specificity of TCT, HPV testing, and staining results of FRD were analyzed by the SPSS software.

Results

In this study, 317 patients with biopsy were collected. The positive rate of FRD sampling method was 35.33% (112/317), and positive rate of FRD direct staining was 48.90% (155/317). Area under the curve (AUC) of TCT, HPV testing, FRD sampling and FRD direct staining were 0.53, 0.55, 0.58, and 0.75, respectively. The sensitivity of TCT, HPV, FRD sampling and FRD direct staining was 69.72%, 97.25%, 64.22% and 81.65%, respectively, and the specificity was 37.98%, 12.98%, 79.81% and 68.27%, respectively.

Conclusion

Compared with TCT and HPV testing, two usages of FRD methods have compatible sensitivity and high specificity to detect high-grade cervical lesions and invasive cancer. FRD direct staining may be comfortable for routine cervical cancer screening
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90CrossRef Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hu Z, Zhu D, Wang W et al (2015) Genome-wide profiling of HPV integration in cervical cancer identifies clustered genomic hot spots and a potential microhomology-mediated integration mechanism. Nat Genet 47:158CrossRefPubMed Hu Z, Zhu D, Wang W et al (2015) Genome-wide profiling of HPV integration in cervical cancer identifies clustered genomic hot spots and a potential microhomology-mediated integration mechanism. Nat Genet 47:158CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Organization WH (2005) IARC handbooks of cancer prevention, vol 10. Cervix cancer screening, pp 117–120. Organization WH (2005) IARC handbooks of cancer prevention, vol 10. Cervix cancer screening, pp 117–120.
5.
go back to reference Berkhof J, Meijer CJ (2007) Human papillomavirus DNA versus papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 358:642 (author reply 3) Berkhof J, Meijer CJ (2007) Human papillomavirus DNA versus papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 358:642 (author reply 3)
6.
go back to reference Naucler P, Ryd W, Törnberg S et al (2008) Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 357:1589CrossRef Naucler P, Ryd W, Törnberg S et al (2008) Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 357:1589CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nanda K, Mccrory DC, Myers ER et al (2000) Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 132:810CrossRefPubMed Nanda K, Mccrory DC, Myers ER et al (2000) Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 132:810CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Staples M (2014) HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer. Lancet 383:1294CrossRef Staples M (2014) HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer. Lancet 383:1294CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zhang CH, Xue XL, Dang RF, Gynecology DO (2014) Application value of folate receptor mediated FRD in diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer. Chin J Lab Diagn 8:7830–7836 Zhang CH, Xue XL, Dang RF, Gynecology DO (2014) Application value of folate receptor mediated FRD in diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer. Chin J Lab Diagn 8:7830–7836
10.
go back to reference Lu MH, Hu LY, Du XX et al (2014) An special epithelial staining agents: folic acid receptor-mediated diagnosis (FRD) effectively and conveniently screen patients with cervical cancer. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:7830 Lu MH, Hu LY, Du XX et al (2014) An special epithelial staining agents: folic acid receptor-mediated diagnosis (FRD) effectively and conveniently screen patients with cervical cancer. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:7830
11.
go back to reference Anonymous (2010) The 1991 bethesda system for reporting cervical/vaginal cytological diagnoses. Diagn Cytopathol 9:235–246 Anonymous (2010) The 1991 bethesda system for reporting cervical/vaginal cytological diagnoses. Diagn Cytopathol 9:235–246
12.
go back to reference Bosch FX, Broker TR, Forman D et al (2013) Comprehensive control of human papillomavirus infections and related diseases. Vaccine 31(Suppl 5):F1CrossRefPubMed Bosch FX, Broker TR, Forman D et al (2013) Comprehensive control of human papillomavirus infections and related diseases. Vaccine 31(Suppl 5):F1CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Davey E, Denton (2007) Accuracy of reading liquid based cytology slides using the ThinPrep Imager compared with conventional cytology: prospective study. BMJ 335:31–35CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Davey E, Denton (2007) Accuracy of reading liquid based cytology slides using the ThinPrep Imager compared with conventional cytology: prospective study. BMJ 335:31–35CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Akamatsu S, Kodama S, Himeji Y, Ikuta N, Shimagaki N (2012) A comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology in cervical cancer screening. Acta Cytol 56:370–374CrossRefPubMed Akamatsu S, Kodama S, Himeji Y, Ikuta N, Shimagaki N (2012) A comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology in cervical cancer screening. Acta Cytol 56:370–374CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Girianelli VR, Thuler LC, Szklo M et al (2006) Comparison of human papillomavirus DNA tests, liquid-based cytology and conventional cytology for the early detection of cervix uteri cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev 15:504–510CrossRefPubMed Girianelli VR, Thuler LC, Szklo M et al (2006) Comparison of human papillomavirus DNA tests, liquid-based cytology and conventional cytology for the early detection of cervix uteri cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev 15:504–510CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kitchener HC, Gilham C, Sargent A et al (2011) A comparison of HPV DNA testing and liquid based cytology over three rounds of primary cervical screening: extended follow up in the ARTISTIC trial. Eur J Cancer 47:864CrossRefPubMed Kitchener HC, Gilham C, Sargent A et al (2011) A comparison of HPV DNA testing and liquid based cytology over three rounds of primary cervical screening: extended follow up in the ARTISTIC trial. Eur J Cancer 47:864CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ronco G, Cuzick J, Pierotti P et al (2007) Accuracy of liquid based versus conventional cytology: overall results of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 335:28CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ronco G, Cuzick J, Pierotti P et al (2007) Accuracy of liquid based versus conventional cytology: overall results of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 335:28CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Low PS, Henne WA, Doorneweerd DD (2008) Discovery and development of folic-acid-based receptor targeting for imaging and therapy of cancer and inflammatory diseases. Acc Chem Res 41:120–129CrossRefPubMed Low PS, Henne WA, Doorneweerd DD (2008) Discovery and development of folic-acid-based receptor targeting for imaging and therapy of cancer and inflammatory diseases. Acc Chem Res 41:120–129CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Compare two different usages of FRD for detecting high-grade cervical lesions and invasive cancer
Authors
Yuping Dai
Lirong Wang
Donghong Li
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05078-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2019 Go to the issue