Skip to main content
Top
Published in: AIDS Research and Therapy 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Human Immunodeficiency Virus | Research

Predictors of virologic outcome among people living with HIV who continue a protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral regimen following virologic failure with no or limited resistance

Authors: Robert A. Salata, Beatriz Grinsztejn, Justin Ritz, Ann C. Collier, Evelyn Hogg, Robert Gross, Catherine Godfrey, Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy, Cecilia Kanyama, John W. Mellors, Carole L. Wallis, Michael D. Hughes, the ACTG A5288 Study Team

Published in: AIDS Research and Therapy | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Treatment management after repeated failure of antiretroviral therapy (ART) is difficult due to resistance and adherence challenges. For people who have failed non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-(NNRTI-) and protease inhibitor-(PI-) based regimens with no or limited resistance, remaining on PI-based ART is an option. Using data from an ART strategy trial (A5288) in low/middle-income countries which included this option, we explored whether predictors can be identified distinguishing those who experienced further virologic failure from those who achieved and maintained virologic suppression.

Methods

A5288 enrolled people with confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≥ 1000 copies/mL after ≥ 24 weeks of PI-based ART and prior failure on NNRTI-based ART. This analysis focused on the 278 participants with no resistance to the PI being taken and no or limited nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance, who continued their PI with flexibility to change NRTIs. Proportional hazards models were used to evaluate predictors of virologic failure during follow-up (VF: confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≥ 1000 copies/mL at ≥ 24 weeks of follow-up).

Results

56% of participants were female. At study entry, median age was 40 years, time on ART 7.8 years, CD4 count 169 cells/mm3, HIV-1 RNA 20,444 copies/mL; and 37% had NRTI resistance. The estimated proportion experiencing VF increased from 39% at week 24 to 60% at week 96. In multivariable analysis, significant predictors at study entry of VF were higher HIV-1 RNA (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.20 for ≥ 10,000 versus < 10,000 copies/mL), lower age (1.96 for < 30 versus ≥ 30 years), NRTI resistance (1.74 for present versus absent), lower CD4 count (1.73 for < 200 versus ≥ 200 cells/mm3), and shorter ART duration (1.62 for < 10 versus ≥ 10 years). There was a strong trend in proportion with VF at week 96 with the number of these five risk factors that a participant had, varying from 8% for zero, to 31%, 40%, 73%, and 100% for one, two, three, and four/five. Only 13% of participants developed new NRTI or PI resistance mutations.

Conclusion

A simple count of five predictors might have value for identifying risk of continued VF. Novel antiretroviral and adherence support interventions are needed to improve virologic outcomes for higher risk individuals.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gupta A, Junerja S, Vitoria M, et al. Projected uptake of new antiretroviral (ARV) medicines in adults in low- and middle-income countries; a forecast analysis 2015–2025. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0164619.CrossRef Gupta A, Junerja S, Vitoria M, et al. Projected uptake of new antiretroviral (ARV) medicines in adults in low- and middle-income countries; a forecast analysis 2015–2025. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0164619.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cambiano V, Bertagnolio S, Jordan MR, et al. Predicted levels of HIV drug resistance: potential impact of expanding diagnosis, retention, and eligibility criteria for antiretroviral therapy initiation. AIDS. 2014;28(Suppl 1):15–23.CrossRef Cambiano V, Bertagnolio S, Jordan MR, et al. Predicted levels of HIV drug resistance: potential impact of expanding diagnosis, retention, and eligibility criteria for antiretroviral therapy initiation. AIDS. 2014;28(Suppl 1):15–23.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Khan S, Das M, Andries A, et al. Second-line failure and first experience with third-line antiretroviral therapy in Mumbai, India. Global Health Action. 2014;7:24861.CrossRef Khan S, Das M, Andries A, et al. Second-line failure and first experience with third-line antiretroviral therapy in Mumbai, India. Global Health Action. 2014;7:24861.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Grinsztejn B, Hughes MD, Ritz J, et al. Third-line antiretroviral therapy in low-income and middle-income countries (ACTG A5288): a prospective strategy study. Lancet HIV. 2019;6(9):e588–600.CrossRef Grinsztejn B, Hughes MD, Ritz J, et al. Third-line antiretroviral therapy in low-income and middle-income countries (ACTG A5288): a prospective strategy study. Lancet HIV. 2019;6(9):e588–600.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gross R, Ritz J, Hughes MD, et al. Two-way mobile phone intervention compared to standard-of-care adherence support after second-line antiretroviral failure: a multinational, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Digit Health. 2019;1:e26–34.CrossRef Gross R, Ritz J, Hughes MD, et al. Two-way mobile phone intervention compared to standard-of-care adherence support after second-line antiretroviral failure: a multinational, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Digit Health. 2019;1:e26–34.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Liu TF, Shafer RW. Web resources for HIV type 1 genotypic-resistance test interpretation. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(11):1608–18.CrossRef Liu TF, Shafer RW. Web resources for HIV type 1 genotypic-resistance test interpretation. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(11):1608–18.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Edessa D, Sisay M, Asefa F. Second-line HIV treatment failure in sub-saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plus One. 2019;14(7):e0220159.CrossRef Edessa D, Sisay M, Asefa F. Second-line HIV treatment failure in sub-saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plus One. 2019;14(7):e0220159.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ndahimana JD, Riedel DJ, Mahayimpundu R, et al. HIV drug resistance mutations among patients failing second-line antitetroviral therapy in Rwanda. Antivir Ther. 2016;21(3):253–9.CrossRef Ndahimana JD, Riedel DJ, Mahayimpundu R, et al. HIV drug resistance mutations among patients failing second-line antitetroviral therapy in Rwanda. Antivir Ther. 2016;21(3):253–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Maiga AI, Fofana DB, Cisse M, et al. Characterization of HIV-1 antiretroviral drug resistance after second-line treatment failure in Mali, a limited-resources setting. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(12):2943–8.CrossRef Maiga AI, Fofana DB, Cisse M, et al. Characterization of HIV-1 antiretroviral drug resistance after second-line treatment failure in Mali, a limited-resources setting. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(12):2943–8.CrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference World Health Organization. HIV and adolescents: guidance for HIV testing and counselling and care for adolescents living with HIV: recommendations for a public health approach and considerations for policy-makers and managers. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. World Health Organization. HIV and adolescents: guidance for HIV testing and counselling and care for adolescents living with HIV: recommendations for a public health approach and considerations for policy-makers and managers. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
16.
go back to reference Almeida-Brasil CC, Moodie EE, Cardoso TS, Nascimento ED, Ceccato MDGB. Comparison of the predictive performance of adherence measures for virologic failure detection in people living with HIV: a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis. AIDS Care. 2019;31(6):647–59.CrossRef Almeida-Brasil CC, Moodie EE, Cardoso TS, Nascimento ED, Ceccato MDGB. Comparison of the predictive performance of adherence measures for virologic failure detection in people living with HIV: a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis. AIDS Care. 2019;31(6):647–59.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Godfrey C, Hughes MD, Ritz J, et al. Sex differences in outcomes for individuals presenting for third-line antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020;84(1):203–7.CrossRef Godfrey C, Hughes MD, Ritz J, et al. Sex differences in outcomes for individuals presenting for third-line antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020;84(1):203–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Domingo P, Mateo MG, Guiterrez MDM. Tolerability of current antiretroviral single-tablet regimens. AIDS Rev. 2018;20(3):141–9. Domingo P, Mateo MG, Guiterrez MDM. Tolerability of current antiretroviral single-tablet regimens. AIDS Rev. 2018;20(3):141–9.
Metadata
Title
Predictors of virologic outcome among people living with HIV who continue a protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral regimen following virologic failure with no or limited resistance
Authors
Robert A. Salata
Beatriz Grinsztejn
Justin Ritz
Ann C. Collier
Evelyn Hogg
Robert Gross
Catherine Godfrey
Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy
Cecilia Kanyama
John W. Mellors
Carole L. Wallis
Michael D. Hughes
the ACTG A5288 Study Team
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
AIDS Research and Therapy / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1742-6405
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-022-00494-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

AIDS Research and Therapy 1/2023 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine