Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2011

01-01-2011 | Original Research

How Well Do Doctors Know their Patients? Factors Affecting Physician Understanding of Patients’ Health Beliefs

Authors: Richard L. Street Jr, PhD, Paul Haidet, MD, MPH

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An important feature of patient-centered care is physician understanding of their patients’ health beliefs and values.

OBJECTIVE

Determine physicians’ awareness of patients’ health beliefs as well as communication, relationship, and demographic factors associated with better physician understanding of patients’ illness perspectives.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, observational study.

RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample of 207 patients and 29 primary care physicians from 10 outpatient clinics.

APPROACH AND MEASURES

After their consultation, patients and physicians independently completed the CONNECT instrument, a measure that assesses beliefs about the degree to which the patient’s condition has a biological cause, is the patient’s fault, is one the patient can control, has meaning for the patient, can be treated with natural remedies, and patient preferences for a partnership with the physician. Physicians completed the measure again on how they thought the patient responded. Active patient participation (frequency of questions, concerns, acts of assertiveness) was coded from audio-recordings of the consultations. Physicians’ answers for how they thought the patient responded to the health belief measure were compared to their patients’ actual responses. Degree of physician understanding of patients’ health beliefs was computed as the absolute difference between patients’ health beliefs and physicians’ perception of patients’ health beliefs.

KEY RESULTS

Physicians’ perceptions of their patients’ health beliefs differed significantly (P < 0.001) from patients’ actual beliefs. Physicians also thought patients’ beliefs were more aligned with their own. Physicians had a better understanding of the degree to which patients believed their health conditions had personal meaning (p = 0.001), would benefit from natural remedies (p = 0.049), were conditions the patient could control (p = 0.001), and wanted a partnership with the doctor (p = 0.014) when patients more often asked questions, expressed concerns, and stated their opinions. Physicians were poorer judges of patients’ beliefs when patients were African-American (desire for partnership) (p = 0.013), Hispanic (meaning) (p = 0.075), or of a different race (sense of control) (p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians were not good judges of patient’s health beliefs, but had a substantially better understanding when patients more actively participated in the consultation. Strategies for increasing physicians’ awareness of patients’ health beliefs include preconsultation assessment of patients’ beliefs, implementing culturally appropriate patient activation programs, and greater use of partnership-building to encourage active patient participation.
Literature
1.
Epstein RM, Street RL Jr. Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Promoting Healing and Reducing Suffering. NIH Publication No. 07–6225.. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2007.
2.
3.
Fishbein M, Cappella JN. The role of theory in developing effective health communications. Journal of Communication. 2006;56:S1–17.CrossRef
4.
Godin G, Kok G. The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health-related behaviors. Am J Health Promot. 1996;11:87–98.PubMed
5.
Janz NK, Becker MH. The Health Belief Model: a decade later. Health Educ Q. 1984;11:1–47.PubMed
6.
Collins DL, Street RL Jr. A dialogic model of conversations about risk: Coordinating perceptions and achieving quality decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:1506–12.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50:892–9.PubMed
8.
Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, Mangione S, Vergare M, Magee M. Physician empathy: definition, components, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:1563–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Mercer SW, McConnachie A, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt GC. Relevance and practical use of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in general practice. Fam Pract. 2005;22:328–34.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Epstein RM, Hadee T, Carroll J, Meldrum SC, Lardner J, Shields CG. "Could this be something serious?" Reassurance, uncertainty, and empathy in response to patients' expressions of worry. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1731–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zachariae R, Pedersen CG, Jensen AB, Ehrnrooth E, Rossen PB, von der Maase H. Association of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self-efficacy, and perceived control over the disease. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:658–65.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Street RL Jr, Richardson MN, Cox V, Suarez-Almazor ME. (Mis)understanding in patient-health care provider communication about total knee replacement. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:100–7.PubMed
13.
Bruera E, Willey JS, Palmer JL, Rosales M. Treatment decisions for breast carcinoma: patient preferences and physician perceptions. Cancer. 2002;94:2076–80.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Jackson JL. Communication about symptoms in primary care: impact on patient outcomes. J Altern Complement Med. 2005;11 Suppl 1:S51–6.PubMed
15.
Staiger TO, Jarvik JG, Deyo RA, Martin B, Braddock CH III. BRIEF REPORT: Patient-physician agreement as a predictor of outcomes in patients with back pain. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:935–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Starfield B, Wray C, Hess K, Gross R, Birk PS, D'Lugoff BC. The influence of patient-practitioner agreement on outcome of care. Am J Public Health. 1981;71:127–31.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Strull WM, Lo B, Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making? JAMA. 1984;252:2990–4.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Willems S, De MS, Deveugele M, Derese A, De MJ. Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor-patient communication: does it make a difference? Patient Educ Couns. 2005;56:139–46.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Suarez-Almazor ME, Conner-Spady B, Kendall CJ, Russell AS, Skeith K. Lack of congruence in the ratings of patients' health status by patients and their physicians. Med Decis Making. 2001;21:113–21.PubMed
20.
Teno JM, Hakim RB, Knaus WA, et al. Preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: physician-patient agreement and hospital resource use. The SUPPORT Investigators. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:179–86.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Quirt CF, Mackillop WJ, Ginsburg AD, et al. Do doctors know when their patients don't? A survey of doctor-patient communication in lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 1997;18:1–20.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Kelly PA, Haidet P. Physician overestimation of patient literacy: a potential source of health care disparities. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66:119–22.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Hall JA, Stein TS, Roter DL, Rieser N. Inaccuracies in physicians' perceptions of their patients. Med Care. 1999;37:1164–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Butow PN, Brown RF, Cogar S, Tattersall MH, Dunn SM. Oncologists' reactions to cancer patients' verbal cues. Psychooncology. 2002;11:47–58.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Hall JA, Horgan TG, Stein TS, Roter DL. Liking in the physician–patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48:69–77.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Street RL Jr, Gordon H, Haidet P. Physicians' communication and perceptions of patients: Is it how they look, how they talk, or is it just the doctor? Soc Sci Med. 2007;65:586–98.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Haidet P, O'Malley KJ, Sharf BF, Gladney AP, Greisinger AJ, Street RL Jr. Characterizing explanatory models of illness in healthcare: development and validation of the CONNECT instrument. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:232–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Street RL Jr. Active patients as powerful communicators. In: Robinson WP, Giles H, eds. The new handbook of language and social psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2001:541–60.
29.
Street RL Jr, Millay B. Analyzing patient participation in medical encounters. Health Communication. 2001;13(1):61–73.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Street RL Jr, Cauthen D, Buchwald E, Wiprud R. Patients' predispositions to discuss health issues affecting quality of life. Fam Med. 1995;27:663–70.PubMed
31.
32.
Cooper-Patrick L, Gallo JJ, Gonzales JJ, et al. Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 1999;282:583–9.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Cooper LA, Roter DL, Johnson RL, Ford DE, Steinwachs DM, Powe NR. Patient-centered communication, ratings of care, and concordance of patient and physician race. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2003;139:907–15.PubMed
34.
Garcia JA, Paterniti DA, Romano PS, Kravitz RL. Patient preferences for physician characteristics in university-based primary care clinics. Ethn Dis. 2003;13:259–67.PubMed
35.
van Ryn M, Burke J. The effect of patient race and socio-economic status on physicians' perceptions of patients. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:813–28.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Beach MC, Roter DL, Wang NY, Duggan PS, Cooper LA. Are physicians' attitudes of respect accurately perceived by patients and associated with more positive communication behaviors? Patient Educ Couns. 2006;62:347–54.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Gordon HS, Street RL Jr, Sharf BF, Souchek J. Racial differences in doctors' information-giving and patients' participation. Cancer. 2006;107:1313–20.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Kleinman A. Patients and healers in the context of culture. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1980.
39.
Leventhal H, Diefenbach MA, Leventhal EA. Illness cognition: using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 1992;16:143–63.CrossRef
40.
Cegala DJ, Street RL Jr, Clinch CR. The impact of patient participation on physicians' information provision during a primary care medical interview. Health Commun. 2007;21:177–85.PubMed
41.
Krupat E, Irish JT, Kasten LE, et al. Patient assertiveness and physician decision-making among older breast cancer patients. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:449–57.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Epstein RM, Franks P, Fiscella K, et al. Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: Theoretical and practical issues. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:1516–28.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Martin E, Russell D, Goodwin S, Chapman R, North M, Sheridan P. Why patients consult and what happens when they do. BMJ. 1991;303:289–92.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Heisler M, Vijan S, Anderson RM, Ubel PA, Bernstein SJ, Hofer TP. When do patients and their physicians agree on diabetes treatment goals and strategies, and what difference does it make? J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:893–902.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Cegala DJ, Gade C, Lenzmeier BS, McClure L. Physicians' and patients' perceptions of patients' communication competence in a primary care medical interview. Health Commun. 2004;16:289–304.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Ogden J, Fuks K, Gardner M, et al. Doctors expressions of uncertainty and patient confidence. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48:171–6.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Rohrbaugh M, Rogers JC. What did the doctor do? When physicians and patients disagree. Arch Fam Med. 1994;3:125–8.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Bruera E, Sweeney C, Calder K, Palmer L, Benisch-Tolley S. Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2001; 2883-2885.
49.
Kenny DA, Veldhuijzen W, Weijden TV, et al. Interpersonal perception in the context of doctor-patient relationships: A dyadic analysis of doctor-patient communication. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70:763–8.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Braddock CH, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999;282:2313–20.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Street RL Jr, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74:295–301.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Carrillo JE, Green AR, Betancourt JR. Cross-cultural primary care: a patient-based approach. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:829–34.PubMed
53.
Wagner EH, Glasgow RE, Davis C, et al. Quality improvement in chronic illness care: a collaborative approach. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001;27:63–80.PubMed
54.
Ong LM, de Haes JC, Hoos AM, Lammes FB. Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40:903–18.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995;152:1423–33.PubMed
56.
Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE Jr. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989;27:S110–27.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Ward MM, Sundaramurthy S, Lotstein D, Bush TM, Neuwelt CM, Street RL Jr. Participatory patient-physician communication and morbidity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49:810–8.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Williams GC, McGregor HA, Zeldman A, Freedman ZR, Deci EL. Testing a self-determination theory process model for promoting glycemic control through diabetes self-management. Health Psychol. 2004;23:58–66.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Street RL, Gordon HS. Companion participation in cancer consultations. Psychooncology. 2008;17:244–51.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Siminoff LA, Graham GC, Gordon NH. Cancer communication patterns and the influence of patient characteristics: Disparities in information-giving and affective behaviors. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;62:355–60.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Gordon HS, Street RL Jr, Sharf BF, Kelly PA, Souchek J. Racial differences in trust and lung cancer patients' perceptions of physician communication. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:904–9.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Collins TC, Clark JA, Petersen LA, Kressin NR. Racial differences in how patients perceive physician communication regarding cardiac testing. Med Care. 2002;40:I27–34.PubMed
63.
Green AR, Carney DR, Pallin DJ, et al. Implicit bias among physicians and its prediction of thrombolysis decisions for black and white patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1231–8.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Teal CR, Street RL. Critical elements of culturally competent communication in the medical encounter: A review and model. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:533–43.CrossRefPubMed
65.
66.
Haidet P, Paterniti DA. "Building" a history rather than "taking" one: a perspective on information sharing during the medical interview. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1134–40.CrossRefPubMed
67.
Street RL Jr, Gordon HS. The clinical context and patient participation in post-diagnostic consultations. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64:217–24.CrossRefPubMed
68.
Street RL, Jr., Slee C, Kalauokalani DK, Dean DE, Tancredi DJ, Kravitz RL. Improving physician-patient communication about cancer pain with a tailored education-coaching intervention. Patient Educ Couns. 2009.
69.
Cegala DJ, Post DM, McClure L. The effects of patient communication skills training on the discourse of older patients during a primary care interview. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:1505–11.CrossRefPubMed
70.
Clayton JM, Butow PN, Tattersall MH, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a prompt list to help advanced cancer patients and their caregivers to ask questions about prognosis and end-of-life care. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:715–23.CrossRefPubMed
71.
Kim SP, Knight SJ, Tomori C, et al. Health literacy and shared decision making for prostate cancer patients with low socioeconomic status. Cancer Invest. 2001;19:684–91.CrossRefPubMed
72.
Street RL Jr, Voigt B, Geyer C Jr, Manning T, Swanson GP. Increasing patient involvement in choosing treatment for early breast cancer. Cancer. 1995;76:2275–85.CrossRefPubMed
73.
Anderson LA, DeVellis BM, DeVellis RF. Effects of modeling on patient communication, satisfaction, and knowledge. Med Care. 1987;25:1044–56.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Montgomery AA, Fahey T, Peters TJ. A factorial randomised controlled trial of decision analysis and an information video plus leaflet for newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. Br J Gen Pract. 2003;53:446–53.PubMed
75.
Weiner SJ. Contextualizing medical decisions to individualize care: lessons from the qualitative sciences. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:281–5.CrossRefPubMed
76.
Lang F, Floyd MR, Beine KL. Clues to patients' explanations and concerns about their illnesses. A call for active listening. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:222–7.CrossRefPubMed
77.
Levinson W, Gorawara-Bhat R, Lamb J. A study of patient clues and physician responses in primary care and surgical settings. JAMA. 2000;284:1021–7.CrossRefPubMed
78.
Weiner SJ, Schwartz A, Yudkowsky R, et al. Evaluating physician performance at individualizing care: a pilot study tracking contextual errors in medical decision making. Med Decis Making. 2007;27:726–34.CrossRefPubMed
79.
Thompson BM, Teal CR, Scott SM, Manning SN, Greenfield E, Shada R, Haidet P. Following the clues: Teaching medical students to explore patients' contexts. Patient Educ.Couns. 2010, in press.
Metadata
Title
How Well Do Doctors Know their Patients? Factors Affecting Physician Understanding of Patients’ Health Beliefs
Authors
Richard L. Street Jr, PhD
Paul Haidet, MD, MPH
Publication date
01-01-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1453-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2011 Go to the issue

Original Research

The Effect of Medication Samples on Self-Reported Prescribing Practices: A Statewide, Cross-Sectional Survey

Editorials

Primary Care and Primary Care Training: Mirror Images

Editorial

I Believe, Therefore I Do

Reviews

Efficacy and Safety of Tunneled Pleural Catheters in Adults with Malignant Pleural Effusions: A Systematic Review

Original Research

The Effect of Workload Reduction on the Quality of Residents’ Discharge Summaries

Original Research

Follow-up Actions on Electronic Referral Communication in a Multispecialty Outpatient Setting
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Reserve your place

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

Read more

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Pediatric Cardiology Video

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

Cardiopulmonary Comorbidity Video

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Valvular Heart Disease Video

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Heart Failure Video

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Heart Failure Video

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

Watch now

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

16-04-2024 Type 2 Diabetes News

Incentivised to exercise

11-04-2024 Lifestyle Modifications News

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

10-04-2024 Myocardial Infarction News

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Image Credits