Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2005

01-05-2005

How to Appraise a Diagnostic Test

Authors: Mohit Bhandari, M.D., M.Sc., Gordon H. Guyatt, M.D., M.Sc.

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 5/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Clinicians frequently confront challenges when using diagnostic tests to help them decide whether the patient before them suffers from a particular target condition or diagnosis. The primary issues to consider when determining the validity of a diagnostic test study are how the authors assembled the patients and whether they used an appropriate reference standard in all patients to determine whether the patients did or did not have the target condition. Surgeons should be interested in the characteristics of the test that indicates the direction and magnitude of change in the probability of the target condition associated with a particular test result. The likelihood ratio best captures the link between the pretest probability of the target condition and the probability after the test results are obtained (also called the posttest probability). Many studies, however, present the properties of diagnostic tests in less clinically useful terms: sensitivity and specificity. Sensitivity denotes the proportion of people with the disorder in whom the test result is positive. Specificity denotes the proportion of people without the disorder in whom the test result is negative. Application of the guides presented in this article can allow surgeons to assess critically studies regarding a diagnostic test.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jaeschke, R, Guyatt, GH, Sackett, DL. 1994User’s guide to the medical literature: how to use an article about a diagnostic test; are the results of the study valid?J.A.M.A.271389391PubMed Jaeschke, R, Guyatt, GH, Sackett, DL. 1994User’s guide to the medical literature: how to use an article about a diagnostic test; are the results of the study valid?J.A.M.A.271389391PubMed
2.
go back to reference Lijmer, JG, Mol, BW, Heisterkamp, S, et al. 1999Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic testsJ.A.M.A.28210611066PubMed Lijmer, JG, Mol, BW, Heisterkamp, S,  et al. 1999Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic testsJ.A.M.A.28210611066PubMed
3.
go back to reference Fletcher, R. 1986Carcinoembryonic antigenAnn. Intern. Med.1046673PubMed Fletcher, R. 1986Carcinoembryonic antigenAnn. Intern. Med.1046673PubMed
4.
go back to reference Thompson, DMP, Krupey, J, Freedman, SO, et al. 1969The radioimmunoassay of circulating carcinoembryonic antigen of the human digestive systemProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.64161167PubMed Thompson, DMP, Krupey, J, Freedman, SO,  et al. 1969The radioimmunoassay of circulating carcinoembryonic antigen of the human digestive systemProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.64161167PubMed
5.
go back to reference Prickett, W, Teefey, S, Galatz, L, et al. 2003Accuracy of ultrasound imaging of the rotator cuff in shoulders that are painful post-operativelyJ. Bone Joint Surg. Am.8510841089CrossRefPubMed Prickett, W, Teefey, S, Galatz, L,  et al. 2003Accuracy of ultrasound imaging of the rotator cuff in shoulders that are painful post-operativelyJ. Bone Joint Surg. Am.8510841089CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kawasaki, M, Hasegawa, Y, Sakano, S, et al. 2001Prediction of osteonecrosis by magnetic resonance imaging after femoral neck fracturesClin.Orthop.385157164PubMed Kawasaki, M, Hasegawa, Y, Sakano, S,  et al. 2001Prediction of osteonecrosis by magnetic resonance imaging after femoral neck fracturesClin.Orthop.385157164PubMed
7.
go back to reference Begg, CB, Greenes, RA. 1983Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection biasBiometrics39207215PubMed Begg, CB, Greenes, RA. 1983Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection biasBiometrics39207215PubMed
8.
go back to reference Gray, R, Begg, CB, Greenes, RA. 1984Construction of receiver operating characteristic curves when disease verification is subject to selection biasMed. Decis. Making4151164PubMed Gray, R, Begg, CB, Greenes, RA. 1984Construction of receiver operating characteristic curves when disease verification is subject to selection biasMed. Decis. Making4151164PubMed
9.
go back to reference Ransohoff, DF, Feinstein, AR. 1978Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic testsN. Engl. J. Med.299926930PubMed Ransohoff, DF, Feinstein, AR. 1978Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic testsN. Engl. J. Med.299926930PubMed
10.
go back to reference Choi, BC. 1992Sensitivity and specificity of a single diagnostic test in the presence of work-up biasJ. Clin. Epidemiol.45581586CrossRefPubMed Choi, BC. 1992Sensitivity and specificity of a single diagnostic test in the presence of work-up biasJ. Clin. Epidemiol.45581586CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hamming, JF, Goslings, BM, Steenis, GJ, et al. 1990The value of fine needle biopsy in patients with nodular thyroid disease divided into groups of suspicion of malignant neoplasms on clinical groundsArch. Intern. Med.150113116CrossRefPubMed Hamming, JF, Goslings, BM, Steenis, GJ,  et al. 1990The value of fine needle biopsy in patients with nodular thyroid disease divided into groups of suspicion of malignant neoplasms on clinical groundsArch. Intern. Med.150113116CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Fagan, TJ. 1975Nomogram for Bayes’s theoremN. Engl. J. Med.293257PubMed Fagan, TJ. 1975Nomogram for Bayes’s theoremN. Engl. J. Med.293257PubMed
13.
go back to reference Parvizi, J, Wayman, J, Kelly, P, et al. 1998Combining the clinical signs improves diagnosis of scaphoid fracturesJ. Hand Surg. [Br.]23324327 Parvizi, J, Wayman, J, Kelly, P,  et al. 1998Combining the clinical signs improves diagnosis of scaphoid fracturesJ. Hand Surg. [Br.]23324327
14.
go back to reference Hoffman, JR, Mower, WR, Wolf son, AB, et al. 2000Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma: National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study GroupN. Engl. J. Med.3439499CrossRefPubMed Hoffman, JR, Mower, WR, Wolf son, AB,  et al. 2000Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma: National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study GroupN. Engl. J. Med.3439499CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Teefey, SA, Hasan, SA, Middleton, WD, et al. 2000Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff: a comparison of ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings in one hundred consecutive seriesJ. Bone Joint Surg.82498504PubMed Teefey, SA, Hasan, SA, Middleton, WD,  et al. 2000Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff: a comparison of ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings in one hundred consecutive seriesJ. Bone Joint Surg.82498504PubMed
16.
go back to reference Rubinstein, RA,Jr, Shelbourne, KD, McCarroll, JR, et al. 1994The accuracy of the clinical examination in the setting of posterior cruciate ligament injuriesAm. J. Sports Med.22550557PubMed Rubinstein, RA,Jr, Shelbourne, KD, McCarroll, JR,  et al. 1994The accuracy of the clinical examination in the setting of posterior cruciate ligament injuriesAm. J. Sports Med.22550557PubMed
Metadata
Title
How to Appraise a Diagnostic Test
Authors
Mohit Bhandari, M.D., M.Sc.
Gordon H. Guyatt, M.D., M.Sc.
Publication date
01-05-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 5/2005
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7913-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2005

World Journal of Surgery 5/2005 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Invited Commentary