Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 1/2014

01-03-2014 | Original Research Article

Hostile Sexist Male Patients and Female Doctors: A Challenging Encounter

Authors: Christina Klöckner Cronauer, Marianne Schmid Mast

Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patient characteristics and attitudes can affect how patients react to the physician’s communication style, and this reaction can then influence consultation outcomes.

Objective

The goal of the present study was to investigate whether the attitude of a sexist male patient affects how he perceives a female physician’s nonverbal communication and whether this then results in expecting less positive consultation outcomes.

Study design and setting

Participants were analog patients who viewed four videotaped male and four videotaped female physicians in a consultation with one of their patients. Physician videos were preselected to represent a range of high and low patient-centered physician nonverbal behavior. Participants filled in questionnaires to assess how patient-centered they perceived the female and male physicians’ nonverbal communication to be, and participants indicated how positive they expected the consultation outcomes to be. Moreover, we assessed the participants’ sexist attitudes with a questionnaire measuring hostile and benevolent sexism.

Participants

Students (N = 60) from a French-speaking university in Switzerland were recruited on campus.

Main outcome measure

The main outcome measures were the extent to which analog patients expect the consultation outcomes to be positive (high satisfaction, increased trust in the physician, intention to adhere to treatment recommendations, and perceived physician competence) and the extent to which analog patients perceive physicians as patient-centered (judged from the physicians’ nonverbal cues).

Results

Male analog patients’ hostile sexism was negatively related to perceiving the physicians as patient-centered, and male analog patients’ hostile sexism was also negatively related to expected positive consultation outcomes. For male patients viewing female physicians, mediation analysis revealed that perceived physician patient-centeredness mediated the negative relationship between hostile sexism and expected positive consultation outcomes.

Conclusion

Male hostile sexist patients perceive a female physician’s nonverbal communication as less patient-centered and this negatively affects their expectation of positive outcomes from the consultation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Beck RS, Daughtridge R, Sloane PD. Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002;15(1):25–38.PubMed Beck RS, Daughtridge R, Sloane PD. Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002;15(1):25–38.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Roter DL, Frankel RM, Hall JA, Sluyter D. The expression of emotion through nonverbal behavior in medical visits. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:28–34.CrossRef Roter DL, Frankel RM, Hall JA, Sluyter D. The expression of emotion through nonverbal behavior in medical visits. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:28–34.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;152:1423–33. Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;152:1423–33.
4.
go back to reference Schmid Mast M, Hall JA, Roter DL. Disentangling physician gender and communication style effects on patient satisfaction and behavior in a virtual medical visit. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;3:1–28. Schmid Mast M, Hall JA, Roter DL. Disentangling physician gender and communication style effects on patient satisfaction and behavior in a virtual medical visit. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;3:1–28.
5.
go back to reference Stewart MA, Brown J, Donner A, McWhinney I, Oates J, Weston W, et al. The impact of patient-centered care on patient outcomes. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:796–804.PubMed Stewart MA, Brown J, Donner A, McWhinney I, Oates J, Weston W, et al. The impact of patient-centered care on patient outcomes. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:796–804.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Bensing JM, Kerssens JJ, van der Pasch M. Patient directed gaze as a tool for discovering and handling psychosocial problems in general practice. J Nonverbal Behav. 1995;19(4):223–42.CrossRef Bensing JM, Kerssens JJ, van der Pasch M. Patient directed gaze as a tool for discovering and handling psychosocial problems in general practice. J Nonverbal Behav. 1995;19(4):223–42.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Epstein RM. The science of patient-centered care. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:805–7.PubMed Epstein RM. The science of patient-centered care. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:805–7.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Bensing JM. Doctor–patient communication and the quality of care. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32:1301–10.PubMedCrossRef Bensing JM. Doctor–patient communication and the quality of care. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32:1301–10.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference DiMatteo MR, Hays RD, Prince LM. Relationship of physicians’ nonverbal communication skills and standardized patient satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;18:170–4. DiMatteo MR, Hays RD, Prince LM. Relationship of physicians’ nonverbal communication skills and standardized patient satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;18:170–4.
10.
go back to reference Aruguete MS, Roberts CA. Gender, affiliation, and control in physician–patient encounters. Sex Roles. 2000;42:107–18.CrossRef Aruguete MS, Roberts CA. Gender, affiliation, and control in physician–patient encounters. Sex Roles. 2000;42:107–18.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Robinson JD. Nonverbal communication and physician–patient interaction. In: Manusov V, Patterson ML, editors. The sage handbook of nonverbal communication. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2006. p. 437–59.CrossRef Robinson JD. Nonverbal communication and physician–patient interaction. In: Manusov V, Patterson ML, editors. The sage handbook of nonverbal communication. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2006. p. 437–59.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Benbassat J, Pilpel D, Tidhar M. Patients’ preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys. Behav Med. 1998;24:81–8.PubMedCrossRef Benbassat J, Pilpel D, Tidhar M. Patients’ preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys. Behav Med. 1998;24:81–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz MA. Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Intern Med. 1989;4:23–30. Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz MA. Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Intern Med. 1989;4:23–30.
15.
go back to reference Braman AC, Gomez RG. Patient personality predicts preferences for relationships with doctors. Pers Individ Differ. 2004;37:815–26.CrossRef Braman AC, Gomez RG. Patient personality predicts preferences for relationships with doctors. Pers Individ Differ. 2004;37:815–26.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hall JA, Roter DL. Do patients talk differently to male and female physicians? A meta-analytic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48:217–24.PubMedCrossRef Hall JA, Roter DL. Do patients talk differently to male and female physicians? A meta-analytic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48:217–24.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Roter DL, Hall JA, Aoki Y. Physician gender effects in medical communication. JAMA. 2002;288:756–64.PubMedCrossRef Roter DL, Hall JA, Aoki Y. Physician gender effects in medical communication. JAMA. 2002;288:756–64.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sandhu H, Adams A, Singleton L, Clark-Carter D, Kidd J. The impact of gender dyads on doctor–patient communication: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;76:348–55.PubMedCrossRef Sandhu H, Adams A, Singleton L, Clark-Carter D, Kidd J. The impact of gender dyads on doctor–patient communication: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;76:348–55.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hall JA, Irish JT, Roter DL, Ehrlich CM, Miller LH. Gender in medical encounters: an analysis of physician and patient communication in a primary care setting. Health Psychol. 1994;13:384–92.PubMedCrossRef Hall JA, Irish JT, Roter DL, Ehrlich CM, Miller LH. Gender in medical encounters: an analysis of physician and patient communication in a primary care setting. Health Psychol. 1994;13:384–92.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cousin G, Schmid Mast M, Jaunin-Stalder N. When physician expressed uncertainty leads to patient dissatisfaction: a gender study. Med Educ. 2013;47(9):923-31. Cousin G, Schmid Mast M, Jaunin-Stalder N. When physician expressed uncertainty leads to patient dissatisfaction: a gender study. Med Educ. 2013;47(9):923-31.
22.
go back to reference Roter DL, Hall JA. Doctors talking with patients/patients talking with doctors: improving communication in medical visits. Westport: Auburn House/Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc; 1992. Roter DL, Hall JA. Doctors talking with patients/patients talking with doctors: improving communication in medical visits. Westport: Auburn House/Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc; 1992.
24.
go back to reference Blanch-Hartigan DC, Hall JA, Roter DL, Frankel RM. Gender bias in patients’ perceptions of patient-centered behaviors. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;80(3):315–20.PubMedCrossRef Blanch-Hartigan DC, Hall JA, Roter DL, Frankel RM. Gender bias in patients’ perceptions of patient-centered behaviors. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;80(3):315–20.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Schmid Mast M. On the importance of nonverbal communication in the physician–patient interaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67:315–8. Schmid Mast M. On the importance of nonverbal communication in the physician–patient interaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67:315–8.
26.
go back to reference Ambady N, Koo J, Rosenthal R, Winograd CH. Physical therapists’ nonverbal communication predicts geriatric patients’ health outcomes. Psychol Aging. 2002;17:443–52.PubMedCrossRef Ambady N, Koo J, Rosenthal R, Winograd CH. Physical therapists’ nonverbal communication predicts geriatric patients’ health outcomes. Psychol Aging. 2002;17:443–52.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ambady N, LaPlante D, Nguyen T, Rosenthal R, Chaumeton N, Levinson W. Surgeons’ tone of voice: a clue to malpractice history. Surgery. 2002;132:5–9.PubMedCrossRef Ambady N, LaPlante D, Nguyen T, Rosenthal R, Chaumeton N, Levinson W. Surgeons’ tone of voice: a clue to malpractice history. Surgery. 2002;132:5–9.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hall JA, Harrigan JA, Rosenthal R. Nonverbal behavior in clinician–patient interaction. Appl Prev Psychol. 1995;4:21–37.CrossRef Hall JA, Harrigan JA, Rosenthal R. Nonverbal behavior in clinician–patient interaction. Appl Prev Psychol. 1995;4:21–37.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Glick P, Fiske ST. The ambivalent sexism inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70:491–512.CrossRef Glick P, Fiske ST. The ambivalent sexism inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70:491–512.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Foss C, Sundby J. The construction of the gendered patient: hospital staff’s attitudes to female and male patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;49(1):45–52.PubMedCrossRef Foss C, Sundby J. The construction of the gendered patient: hospital staff’s attitudes to female and male patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;49(1):45–52.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Schmid Mast M, Kindlimann A, Langewitz W. Recipient’s perspective on breaking bad news: how you put it really make a difference. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;58:244–51. Schmid Mast M, Kindlimann A, Langewitz W. Recipient’s perspective on breaking bad news: how you put it really make a difference. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;58:244–51.
34.
go back to reference Schmid Mast M, Hall JA, Klöckner C, Choi E. Physician gender affects how physician nonverbal behavior is related to patient satisfaction. Med Care. 2008;46:1212–8. Schmid Mast M, Hall JA, Klöckner C, Choi E. Physician gender affects how physician nonverbal behavior is related to patient satisfaction. Med Care. 2008;46:1212–8.
35.
go back to reference Krupat E, Frankel RM, Stein T, Irish JT. The four habits coding scheme: validation of an instrument to assess clinicians’ communication behavior. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;62:38–45.PubMedCrossRef Krupat E, Frankel RM, Stein T, Irish JT. The four habits coding scheme: validation of an instrument to assess clinicians’ communication behavior. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;62:38–45.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Roter DL, Hall JA, Katz NR. Relations between physicians’ behaviors and analogue patients’ satisfaction, recall, and impressions. Med Care. 1987;25:437–49.PubMedCrossRef Roter DL, Hall JA, Katz NR. Relations between physicians’ behaviors and analogue patients’ satisfaction, recall, and impressions. Med Care. 1987;25:437–49.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Shapiro DE, Boggs SR, Melamed BG, Graham-Pole J. The effect of varied physician affect on recall, anxiety, and perceptions in women at risk for breast cancer: a simulated study. Health Psychol. 1992;11:61–6.PubMedCrossRef Shapiro DE, Boggs SR, Melamed BG, Graham-Pole J. The effect of varied physician affect on recall, anxiety, and perceptions in women at risk for breast cancer: a simulated study. Health Psychol. 1992;11:61–6.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Fogarty LA, Curbow BA, Wingard JR, McDonnell K, Somerfield MR. Can 40 seconds of compassion reduce patient anxiety? J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:371–9.PubMed Fogarty LA, Curbow BA, Wingard JR, McDonnell K, Somerfield MR. Can 40 seconds of compassion reduce patient anxiety? J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:371–9.PubMed
39.
go back to reference Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centered consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48:51–61.PubMedCrossRef Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centered consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48:51–61.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Meng XL, Rosenthal R, Rubin DB. Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychol Bull. 1992;111:172–5.CrossRef Meng XL, Rosenthal R, Rubin DB. Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychol Bull. 1992;111:172–5.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51:1173–82.PubMedCrossRef Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51:1173–82.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Glick P, Fiske ST. The ambivalent sexism inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70(3):491–512.CrossRef Glick P, Fiske ST. The ambivalent sexism inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70(3):491–512.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Napier J, Thorisdottir H, Jost J. The joy of sexism? A multinational investigation of hostile and benevolent justifications for gender inequality and their relations to subjective well-being. Sex Roles. 2010;62(7):405–19. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9712-7.CrossRef Napier J, Thorisdottir H, Jost J. The joy of sexism? A multinational investigation of hostile and benevolent justifications for gender inequality and their relations to subjective well-being. Sex Roles. 2010;62(7):405–19. doi:10.​1007/​s11199-009-9712-7.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Jackson JL, Kroenke K. Difficult patient encounters in the ambulatory clinic: clinical predictors and outcomes. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(10):1069–75. doi:10-1001/pubs.ArchInternMed. ISSN-0003-9926-159-10-ioi80572. Jackson JL, Kroenke K. Difficult patient encounters in the ambulatory clinic: clinical predictors and outcomes. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(10):1069–75. doi:10-1001/​pubs.​ArchInternMed. ISSN-0003-9926-159-10-ioi80572.
45.
go back to reference Delgado A, Lopez-Fernandez LA, Luna Jde D, Saletti-Cuesta L, Gil N, Jimenez M. The role of expectations in preferences of patients for a female or male general practitioner. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;82(1):49–57. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.02.028. Delgado A, Lopez-Fernandez LA, Luna Jde D, Saletti-Cuesta L, Gil N, Jimenez M. The role of expectations in preferences of patients for a female or male general practitioner. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;82(1):49–57. doi:10.​1016/​j.​pec.​2010.​02.​028.
46.
go back to reference Richeson JA, Shelton JN. Brief report: thin slices of racial bias. J Nonverbal Behav. 2005;29:75–86.CrossRef Richeson JA, Shelton JN. Brief report: thin slices of racial bias. J Nonverbal Behav. 2005;29:75–86.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Rosenthal GE, Sahnnon SE. The use of patient perceptions in the evaluation of health-care delivery systems. Med Care. 1997;35(11):NS58–68. Rosenthal GE, Sahnnon SE. The use of patient perceptions in the evaluation of health-care delivery systems. Med Care. 1997;35(11):NS58–68.
Metadata
Title
Hostile Sexist Male Patients and Female Doctors: A Challenging Encounter
Authors
Christina Klöckner Cronauer
Marianne Schmid Mast
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Electronic ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-013-0025-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 1/2014 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.