Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2012

01-05-2012 | Epidemiology

Higher expression of androgen receptor is a significant predictor for better endocrine-responsiveness in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers

Authors: Seho Park, Hyung Seok Park, Ja Seung Koo, Woo Ick Yang, Seung Il Kim, Byeong-Woo Park

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim was to investigate the implications of androgen receptor (AR) expression levels on outcomes for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors. Immunohistochemically AR levels were determined from tissue microarrays of 614 ER-positive patients who received adjuvant endocrine with or without chemotherapy between November 1999 and August 2005. Characteristics and survival were analyzed using a Chi-square test, Kaplan–Meier methods, and Cox’s models. AR levels were categorized into 3 subgroups as follows: low, AR < 10%; intermediate, 10% ≤ AR < 50%; high, AR ≥ 50%. Low, intermediate, and high AR levels were observed in 29.0, 44.0, and 27.0% of patients, respectively. High AR was associated with smaller size, nodal uninvolvement, grade I/II tumor, higher progesterone receptor expression, and lower proliferation index. With a median follow-up of 70.9 months, the high AR subgroup showed better survival, and these associations were maintained in 119 patients who received endocrine therapy alone [hazard ratio (HR), 0.111; 95% CI, 0.013–0.961 for disease-free survival (DFS); HR, 0.135; 95% CI, 0.015–1.208 for overall survival (OS)]. No significant benefits from chemotherapy were demonstrated in the high AR subgroup; however, the benefit from chemotherapy was significant among 448 AR-intermediate or -low patients (HR, 2.679; 95% CI, 1.452–4.944 for DFS; HR, 3.371; 95% CI, 1.611–7.052 for OS). High AR is an independent prognostic factor and a significant predictor for better endocrine-responsiveness in ER-positive tumors. AR-low or -intermediate levels could give an additional indication for use of chemotherapy in ER-positive tumors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365:1687–1717. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66544-0 CrossRef Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365:1687–1717. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(05)66544-0 CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ma CX, Sanchez CG, Ellis MJ (2009) Predicting endocrine therapy responsiveness in breast cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 23:133–142 Ma CX, Sanchez CG, Ellis MJ (2009) Predicting endocrine therapy responsiveness in breast cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 23:133–142
4.
go back to reference Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK et al (1999) Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:1474–1481PubMed Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK et al (1999) Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:1474–1481PubMed
10.
go back to reference Colleoni M, Bagnardi V, Rotmensz N et al (2009) Increasing steroid hormone receptors expression defines breast cancer subtypes non responsive to preoperative chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 116:359–369. doi:10.1007/s10549-008-0223-y PubMedCrossRef Colleoni M, Bagnardi V, Rotmensz N et al (2009) Increasing steroid hormone receptors expression defines breast cancer subtypes non responsive to preoperative chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 116:359–369. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-008-0223-y PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Carlson RW, Allred DC, Anderson BO et al (2009) Breast cancer. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 7:122–192 Carlson RW, Allred DC, Anderson BO et al (2009) Breast cancer. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 7:122–192
12.
go back to reference Goldhirsch A, Ingle JN, Gelber RD et al (2009) Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2009. Ann Oncol 20:1319–1329. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdp322 PubMedCrossRef Goldhirsch A, Ingle JN, Gelber RD et al (2009) Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2009. Ann Oncol 20:1319–1329. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdp322 PubMedCrossRef
13.
14.
15.
18.
go back to reference Ingle JN, Twito DI, Schaid DJ et al (1991) Combination hormonal therapy with tamoxifen plus fluoxymesterone versus tamoxifen alone in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. An updated analysis. Cancer 67:886–891PubMedCrossRef Ingle JN, Twito DI, Schaid DJ et al (1991) Combination hormonal therapy with tamoxifen plus fluoxymesterone versus tamoxifen alone in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. An updated analysis. Cancer 67:886–891PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(07)61602-X CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID et al (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, New York Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID et al (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, New York
23.
go back to reference Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19:403–410PubMedCrossRef Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19:403–410PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M et al (2010) American society of clinical oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:2784–2795. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.25.6529 PubMedCrossRef Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M et al (2010) American society of clinical oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:2784–2795. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2009.​25.​6529 PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN et al (2007) American society of clinical oncology/College of American pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:118–145. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2775 PubMedCrossRef Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN et al (2007) American society of clinical oncology/College of American pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:118–145. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2006.​09.​2775 PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Rastelli F, Crispino S (2008) Factors predictive of response to hormone therapy in breast cancer. Tumori 94:370–383PubMed Rastelli F, Crispino S (2008) Factors predictive of response to hormone therapy in breast cancer. Tumori 94:370–383PubMed
30.
go back to reference Loibl S, Muller BM, von Minckwitz G et al (2011) Androgen receptor expression in primary breast cancer and its predictive and prognostic value in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 130:477–487. doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1715-8 PubMedCrossRef Loibl S, Muller BM, von Minckwitz G et al (2011) Androgen receptor expression in primary breast cancer and its predictive and prognostic value in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 130:477–487. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-011-1715-8 PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ravdin PM, Siminoff LA, Davis GJ et al (2001) Computer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:980–991PubMed Ravdin PM, Siminoff LA, Davis GJ et al (2001) Computer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:980–991PubMed
32.
33.
Metadata
Title
Higher expression of androgen receptor is a significant predictor for better endocrine-responsiveness in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers
Authors
Seho Park
Hyung Seok Park
Ja Seung Koo
Woo Ick Yang
Seung Il Kim
Byeong-Woo Park
Publication date
01-05-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1950-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine