Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Hepatocellular Carcinoma | Research article

Effect of prior cancer on survival of hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for clinical trial eligibility criteria

Authors: Xuqi Sun, Lingling Li, Li Xu, Zhongguo Zhou, Jinbin Chen, Juncheng Wang, Yaojun Zhang, Dandan Hu, Minshan Chen

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patients with cancer history are usually excluded from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) clinical trials. However, whether previous malignancy affects the oncological outcomes of HCC patients has not been fully assessed. This study aimed to evaluate whether prior cancer compromised the survival of HCC patients.

Methods

Patients with HCC were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2004 and 2015, and then they were classified into groups with and without prior cancer. The Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analysis were adopted to evaluate whether prior cancer impacted clinical outcomes after propensity score matching (PSM) adjusting baseline differences. Validation was performed in the cohort from our institution.

Results

We identified 2642 HCC patients with prior cancer. After PSM, the median overall survival (OS) time were 14.5 and 12.0 months respectively for groups with and without prior cancer. Prior cancer did not compromise prognosis in patients with HCC (p = 0.49). The same tendency was found in subgroups stratified by tumor stages and cancer interval period: OS was similar between groups with and without prior cancer (both p values> 0.1). In the multivariate Cox regression model, prior cancer did not adversely impact patients’ survival (HR: 1.024; 95% CI: 0.961–1.092). In the validation cohort from our institution, prior cancer had no significant association with worse outcomes (p = 0.48).

Conclusion

For HCC patients, prior cancer did not compromise their survival, regardless of tumor stage and cancer interval period. Exclusion criteria for HCC clinical trials could be reconsidered.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.CrossRef Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Vogel A, Cervantes A, Chau I, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(5):871–3.CrossRef Vogel A, Cervantes A, Chau I, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(5):871–3.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Li D, Sedano S, Allen R, et al. Current treatment landscape for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: patient outcomes and the impact on quality of life. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(6). Li D, Sedano S, Allen R, et al. Current treatment landscape for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: patient outcomes and the impact on quality of life. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(6).
4.
go back to reference Xie F, Feng S, Sun L, et al. The first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients: lenvatinib versus sorafenib, or beyond? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2018;7(3):221–4.CrossRef Xie F, Feng S, Sun L, et al. The first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients: lenvatinib versus sorafenib, or beyond? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2018;7(3):221–4.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Howerton MW, Gibbons MC, Baffi CR, et al. Provider roles in the recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials. Cancer. 2007;109(3):465–76.CrossRef Howerton MW, Gibbons MC, Baffi CR, et al. Provider roles in the recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials. Cancer. 2007;109(3):465–76.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lara PN Jr, Higdon R, Lim N, et al. Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(6):1728–33.CrossRef Lara PN Jr, Higdon R, Lim N, et al. Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(6):1728–33.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Simon MS, Du W, Flaherty L, et al. Factors associated with breast cancer clinical trials participation and enrollment at a large academic medical center. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(11):2046–52.CrossRef Simon MS, Du W, Flaherty L, et al. Factors associated with breast cancer clinical trials participation and enrollment at a large academic medical center. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(11):2046–52.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Zhou H, Huang Y, Qiu Z, et al. Impact of prior cancer history on the overall survival of patients newly diagnosed with cancer: a pan-cancer analysis of the SEER database. Int J Cancer. 2018;143(7):1569–77.CrossRef Zhou H, Huang Y, Qiu Z, et al. Impact of prior cancer history on the overall survival of patients newly diagnosed with cancer: a pan-cancer analysis of the SEER database. Int J Cancer. 2018;143(7):1569–77.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference de Moor JS, Mariotto AB, Parry C, et al. Cancer survivors in the United States: prevalence across the survivorship trajectory and implications for care. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2013;22(4):561–70.CrossRef de Moor JS, Mariotto AB, Parry C, et al. Cancer survivors in the United States: prevalence across the survivorship trajectory and implications for care. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2013;22(4):561–70.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Xie Y, Liu X, Ma X, et al. Small titanium-based MOFs prepared with the introduction of tetraethyl orthosilicate and their potential for use in drug delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(16):13325–32.CrossRef Xie Y, Liu X, Ma X, et al. Small titanium-based MOFs prepared with the introduction of tetraethyl orthosilicate and their potential for use in drug delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(16):13325–32.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424.CrossRef Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pruitt SL, Laccetti AL, Xuan L, et al. Revisiting a longstanding clinical trial exclusion criterion: impact of prior cancer in early-stage lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2017;116(6):717–25.CrossRef Pruitt SL, Laccetti AL, Xuan L, et al. Revisiting a longstanding clinical trial exclusion criterion: impact of prior cancer in early-stage lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2017;116(6):717–25.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Johnson PJ, Qin S, Park JW, et al. Brivanib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy in patients with unresectable, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results from the randomized phase III BRISK-FL study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(28):3517–24.CrossRef Johnson PJ, Qin S, Park JW, et al. Brivanib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy in patients with unresectable, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results from the randomized phase III BRISK-FL study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(28):3517–24.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ahn DH, Mehta N, Yorio JT, et al. Influence of medical comorbidities on the presentation and outcomes of stage I-III non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2013;14(6):644–50.CrossRef Ahn DH, Mehta N, Yorio JT, et al. Influence of medical comorbidities on the presentation and outcomes of stage I-III non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2013;14(6):644–50.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wang YQ, Lv JW, Tang LL, et al. Effect of prior cancer on trial eligibility and treatment outcomes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: implications for clinical trial accrual. Oral Oncol. 2019;90:23–9.CrossRef Wang YQ, Lv JW, Tang LL, et al. Effect of prior cancer on trial eligibility and treatment outcomes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: implications for clinical trial accrual. Oral Oncol. 2019;90:23–9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sankila R, Hakulinen T. Survival of patients with colorectal carcinoma: effect of prior breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90(1):63–5.CrossRef Sankila R, Hakulinen T. Survival of patients with colorectal carcinoma: effect of prior breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90(1):63–5.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Laccetti AL, Pruitt SL, Xuan L, et al. Prior cancer does not adversely affect survival in locally advanced lung cancer: a national SEER-medicare analysis. Lung Cancer. 2016;98:106–13.CrossRef Laccetti AL, Pruitt SL, Xuan L, et al. Prior cancer does not adversely affect survival in locally advanced lung cancer: a national SEER-medicare analysis. Lung Cancer. 2016;98:106–13.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of prior cancer on survival of hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for clinical trial eligibility criteria
Authors
Xuqi Sun
Lingling Li
Li Xu
Zhongguo Zhou
Jinbin Chen
Juncheng Wang
Yaojun Zhang
Dandan Hu
Minshan Chen
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-07870-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Cancer 1/2021 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine