Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 7/2022

12-03-2022 | Hemangioma | Original Article

Radiotherapy for vertebral hemangioma: the single-center experience of 80 patients

Authors: Rahmi Atil Aksoy, Melek Gamze Aksu, Aylin Fidan Korcum, Mine Genc

Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Issue 7/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy and to determine possible prognostic factors in patients with painful vertebral hemangioma.

Methods

In the last two decades, 80 patients with vertebral hemangioma who received radiotherapy in our institute were evaluated in terms of pain response, treatment-related side effects, and prognostic factors. All patients were questioned 3 months after radiotherapy for the evaluation of pain response and were divided into three groups (complete response, partial response, and no change). Moreover, the visual analog scale (VAS) was used for pain response assessment in 46 patients. Pain status was assessed to detect recurrence at each clinical examination during the follow-up period. Possible prognostic factors such as gender, size of the hemangioma, location, multilevel involvement and additional musculoskeletal disease on pain response were analyzed.

Results

In this study, 45 individuals had lesions in the lumbar spine, 28 in the thoracic, and 7 in the cervical region. Furthermore, 51 patients had additional musculoskeletal conditions such as disc herniation, degenerative diseases, spondylolisthesis, and compression fracture. Radiotherapy was performed with a median daily dose of 2 Gy and a median total dose of 40 Gy. Complete pain response occurred in 58.8% of patients, 26.2% of patients had partial pain response, and 15% of patients had no pain response. The overall response rate was 85%, and 7 patients showed recurrent pain symptoms in the overall response group at routine follow-up. Additional musculoskeletal disorders were found to be the only prognostic factor associated with pain response. The median follow-up time was 60 months. Secondary malignancy was not found in any of the patients in this short follow-up time. No acute or late radiation-associated side effects greater than grade II were observed.

Conclusion

To our best knowledge, this study is one of the largest single-institution radiotherapy series on vertebral hemangiomas reported to date. The obtained data support the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy in the treatment of painful vertebral hemangioma. Our study showed that additional musculoskeletal disease plays an important role in pain response. Other prognostic factors and treatment of vertebral hemangioma with stereotactic radiosurgery should be investigated in future studies.
Literature
17.
go back to reference Miszczyk L, Ficek K, Trela K, Spindel J (2001) The efficacy of radiotherapy for vertebral hemangiomas. Neoplasma 48(1):82–84PubMed Miszczyk L, Ficek K, Trela K, Spindel J (2001) The efficacy of radiotherapy for vertebral hemangiomas. Neoplasma 48(1):82–84PubMed
19.
go back to reference Heyd R, Seegenschmiedt MH, Rades D, Winkler C, Eich HT, Bruns F, Gosheger G, Willich N, Micke O, German Cooperative Group on Radiotherapy for Benign Diseases (2010) Radiotherapy for symptomatic vertebral hemangiomas: results of a multicenter study and literature review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77(1):217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.055CrossRefPubMed Heyd R, Seegenschmiedt MH, Rades D, Winkler C, Eich HT, Bruns F, Gosheger G, Willich N, Micke O, German Cooperative Group on Radiotherapy for Benign Diseases (2010) Radiotherapy for symptomatic vertebral hemangiomas: results of a multicenter study and literature review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77(1):217–225. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ijrobp.​2009.​04.​055CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ (2012) Radiobiology for the radiologist, 7th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ (2012) Radiobiology for the radiologist, 7th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
22.
go back to reference Beyzadeoglu M, Dirican B, Oysul K, Surenkok S, Pak Y (2002) Evaluation of radiation carcinogenesis risk in vertebral hemangioma treated by radiotherapy. Neoplasma 49:338–341PubMed Beyzadeoglu M, Dirican B, Oysul K, Surenkok S, Pak Y (2002) Evaluation of radiation carcinogenesis risk in vertebral hemangioma treated by radiotherapy. Neoplasma 49:338–341PubMed
23.
go back to reference Yu NY, Sio TT, Lyons MK, Vora SA, Turkmani A, Brown PD, Park SS, Leenstra JL, Bendok BR, Schild SE, Ashman JB (2020) Linear accelerator-based single-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy for symptomatic vertebral body hemangiomas: The Mayo Clinic experience. J Clin Neurosci 80:74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2020.07.060CrossRefPubMed Yu NY, Sio TT, Lyons MK, Vora SA, Turkmani A, Brown PD, Park SS, Leenstra JL, Bendok BR, Schild SE, Ashman JB (2020) Linear accelerator-based single-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy for symptomatic vertebral body hemangiomas: The Mayo Clinic experience. J Clin Neurosci 80:74–78. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jocn.​2020.​07.​060CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Radiotherapy for vertebral hemangioma: the single-center experience of 80 patients
Authors
Rahmi Atil Aksoy
Melek Gamze Aksu
Aylin Fidan Korcum
Mine Genc
Publication date
12-03-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Issue 7/2022
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Electronic ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-022-01915-4

Other articles of this Issue 7/2022

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 7/2022 Go to the issue