Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 1/2023

01-02-2023 | Heart Surgery | Original Research

Real-world outcomes of the hypotension prediction index in the management of intraoperative hypotension during non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective clinical study

Authors: Gumersindo Javier Solares, Daniel Garcia, Manuel Ignacio Monge Garcia, Carlos Crespo, Jose Luis Rabago, Francisco Iglesias, Eduardo Larraz, Idoia Zubizarreta, Jose Manuel Rabanal

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

The Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) is a validated algorithm developed by applying machine learning for predicting intraoperative arterial hypotension (IOH). We evaluated whether the HPI, combined with a personalized treatment protocol, helps to reduce IOH (depth and duration) and perioperative events in real practice. This was a single-center retrospective study including 104 consecutive adults undergoing urgent or elective non-cardiac surgery with moderate-to-high risk of bleeding, requiring invasive blood pressure and continuous cardiac output monitoring. Depending on the sensor, two comparable groups were identified: patients managed following the institutional protocol of personalized goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT, n = 52), or this GDFT supported by the HPI (HPI, n = 52). The time-weighted average of hypotension for a mean arterial pressure < 65 mmHg (TWAMAP<65), postoperative complications and length of hospital stay (LOS) were automatically downloaded from medical records and revised by clinicians blinded to the management received by patients. Differences in preoperative variables (i.e. physical status -ASA class-, acute kidney Injury-AKI- risk) and outcomes were analyzed using non-parametric tests with Hodges-Lehmann estimator for the median of differences. ASA class and AKI risk were similar (p = 0.749 and p = 0.837, respectively). Blood loss was also comparable (p = 0.279). HPI patients had a lower TWAMAP<65 [0.09 mmHg (0–0.48 mmHg)] vs [0.23 mmHg (0.01 to 0.97 mmHg)], p = 0.037. Postoperative complications were less prevalent in the HPI patients (0.46 ± 0.98 vs. 0.88 ± 1.20), p = 0.035. Finally, LOS was significantly shorter among HPI patients with a median difference of 2 days (p = 0.019). The HPI combined with a GDFT protocol may help to minimize the severity of IOH during non-cardiac surgery.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
10.
go back to reference Schneck E, Schulte D, Habig L, et al. Hypotension Prediction Index based protocolized haemodynamic management reduces the incidence and duration of intraoperative hypotension in primary total hip arthroplasty: a single centre feasibility randomised blinded prospective interventional trial. J Clin Monit Comput. 2020;34(6):1149–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00433-6.CrossRef Schneck E, Schulte D, Habig L, et al. Hypotension Prediction Index based protocolized haemodynamic management reduces the incidence and duration of intraoperative hypotension in primary total hip arthroplasty: a single centre feasibility randomised blinded prospective interventional trial. J Clin Monit Comput. 2020;34(6):1149–58. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10877-019-00433-6.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wijnberge M, Geerts BF, Hol L, et al. Effect of a machine learning-derived early warning system for intraoperative hypotension vs standard care on depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension during elective noncardiac surgery: the HYPE randomized clinical trial. JAMA—J Am Med Assoc. 2020;323(11):1052–60. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.0592.CrossRef Wijnberge M, Geerts BF, Hol L, et al. Effect of a machine learning-derived early warning system for intraoperative hypotension vs standard care on depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension during elective noncardiac surgery: the HYPE randomized clinical trial. JAMA—J Am Med Assoc. 2020;323(11):1052–60. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​jama.​2020.​0592.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Grundmann CD, Wischermann JM, Fassbender P, Bischoff P, Frey UH. Hemodynamic monitoring with Hypotension Prediction Index versus arterial waveform analysis alone and incidence of perioperative hypotension. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021;65(10):1404–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/AAS.13964.CrossRef Grundmann CD, Wischermann JM, Fassbender P, Bischoff P, Frey UH. Hemodynamic monitoring with Hypotension Prediction Index versus arterial waveform analysis alone and incidence of perioperative hypotension. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021;65(10):1404–12. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​AAS.​13964.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Smith JJ, Kampine JP Circulatory response to non exercise stress. In: Satterfield TS (ed). Circulatory Physiology: the essentials, 3rd edn, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore; 1990. p 252–273. Smith JJ, Kampine JP  Circulatory response to non exercise stress. In: Satterfield TS (ed). Circulatory Physiology: the essentials, 3rd edn, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore; 1990. p 252–273.
19.
go back to reference Futier E, Lefrant JY, Guinot PG, et al. Effect of individualized vs standard blood pressure management strategies on postoperative organ dysfunction among high-risk patients undergoing major surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA—J Am Med Assoc. 2017;318(14):1346–57. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.14172.CrossRef Futier E, Lefrant JY, Guinot PG, et al. Effect of individualized vs standard blood pressure management strategies on postoperative organ dysfunction among high-risk patients undergoing major surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA—J Am Med Assoc. 2017;318(14):1346–57. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​jama.​2017.​14172.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Real-world outcomes of the hypotension prediction index in the management of intraoperative hypotension during non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective clinical study
Authors
Gumersindo Javier Solares
Daniel Garcia
Manuel Ignacio Monge Garcia
Carlos Crespo
Jose Luis Rabago
Francisco Iglesias
Eduardo Larraz
Idoia Zubizarreta
Jose Manuel Rabanal
Publication date
01-02-2023
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00881-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 1/2023 Go to the issue