Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Heart Surgery | Research article

Incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive versus median sternotomy valve surgery: propensity score matching

Authors: Mohamed Abdulkadir Mohamed, Cai Cheng, Xiang Wei

Published in: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are common incidents associated with an increased hospital stay, readmissions into the intensive care unit (ICU), increased costs, and mortality after cardiac surgery. Our study aims to analyze whether minimally invasive valve surgery (MIVS) can reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications compared to the full median sternotomy (FS) approach.

Methods

We reviewed the records of 1076 patients who underwent isolated mitral or aortic valve surgery (80 MIVS and 996 FS) in our institution between January 2015 and December 2019. Propensity score-matching analysis was used to compare outcomes between the groups and to reduce selection bias.

Results

Propensity score matching revealed no significant difference in hospital mortality between the groups. The incidence of PPCs was significantly less in the MIVS group than in the FS group (19% vs. 69%, respectively; P < 0.0001). The most common PPCs were atelectasis (P = 0.034), pleural effusions (P = 0.042), and pulmonary infection (P = 0.001). Prolonged mechanical ventilation time (> 24 h) (P = 0.016), blood transfusion amount (P = 0.006), length of hospital stay (P < 0.0001), and ICU stay (P < 0.0001) were significantly less in the MIVS group. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP), aortic cross-clamping, and operative time intervals were significantly longer in the MIVS group than in the matched FS group (P < 0.001). A multivariable analysis revealed a decreased risk of PPCs in patients undergoing MIVS (odds ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.006–0.180; P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

MIVS for isolated valve surgery reduces the risk of PPCs compared with the FS approach.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Raja SG, Navaratnarajah M. Impact of minimal access valve surgery on clinical outcomes: current best available evidence. J Card Surg. 2009;24(1):73–9.CrossRef Raja SG, Navaratnarajah M. Impact of minimal access valve surgery on clinical outcomes: current best available evidence. J Card Surg. 2009;24(1):73–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lamelas J, Sarria A, Santana O, Pineda AM, Lamas GA. Outcomes of minimally invasive valve surgery versus median sternotomy in patients age 75 years or greater. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91(1):79–84.CrossRef Lamelas J, Sarria A, Santana O, Pineda AM, Lamas GA. Outcomes of minimally invasive valve surgery versus median sternotomy in patients age 75 years or greater. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91(1):79–84.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cosgrove DM 3rd, Sabik JF. Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62(2):596–7.CrossRef Cosgrove DM 3rd, Sabik JF. Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62(2):596–7.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Weissman C. Pulmonary function after cardiac and thoracic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2000;13(1):47–51.CrossRef Weissman C. Pulmonary function after cardiac and thoracic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2000;13(1):47–51.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive versus median sternotomy valve surgery: propensity score matching
Authors
Mohamed Abdulkadir Mohamed
Cai Cheng
Xiang Wei
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1749-8090
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01669-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 1/2021 Go to the issue