Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Protocol

Protocol for a meta-narrative review on research paradigms addressing the urban built environment and human health

Authors: Jinhee Kim, Ben Harris-Roxas, Evelyne de Leeuw, David Lilley, Alana Crimeen, Peter Sainsbury

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Urban health is a field of research and practice that has attracted the interest of various disciplines. While it is encouraged for diverse disciplines to contribute to a multidisciplinary field of study such as urban health, this often results in tensions, conflicts or competition between the different traditions that stem from different epistemological backgrounds.
This meta-narrative review aims to identify and describe the multiple paradigms and articulate the underlying epistemological, ontological, methodological, and aetiological differences in their approaches. Articulating the paradigms not only contributes to the advancement of research, but also provides a framework for understanding the different policy beliefs and ideas policy actors hold and apply in the policy process.

Methods

We apply the meta-narrative method to systematic literature review which includes the following six iterative phases. The planning phase includes the finalisation of the review protocol and assembly of review team. The search phase includes a comprehensive literature search in key databases and a double-sided systematic snowballing method. We will search multidisciplinary databases including Web of Science, Scopus and ProQuest, and topic-specific databases including Urban Studies Abstracts (EBSCO), MEDLINE, and EMBASE from their inception onwards. Bibliometric analyses of this literature will be used to triangulate the mapping of the paradigms. The mapping phase includes identifying the dominant paradigms and landmark publications through agreement with the review team. In the appraisal phase, the literature will be assessed by their respective quality standards, followed by data extraction to identify the individual narratives in the conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and instrumental dimensions of each paradigm. The synthesis phase will review the data to compare and contrast and identify the overarching meta-narratives. The recommendation phase will include dissemination of the findings from the review.

Discussion

The meta-narrative review will reveal the how the different paradigms conceptualise, frame and prioritise urban health issues, their preferred methodologies to study the phenomenon, and the nature of the solutions to improve human health. This review will assist researchers and practitioners in understanding and interpreting evidence produced by other traditions that study urban health. Through this, urban health researchers and practitioners will be able to seek coherence in understanding, explaining, and exploring the urban health phenomenon.

Systematic review registration

Open Science Framework (https://​osf/​io/​tn8vk)
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1962. Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1962.
2.
go back to reference Lawrence R, Gatzweiler F. Wanted: a transdisciplinary knowledge domain for urban health. J Urban Health. 2017;94:592–6.CrossRef Lawrence R, Gatzweiler F. Wanted: a transdisciplinary knowledge domain for urban health. J Urban Health. 2017;94:592–6.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference O’Campo P, Kirst M, Schaefer-McDaniel N, Hwang S. Introducing a transdisciplinary approach to applied urban health research. In: Kirst M, Schaefer-McDaniel N, Hwang S, O’Campo P, editors. Converging disciplines: a transdisciplinary research approach to urban health problems. New York, NY: Springer; 2011. p. 3–11.CrossRef O’Campo P, Kirst M, Schaefer-McDaniel N, Hwang S. Introducing a transdisciplinary approach to applied urban health research. In: Kirst M, Schaefer-McDaniel N, Hwang S, O’Campo P, editors. Converging disciplines: a transdisciplinary research approach to urban health problems. New York, NY: Springer; 2011. p. 3–11.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kim J, de Leeuw E, Harris-Roxas B, Sainsbury P. The three paradigms on urban health. Eur J Public Health. 2020;30(Supplement_5):v586–7. Kim J, de Leeuw E, Harris-Roxas B, Sainsbury P. The three paradigms on urban health. Eur J Public Health. 2020;30(Supplement_5):v586–7.
18.
go back to reference Denzin N, Lincoln Y. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. 5th ed: SAGE; 2017. Denzin N, Lincoln Y. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. 5th ed: SAGE; 2017.
19.
go back to reference Flick U. Managing quality in qualitative research - SAGE research methods. London: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2007.CrossRef Flick U. Managing quality in qualitative research - SAGE research methods. London: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2007.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Baumgartner FR. Ideas, paradigms and confusions. J Eur Public Policy. 2014;21(3):475–80.CrossRef Baumgartner FR. Ideas, paradigms and confusions. J Eur Public Policy. 2014;21(3):475–80.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Wilder M. What is a policy paradigm? Overcoming epistemological hurdles in cross-disciplinary conceptual adaptation. In: Hogan J, Howlett M, editors. Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice: Discourses, Ideas and Anomalies in Public Policy Dynamics. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2015. p. 19–42.CrossRef Wilder M. What is a policy paradigm? Overcoming epistemological hurdles in cross-disciplinary conceptual adaptation. In: Hogan J, Howlett M, editors. Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice: Discourses, Ideas and Anomalies in Public Policy Dynamics. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2015. p. 19–42.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Protocol for a meta-narrative review on research paradigms addressing the urban built environment and human health
Authors
Jinhee Kim
Ben Harris-Roxas
Evelyne de Leeuw
David Lilley
Alana Crimeen
Peter Sainsbury
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01848-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Systematic Reviews 1/2021 Go to the issue