Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Heart and Vessels 8/2017

01-08-2017 | Original Article

Health-related quality of life prospectively evaluated by the 8-item short form after endovascular repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms

Authors: Takayoshi Kato, Mototsugu Tamaki, Tomohiro Tsunekawa, Yusuke Motoji, Akihiro Hirakawa, Yasuhide Okawa, Shinji Tomita

Published in: Heart and Vessels | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Open repair for infra-renal abdominal aortic and iliac artery aneurysms (AAAs) is a robust treatment. On the other hand, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been widespread because of its less invasiveness. However, patients after EVAR frequently require postoperative radiographic examinations and may feel anxiety for their endoleaks. We prospectively evaluated Health-related Quality of Life of the patients with these two fashions using the 8-item Short Form (SF-8). From 2011 to 2013, 89 consecutive elective cases of AAAs were treated. They were prospectively divided into EVAR and open repair groups but not randomly. The exclusion criteria were as follows: perioperative status for other surgeries, infectious aneurysm, severely deteriorated conditions, and patients who cannot answer for these questionnaire or show their consent. The SF-8 questionnaire was completed through interviews preoperatively, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. The SF-8 questionnaire was completed for 55 cases [EVAR group (ER): 25, open repair group (OR): 30]. There was no significant difference between these groups regarding patients’ characteristics except congestive heart disease. The preoperative scores of the SF-8 were similar in both groups except physical function and social function, which were lower in ER (p < 0.05). There was no operative death in both groups. Operative duration and hospital stay in EVAR were significantly shorter than those in OR (p < 0.05). Follow-up rate at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months was 100, 100, 68.0, and 64.0% in ER, and 100, 90.0, 80.0, and 66.6% in OR, respectively. During follow-up, both groups had no AAAs associated death. Regarding changes of the SF-8 scales, there were some trends at physical component summary score (PCS) and mental component summary score (MCS) in ER. The PCS decreased at 1 month, gradually increased at 3 months, and levelled off until 12 months. The MCS increased at 1 and 3 months, but gradually went down and almost stayed at the same level as preoperative one at 12 months. In OR, PCS and MCS decreased at 1 month and after that increased gradually at 3 and 6 months, and stayed the same at 12 months. The MCS recovered to preoperative score earlier than the PCS. In this study, EVAR did not show any significant mental disturbance based on the SF-8 for 1-year comparing to open repair.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hayashi K, Hirashiki A, Kodama A, Kobayashi K, Yasukawa Y, Shimizu M, Kondo T, Komori K, Murohara T (2016) Impact of preoperative regular physical activity on postoperative course after open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Heart Vessels 31:578–583CrossRefPubMed Hayashi K, Hirashiki A, Kodama A, Kobayashi K, Yasukawa Y, Shimizu M, Kondo T, Komori K, Murohara T (2016) Impact of preoperative regular physical activity on postoperative course after open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Heart Vessels 31:578–583CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Zhang S, Feng J, Li H, Zhang Y, Lu Q, Jing Z (2016) Open surgery (OS) versus endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for hemodynamically stable and unstable ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). Heart Vessels 31:1291–1302CrossRefPubMed Zhang S, Feng J, Li H, Zhang Y, Lu Q, Jing Z (2016) Open surgery (OS) versus endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for hemodynamically stable and unstable ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). Heart Vessels 31:1291–1302CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mouawad NJ, Leichtle SW, Manchio JV, Lampman RM, Halloran BG, Whitehouse Jr WM (2013) Construct domain analysis of patient health-related quality of life: physical and mental trajectory profiles following open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 4:1–6PubMed Mouawad NJ, Leichtle SW, Manchio JV, Lampman RM, Halloran BG, Whitehouse Jr WM (2013) Construct domain analysis of patient health-related quality of life: physical and mental trajectory profiles following open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 4:1–6PubMed
4.
go back to reference Aquino RV, Jones MA, Zullo TG, Missig-Carroll N, Makaroun MS (2001) Quality of life assessment in patients undergoing endovascular or conventional AAA repair. J Endovasc Ther 8:521–528CrossRefPubMed Aquino RV, Jones MA, Zullo TG, Missig-Carroll N, Makaroun MS (2001) Quality of life assessment in patients undergoing endovascular or conventional AAA repair. J Endovasc Ther 8:521–528CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Prinssen M, Buskens E, Blankensteijn JD, DREAM trial participants (2004) Quality of life after endovascular and open AAA repair. Results of a randomized trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 27:121–127CrossRefPubMed Prinssen M, Buskens E, Blankensteijn JD, DREAM trial participants (2004) Quality of life after endovascular and open AAA repair. Results of a randomized trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 27:121–127CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Aljabri B, Al Wahaibi K, Abner D, Mackenzie KS, Corriveau MM, Obrand DI, Meshefedjian G, Steinmetz OK (2006) Patient-reported quality of life after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: a prospective comparison of endovascular and open repair. J Vasc Surg 44:1182–1187CrossRefPubMed Aljabri B, Al Wahaibi K, Abner D, Mackenzie KS, Corriveau MM, Obrand DI, Meshefedjian G, Steinmetz OK (2006) Patient-reported quality of life after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: a prospective comparison of endovascular and open repair. J Vasc Surg 44:1182–1187CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dick F, Grobéty V, Immer FF, Do DD, Savolainen H, Carrel TP, Schmidli J (2008) Outcome and quality of life in patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a single center experience. World J Surg 32:987–994CrossRefPubMed Dick F, Grobéty V, Immer FF, Do DD, Savolainen H, Carrel TP, Schmidli J (2008) Outcome and quality of life in patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a single center experience. World J Surg 32:987–994CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Coughlin PA, Jackson D, White AD, Bailey MA, Farrow C, Scott DJA, Howell SJ (2013) Meta-analysis of prospective trials determining the short- and mid-term effect of elective open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms on quality of life. Br J Surg 100:448–455CrossRefPubMed Coughlin PA, Jackson D, White AD, Bailey MA, Farrow C, Scott DJA, Howell SJ (2013) Meta-analysis of prospective trials determining the short- and mid-term effect of elective open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms on quality of life. Br J Surg 100:448–455CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kayssi A, DeBord Smith A, Roche-Nagle G, Nguyen LL (2015) Health-related quality-of-life outcomes after open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 62:491–498CrossRefPubMed Kayssi A, DeBord Smith A, Roche-Nagle G, Nguyen LL (2015) Health-related quality-of-life outcomes after open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 62:491–498CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Fukuhara S, Suzukamo Y (2004) Manual of the SF-8: Japanese version. Institute for Health Outcomes & Process Evaluation Research, Kyoto Fukuhara S, Suzukamo Y (2004) Manual of the SF-8: Japanese version. Institute for Health Outcomes & Process Evaluation Research, Kyoto
11.
go back to reference McDaniel MD, Nehler MR, Santilli SM, Hiatt WR, Regensteiner JG, Goldstone J, McCarthy WJ, White JV (2000) Extended outcome assessment in the care of vascular diseases: revising the paradigm for the 21st century. Ad Hoc Committee to Study Outcomes Assessment, Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter. J Vasc Surg 32:1239–1250CrossRefPubMed McDaniel MD, Nehler MR, Santilli SM, Hiatt WR, Regensteiner JG, Goldstone J, McCarthy WJ, White JV (2000) Extended outcome assessment in the care of vascular diseases: revising the paradigm for the 21st century. Ad Hoc Committee to Study Outcomes Assessment, Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter. J Vasc Surg 32:1239–1250CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sugimoto M, Takegami M, Suzukamo Y, Fukuhara S, Kakehi Y (2008) Health-related quality of life in Japanese men with localized prostate cancer: assessment with the SF-8. Int J Urol 15(6):524–528CrossRefPubMed Sugimoto M, Takegami M, Suzukamo Y, Fukuhara S, Kakehi Y (2008) Health-related quality of life in Japanese men with localized prostate cancer: assessment with the SF-8. Int J Urol 15(6):524–528CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tominaga K, Kato M, Takeda H, Shimoyama Y, Umegaki E, Iwakiri R, Furuta K, Sakurai K, Odaka T, Kusunoki H, Nagahara A, Iwakiri K, Furuta T, Murakami K, Miwa H, Kinoshita Y, Haruma K, Takahashi S, Watanabe S, Higuchi K, Kusano M, Fujimoto K, Arakawa T, G-PRIDE Study Group (2014) A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of rikkunshito for patients with non-erosive reflux disease refractory to proton-pump inhibitor: the G-PRIDE study. J Gastroenterol 49(10):1392–1405CrossRefPubMed Tominaga K, Kato M, Takeda H, Shimoyama Y, Umegaki E, Iwakiri R, Furuta K, Sakurai K, Odaka T, Kusunoki H, Nagahara A, Iwakiri K, Furuta T, Murakami K, Miwa H, Kinoshita Y, Haruma K, Takahashi S, Watanabe S, Higuchi K, Kusano M, Fujimoto K, Arakawa T, G-PRIDE Study Group (2014) A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of rikkunshito for patients with non-erosive reflux disease refractory to proton-pump inhibitor: the G-PRIDE study. J Gastroenterol 49(10):1392–1405CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kato NP, Okada I, Imamura T, Kagami Y, Endo M, Nitta D, Fujino T, Muraoka H, Minatsuki S, Maki H, Inaba T, Kinoshita O, Nawata K, Hatano M, Yao A, Kyo S, Ono M, Jaarsma T, Kinugawa K (2015) Quality of life and influential factors in patients implanted with a left ventricular assist device. Circ J 79(10):2186–2192CrossRefPubMed Kato NP, Okada I, Imamura T, Kagami Y, Endo M, Nitta D, Fujino T, Muraoka H, Minatsuki S, Maki H, Inaba T, Kinoshita O, Nawata K, Hatano M, Yao A, Kyo S, Ono M, Jaarsma T, Kinugawa K (2015) Quality of life and influential factors in patients implanted with a left ventricular assist device. Circ J 79(10):2186–2192CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kato T, Tomita S, Handa N, Ueno Y (2010) Health-related quality of life evaluated by the eight-item short form after cardiovascular surgery. Gen. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 58:612–616CrossRef Kato T, Tomita S, Handa N, Ueno Y (2010) Health-related quality of life evaluated by the eight-item short form after cardiovascular surgery. Gen. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 58:612–616CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Health-related quality of life prospectively evaluated by the 8-item short form after endovascular repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms
Authors
Takayoshi Kato
Mototsugu Tamaki
Tomohiro Tsunekawa
Yusuke Motoji
Akihiro Hirakawa
Yasuhide Okawa
Shinji Tomita
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Heart and Vessels / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0910-8327
Electronic ISSN: 1615-2573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-017-0956-9

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

Heart and Vessels 8/2017 Go to the issue