Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Software

Health Equity Assessment Toolkit (HEAT): software for exploring and comparing health inequalities in countries

Authors: Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor, Devaki Nambiar, Anne Schlotheuber, Daniel Reidpath, Zev Ross

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

It is widely recognised that the pursuit of sustainable development cannot be accomplished without addressing inequality, or observed differences between subgroups of a population. Monitoring health inequalities allows for the identification of health topics where major group differences exist, dimensions of inequality that must be prioritised to effect improvements in multiple health domains, and also population subgroups that are multiply disadvantaged. While availability of data to monitor health inequalities is gradually improving, there is a commensurate need to increase, within countries, the technical capacity for analysis of these data and interpretation of results for decision-making. Prior efforts to build capacity have yielded demand for a toolkit with the computational ability to display disaggregated data and summary measures of inequality in an interactive and customisable fashion that would facilitate interpretation and reporting of health inequality in a given country.

Methods

To answer this demand, the Health Equity Assessment Toolkit (HEAT), was developed between 2014 and 2016. The software, which contains the World Health Organization’s Health Equity Monitor database, allows the assessment of inequalities within a country using over 30 reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health indicators and five dimensions of inequality (economic status, education, place of residence, subnational region and child’s sex, where applicable).

Results/Conclusion

HEAT was beta-tested in 2015 as part of ongoing capacity building workshops on health inequality monitoring. This is the first and only application of its kind; further developments are proposed to introduce an upload data feature, translate it into different languages and increase interactivity of the software. This article will present the main features and functionalities of HEAT and discuss its relevance and use for health inequality monitoring.
Literature
2.
9.
go back to reference Hosseinpoor AR, Bergen N, Koller T, Prasad A, Schlotheuber A, Valentine N, Lynch J, Vega J. Equity-oriented monitoring in the context of universal health coverage. PLoS Med. 2014;11(9):e1001727.8.CrossRef Hosseinpoor AR, Bergen N, Koller T, Prasad A, Schlotheuber A, Valentine N, Lynch J, Vega J. Equity-oriented monitoring in the context of universal health coverage. PLoS Med. 2014;11(9):e1001727.8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hosseinpoor AR, Victora CG, Bergen N, Barros AJ, Boerma T. Towards universal health coverage: the role of within-country wealth-related inequality in 28 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89(12):881–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hosseinpoor AR, Victora CG, Bergen N, Barros AJ, Boerma T. Towards universal health coverage: the role of within-country wealth-related inequality in 28 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89(12):881–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Hosseinpoor AR, Bergen N, Schlotheuber A. Promoting health equity: WHO health inequality monitoring at global and national levels. Glob Health Action. 2015;8:29034.CrossRef Hosseinpoor AR, Bergen N, Schlotheuber A. Promoting health equity: WHO health inequality monitoring at global and national levels. Glob Health Action. 2015;8:29034.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hosseinpoor AR, Bergen N, Barros DA, Wong KLM, Boerma T, Victora CG. Monitoring subnational regional inequalities in health: measurement approaches and challenges. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15(1):1–13.CrossRef Hosseinpoor AR, Bergen N, Barros DA, Wong KLM, Boerma T, Victora CG. Monitoring subnational regional inequalities in health: measurement approaches and challenges. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15(1):1–13.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Reidpath DD, Morel CM, Mecaskey JW, Allotey P. The millennium development goals fail poor children: the case for equity-adjusted measures. PLoS Med. 2009;6(4):e1000062.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Reidpath DD, Morel CM, Mecaskey JW, Allotey P. The millennium development goals fail poor children: the case for equity-adjusted measures. PLoS Med. 2009;6(4):e1000062.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Harper S, Lynch J. Methods for measuring cancer disparities: using data relevant to Healthy People 2010 cancer-related objectives. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2005. Harper S, Lynch J. Methods for measuring cancer disparities: using data relevant to Healthy People 2010 cancer-related objectives. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2005.
17.
go back to reference National Cancer Institute. Health Disparities Calculator, Version 1.2.4 - October 29, 2013. Bethesda; Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program and Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute; 2013. National Cancer Institute. Health Disparities Calculator, Version 1.2.4 - October 29, 2013. Bethesda; Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program and Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute; 2013.
22.
go back to reference Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2009.CrossRef Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2009.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Health Equity Assessment Toolkit (HEAT): software for exploring and comparing health inequalities in countries
Authors
Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor
Devaki Nambiar
Anne Schlotheuber
Daniel Reidpath
Zev Ross
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0229-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2016 Go to the issue