Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Anesthesiology 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Mi-jung Yun, Jung-Won Hwang, Sung-Hoon Kim, Hyo-Ju Hong, Young-Tae Jeon, Hee-Pyoung Park

Published in: BMC Anesthesiology | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The sniffing position (neck flexion by head elevation and head extension) is commonly used for insertion of a laryngeal mask airway. However, the appropriate degrees of head elevation and head extension are unclear. In the present study, the success rate of ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway (LMA ProSeal) insertion using two degrees of head elevation was evaluated.

Methods

This prospective randomized, controlled study included 80 adult patients aged 18 to 90 years. In the 3 cm (n = 40) and 6 cm (n = 40) groups, the LMA ProSeal was inserted while the head was elevated 3 cm and 6 cm, respectively, using a pillow of the corresponding height. The success rate, and incidence of blood staining on cuff, sore throat and hoarseness were assessed. The alignments of laryngeal and oral axes were also evaluated.

Results

The first attempt success rate was higher in the 3 cm than the 6 cm group (87 % vs. 60 %, P = 0.014). In 86 % of patients in the 6 cm group and 50 % of patients in the 3 cm group in whom the second attempt failed, the third insertion attempt was successful by using a pillow height of the opposite group. The alignments of the two axes were not different between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

The first attempt success rate of ProSeal laryngeal mask insertion was higher with 3 cm than 6 cm head elevation in adult patients.

Trial registration

Identifiers: NCT02058030 (08/05/2015), Unique Protocol ID: phdkim1.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Takenaka I, Aoyama K, Iwagaki T, Ishimura H, Kadoya T. The sniffing position provides greater occipito-atlanto-axial angulation than simple head extension: a radiological study. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54:129–33.CrossRefPubMed Takenaka I, Aoyama K, Iwagaki T, Ishimura H, Kadoya T. The sniffing position provides greater occipito-atlanto-axial angulation than simple head extension: a radiological study. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54:129–33.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Horton WA, Fahy L, Charters P. Defining a standard intubating position using “angle finder”. Br J Anaesth. 1989;62:6–12.CrossRefPubMed Horton WA, Fahy L, Charters P. Defining a standard intubating position using “angle finder”. Br J Anaesth. 1989;62:6–12.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Brimacombe J, Berry A. Laryngeal mask airway insertion. A comparison of the standard versus neutral position in normal patients with a view to its use in cervical spine instability. Anaesthesia. 1993;48:670–1.CrossRefPubMed Brimacombe J, Berry A. Laryngeal mask airway insertion. A comparison of the standard versus neutral position in normal patients with a view to its use in cervical spine instability. Anaesthesia. 1993;48:670–1.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Jun JH, Baik HJ, Kim JH, Kim YJ, Chang RN. Comparison of the ease of laryngeal mask airway ProSeal insertion and the fiberoptic scoring according to the head position and the presence of a difficult airway. Korean J Anaesthsiol. 2011;60:244–9.CrossRef Jun JH, Baik HJ, Kim JH, Kim YJ, Chang RN. Comparison of the ease of laryngeal mask airway ProSeal insertion and the fiberoptic scoring according to the head position and the presence of a difficult airway. Korean J Anaesthsiol. 2011;60:244–9.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Keller C. A comparison of four methods for assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in paediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 2001;11:319–21.CrossRefPubMed Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Keller C. A comparison of four methods for assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in paediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 2001;11:319–21.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Brimacomb J, Keller C, Kurian S, Myles J. Reliability of epigastric auscultation to detect gastric insufflation. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88:127–9.CrossRefPubMed Brimacomb J, Keller C, Kurian S, Myles J. Reliability of epigastric auscultation to detect gastric insufflation. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88:127–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Miller RD, Pardo M, Stoelting RK. Airway management. In: Miller RD, Pardo MC, editors. Basics of anesthesia. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2011. p. 219–51. Miller RD, Pardo M, Stoelting RK. Airway management. In: Miller RD, Pardo MC, editors. Basics of anesthesia. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2011. p. 219–51.
10.
go back to reference Park SH, Park HP, Jeon YT, Hwang JW, Kim JH, Bahk JH. A comparison of direct laryngoscopic views depending on pillow height. J Anaesth. 2010;24:526–30.CrossRef Park SH, Park HP, Jeon YT, Hwang JW, Kim JH, Bahk JH. A comparison of direct laryngoscopic views depending on pillow height. J Anaesth. 2010;24:526–30.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Mi-jung Yun
Jung-Won Hwang
Sung-Hoon Kim
Hyo-Ju Hong
Young-Tae Jeon
Hee-Pyoung Park
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2253
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0220-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Anesthesiology 1/2015 Go to the issue