Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 13-03-2024 | Hallux Valgus | Scientific Article

Automatic estimation of hallux valgus angle using deep neural network with axis-based annotation

Authors: Ryutaro Takeda, Hiroyasu Mizuhara, Akihiro Uchio, Toshiko Iidaka, Kenta Makabe, Taro Kasai, Yasunori Omata, Noriko Yoshimura, Sakae Tanaka, Takumi Matsumoto

Published in: Skeletal Radiology

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

We developed the deep neural network (DNN) model to automatically measure hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) on foot radiographs. The objective is to assess the accuracy of the model by comparing to the manual measurement of foot and ankle surgeons.

Materials and methods

A DNN was developed to predict the bone axes of the first proximal phalanx and all metatarsals from the first to the fifth in foot radiographs. The dataset used for model development consisted of 1798 radiographs collected from a population-based cohort and patients at our foot and ankle clinic. The retrospective validation cohort comprised of 92 radiographs obtained from 92 consecutive patients visiting our foot and ankle clinic. The mean absolute error (MAE) between automatic measurements by the model and the median of manual measurements by three foot and ankle surgeons was compared to 3° using one-tailed t-test and was also compared to the inter-rater difference in manual measurements among the three surgeons using two-tailed paired t-test.

Results

The MAE for HVA was 1.3° (upper limit of 95% CI 1.6°), and this was significantly smaller than the inter-rater difference of 2.0 ± 0.2° among the surgeons, demonstrating the superior accuracy of the model. In contrast, the MAE for IMA was 0.8° (upper limit of 95% CI 1.0°) that showed no significant difference from the inter-rater difference of 1.0 ± 0.1° among the surgeons.

Conclusion

Our model demonstrated the ability to measure the HVA and IMA with an accuracy comparable to that of specialists.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mann RA, Coughlin MJ. Hallux valgus–etiology, anatomy, treatment and surgical considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;157:31–41.CrossRef Mann RA, Coughlin MJ. Hallux valgus–etiology, anatomy, treatment and surgical considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;157:31–41.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Vanore J V, Christensen JC, Kravitz SR, Schuberth JM, Thomas JL, Weil LS, et al.(2003) Diagnosis and treatment of first metatarsophalangeal joint disorders. Section 1: Hallux Valgus Clinical Practice Guideline First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Disorders. J Foot Ankle Surg. 42 3:112-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1067-2516(03)70014-3 Vanore J V, Christensen JC, Kravitz SR, Schuberth JM, Thomas JL, Weil LS, et al.(2003) Diagnosis and treatment of first metatarsophalangeal joint disorders. Section 1: Hallux Valgus Clinical Practice Guideline First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Disorders. J Foot Ankle Surg. 42 3:112-123. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1067-2516(03)70014-3
Metadata
Title
Automatic estimation of hallux valgus angle using deep neural network with axis-based annotation
Authors
Ryutaro Takeda
Hiroyasu Mizuhara
Akihiro Uchio
Toshiko Iidaka
Kenta Makabe
Taro Kasai
Yasunori Omata
Noriko Yoshimura
Sakae Tanaka
Takumi Matsumoto
Publication date
13-03-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-024-04618-2