Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 11/2021

01-11-2021 | Hallux Valgus | Original Paper

A prospective study to compare the operative outcomes of minimally invasive proximal and distal chevron metatarsal osteotomy for moderate-to-severe hallux valgus deformity

Authors: Jun Young Choi, Byung Ho Kim, Jin Soo Suh

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 11/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery (MIS)-distal chevron metatarsal osteotomy (DCMO) for the correction of moderate-to-severe hallux valgus deformity is unclear. This study aimed to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of our novel MIS-proximal chevron metatarsal osteotomy (PCMO) with those of MIS-DCMO performed during the same timeframe.

Methods

We prospectively compared the outcomes of patients who underwent MIS-PCMO (n = 20 patients; 22 cases) with those of patients who underwent MIS-DCMO (n = 23 patients; 26 cases) for moderate-to-severe hallux valgus deformity (hallux valgus angle [HVA] ≥ 30° and first-to-second intermetatarsal angle [IMA] ≥ 13°) between June 2017 and January 2019. The minimum follow-up duration for study inclusion was two years. The HVA, IMA, distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), relative length of the second metatarsal, medial sesamoid position, and Meary’s angle to evaluate the degree of deformity correction and its maintenance were measured pre-operatively and at the final follow-up.

Results

Compared with MIS-DCMO, MIS-PCMO resulted in significantly greater correction of the HVA (P < 0.001) and IMA (P = 0.01), along with Meary’s angle improvement (P < 0.001); however, the DMAA worsened (P = 0 .01). Furthermore, a significantly greater change was found in the relative second metatarsal length in the MIS-DCMO group (P = 0.01). No significant between-group differences were noted in the correction of the medial sesamoid position (P = 0.445).

Conclusion

Compared with MIS-DCMO, MIS-PCMO can be a better option for correcting moderate-to-severe hallux valgus deformities. However, this technique should be applied carefully when the pre-operative DMAA is already large because the DMAA can become worse post-operatively.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Choi JY, Yoon HH, Suh YM, Suh JS (2017) Surgical correction of hallux valgus complicated with adult-type pes plano-valgus. J Orthop Surg 25(1):1–6CrossRef Choi JY, Yoon HH, Suh YM, Suh JS (2017) Surgical correction of hallux valgus complicated with adult-type pes plano-valgus. J Orthop Surg 25(1):1–6CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Awrejcewicz J, Szymanowska O et al (2018) Effects of severe hallux valgus on metatarsal stress and the metatarsophalangeal loading during balanced standing: a finite element analysis. Comput Biol Med 1(97):1–7CrossRef Zhang Y, Awrejcewicz J, Szymanowska O et al (2018) Effects of severe hallux valgus on metatarsal stress and the metatarsophalangeal loading during balanced standing: a finite element analysis. Comput Biol Med 1(97):1–7CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nix S, Smith M, Vicenzino B (2010) Prevalence of hallux valgus in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res 27(3):21CrossRef Nix S, Smith M, Vicenzino B (2010) Prevalence of hallux valgus in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res 27(3):21CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Coughlin MJ, Anderson RB (2014) Hallux valgus. In: Coughlin MJ, Saltzman CL, Anderson RB (eds) Mann’s surgery of the foot and ankle, 9th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 155–321 Coughlin MJ, Anderson RB (2014) Hallux valgus. In: Coughlin MJ, Saltzman CL, Anderson RB (eds) Mann’s surgery of the foot and ankle, 9th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 155–321
5.
go back to reference Bia A, Guerra-Pinto F, Pereira BS, Corte-Real N, Olivia XM (2018) Percutaneous osteotomies in hallux valgus: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg 57:123–130CrossRef Bia A, Guerra-Pinto F, Pereira BS, Corte-Real N, Olivia XM (2018) Percutaneous osteotomies in hallux valgus: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg 57:123–130CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Brogan K, Voller T, Gee C, Borbely T, Palmer S (2014) Third generation minimally invasive correction of hallux valgus: technique and early outcomes. Int Orthop 38(10):2115–2121CrossRef Brogan K, Voller T, Gee C, Borbely T, Palmer S (2014) Third generation minimally invasive correction of hallux valgus: technique and early outcomes. Int Orthop 38(10):2115–2121CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lee M, Walsh J, Smith MM, Ling J, Wines A, Lam P (2017) Hallux valgus correction comparing percutaneous chevron/Akin (PECA) and open scarf/Akin osteotomies. Foot Ankle Int 38(8):838–846CrossRef Lee M, Walsh J, Smith MM, Ling J, Wines A, Lam P (2017) Hallux valgus correction comparing percutaneous chevron/Akin (PECA) and open scarf/Akin osteotomies. Foot Ankle Int 38(8):838–846CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Malagelada F, Sahirad C, Dalmau-Pastor M et al (2019) Minimally invasive surgery for hallux valgus: a systematic review of current surgical technique. Int Orthop 43:625–637CrossRef Malagelada F, Sahirad C, Dalmau-Pastor M et al (2019) Minimally invasive surgery for hallux valgus: a systematic review of current surgical technique. Int Orthop 43:625–637CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lucas y Hernandez J, Golanó P, Roshan-Zamir S, Darcel V, Chauveaux D, Laffenêtre O (2016) Treatment of moderate hallux valgus by percutaneous, extra-articular reverse-L Chevron (PERC) osteotomy. Bone Joint J 98-B(3):365–373CrossRef Lucas y Hernandez J, Golanó P, Roshan-Zamir S, Darcel V, Chauveaux D, Laffenêtre O (2016) Treatment of moderate hallux valgus by percutaneous, extra-articular reverse-L Chevron (PERC) osteotomy. Bone Joint J 98-B(3):365–373CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Holme TJ, Sivaloganathan SS, Patel B, Kunasingam K (2020) Third-generation minimally invasive chevron Akin osteotomy for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int 41(1):50–56CrossRef Holme TJ, Sivaloganathan SS, Patel B, Kunasingam K (2020) Third-generation minimally invasive chevron Akin osteotomy for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int 41(1):50–56CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Vernois J, Redfern D (2013) Percutaneous Chevron; the union of classic stable fixed approach and percutaneous technique. Fuss Sprunggelenk 11(2):70–75CrossRef Vernois J, Redfern D (2013) Percutaneous Chevron; the union of classic stable fixed approach and percutaneous technique. Fuss Sprunggelenk 11(2):70–75CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kaufmann G, Dammerer D, Heyenbrock F, Braito M, Moertlbauer L, Liebensteiner M (2019) Minimally invasive versus open chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: a randomized controlled trial. Int Orthop 43:343–350CrossRef Kaufmann G, Dammerer D, Heyenbrock F, Braito M, Moertlbauer L, Liebensteiner M (2019) Minimally invasive versus open chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: a randomized controlled trial. Int Orthop 43:343–350CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lai MC, Rikhraj IS, Woo YL, Yeo W, Sean YC, Koo K (2018) Clinical and radiological outcomes comparing percutaneous chevron-Akin osteotomies vs open scarf-Akin osteotomies for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int 39(3):311–317CrossRef Lai MC, Rikhraj IS, Woo YL, Yeo W, Sean YC, Koo K (2018) Clinical and radiological outcomes comparing percutaneous chevron-Akin osteotomies vs open scarf-Akin osteotomies for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int 39(3):311–317CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Singh MS, Khurana A, Kapoor D, Katekar S, Kumar A, Vishwakarma G (2020) Minimally invasive vs open distal metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus–a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Orthop Trauma 11:348–356CrossRef Singh MS, Khurana A, Kapoor D, Katekar S, Kumar A, Vishwakarma G (2020) Minimally invasive vs open distal metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus–a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Orthop Trauma 11:348–356CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Choi JY, Suh YM, Yeom JW, Suh JS (2017) Comparison of postoperative height changes of the second metatarsal among 3 osteotomy methods for hallux valgus deformity correction. Foot Ankle Int 38(1):20–26CrossRef Choi JY, Suh YM, Yeom JW, Suh JS (2017) Comparison of postoperative height changes of the second metatarsal among 3 osteotomy methods for hallux valgus deformity correction. Foot Ankle Int 38(1):20–26CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dalmau-Pastor M, Malagelada F, Cordier G, Del Vecchio JJ, Ghioldi ME, Vega J (2020) Anatomical study of minimally invasive lateral release techniques for hallux valgus treatment. Foot Ankle Int 41(8):984–992CrossRef Dalmau-Pastor M, Malagelada F, Cordier G, Del Vecchio JJ, Ghioldi ME, Vega J (2020) Anatomical study of minimally invasive lateral release techniques for hallux valgus treatment. Foot Ankle Int 41(8):984–992CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Frigg A, Azugg S, Maquieira G, Pellegrino A (2019) Stiffness and range of motion after minimally invasive chevron-Akin and open scarf-Akin procedures. Foot Ankle Int 460(5):515–525CrossRef Frigg A, Azugg S, Maquieira G, Pellegrino A (2019) Stiffness and range of motion after minimally invasive chevron-Akin and open scarf-Akin procedures. Foot Ankle Int 460(5):515–525CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hardy RH, Clapham JC (1951) Observations on hallux valgus; based on a controlled series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 33-B(3):376–391CrossRef Hardy RH, Clapham JC (1951) Observations on hallux valgus; based on a controlled series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 33-B(3):376–391CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ibrahim T, Beiri A, Azzabi M, Best AJ, Taylor GJ, Menon DK (2007) Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales. J Foot Ankle Surg 46(2):65–75CrossRef Ibrahim T, Beiri A, Azzabi M, Best AJ, Taylor GJ, Menon DK (2007) Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales. J Foot Ankle Surg 46(2):65–75CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15(7):349–353CrossRef Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15(7):349–353CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, Conti SF, Van Swearingen JM (2005) Evidence of validity for the foot and ankle ability measure. Foot Ankle Int 26(11):968–983CrossRef Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, Conti SF, Van Swearingen JM (2005) Evidence of validity for the foot and ankle ability measure. Foot Ankle Int 26(11):968–983CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lee KB, Cho NY, Park HW, Seon JK, Lee SH (2015) A comparison of proximal and distal chevron osteotomy, both with lateral soft-tissue release, for moderate to severe hallux valgus in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral correction. Bone Joint J 97-B:202–207CrossRef Lee KB, Cho NY, Park HW, Seon JK, Lee SH (2015) A comparison of proximal and distal chevron osteotomy, both with lateral soft-tissue release, for moderate to severe hallux valgus in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral correction. Bone Joint J 97-B:202–207CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Park CH, Jang JH, Lee SH, Lee WC (2013) A comparison of proximal and distal chevron osteotomy for the correction of moderate hallux valgus deformity. Bone Joint J 95-B:649–656CrossRef Park CH, Jang JH, Lee SH, Lee WC (2013) A comparison of proximal and distal chevron osteotomy for the correction of moderate hallux valgus deformity. Bone Joint J 95-B:649–656CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ahn JY, Lee HS, Seo JH, Kim JY (2016) Second metatarsal transfer lesions due to first metatarsal shortening after distal chevron metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int 37(6):589–595CrossRef Ahn JY, Lee HS, Seo JH, Kim JY (2016) Second metatarsal transfer lesions due to first metatarsal shortening after distal chevron metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int 37(6):589–595CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Campbell B, Miller MC, William L, Conti SF (2018) Pilot study of a 3-dimensional method for analysis of pronation of the first metatarsal of hallux valgus patients. Foot Ankle Int 39:1449–1456CrossRef Campbell B, Miller MC, William L, Conti SF (2018) Pilot study of a 3-dimensional method for analysis of pronation of the first metatarsal of hallux valgus patients. Foot Ankle Int 39:1449–1456CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Wagner E, Wagner P (2020) Metatarsal pronation in hallux valgus deformity: a review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 4(6):e20.00091PubMedPubMedCentral Wagner E, Wagner P (2020) Metatarsal pronation in hallux valgus deformity: a review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 4(6):e20.00091PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Yamaguchi S, Sasho T, Endo J et al (2015) Shape of the lateral edge of the first metatarsal head changes depending on the rotation and inclination of the first metatarsal: a study using digitally reconstructed radiographs. J Orthop Sci 20:868–878CrossRef Yamaguchi S, Sasho T, Endo J et al (2015) Shape of the lateral edge of the first metatarsal head changes depending on the rotation and inclination of the first metatarsal: a study using digitally reconstructed radiographs. J Orthop Sci 20:868–878CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Shibuya N, Kyprios EM, Panchani PN, Martin LR, Thorud JC, Jupiter DC (2018) Factors associated with early loss of hallux valgus correction. J Foot Ankle Surg 57:236–240CrossRef Shibuya N, Kyprios EM, Panchani PN, Martin LR, Thorud JC, Jupiter DC (2018) Factors associated with early loss of hallux valgus correction. J Foot Ankle Surg 57:236–240CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A prospective study to compare the operative outcomes of minimally invasive proximal and distal chevron metatarsal osteotomy for moderate-to-severe hallux valgus deformity
Authors
Jun Young Choi
Byung Ho Kim
Jin Soo Suh
Publication date
01-11-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 11/2021
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05106-1

Other articles of this Issue 11/2021

International Orthopaedics 11/2021 Go to the issue