Published in:
01-06-2019 | Glioma | Original Article - Neurosurgery general
Establishing risk-adjusted quality indicators in surgery using administrative data—an example from neurosurgery
Authors:
Stephanie Schipmann, Julian Varghese, Tobias Brix, Michael Schwake, Dennis Keurhorst, Sebastian Lohmann, Eric Suero Molina, Uwe Max Mauer, Martin Dugas, Nils Warneke, Walter Stummer
Published in:
Acta Neurochirurgica
|
Issue 6/2019
Login to get access
Abstract
Background
The current draft of the German Hospital Structure Law requires remuneration to incorporate quality indicators. For neurosurgery, several quality indicators have been discussed, such as 30-day readmission, reoperation, or mortality rates; the rates of infections; or the length of stay. When comparing neurosurgical departments regarding these indicators, very heterogeneous patient spectrums complicate benchmarking due to the lack of risk adjustment.
Objective
In this study, we performed an analysis of quality indicators and possible risk adjustment, based only on administrative data.
Methods
All adult patients that were treated as inpatients for a brain or spinal tumour at our neurosurgical department between 2013 and 2017 were assessed for the abovementioned quality indicators. DRG-related data such as relative weight, PCCL (patient clinical complexity level), ICD-10 major diagnosis category, secondary diagnoses, age and sex were obtained. The age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was calculated. Logistic regression analyses were performed in order to correlate quality indicators with administrative data.
Results
Overall, 2623 cases were enrolled into the study. Most patients were treated for glioma (n = 1055, 40.2%). The CCI did not correlate with the quality indicators, whereas PCCL showed a positive correlation with 30-day readmission and reoperation, SSI and nosocomial infection rates.
Conclusion
All previously discussed quality indicators are easily derived from administrative data. Administrative data alone might not be sufficient for adequate risk adjustment as they do not reflect the endogenous risk of the patient and are influenced by certain complications during inpatient stay. Appropriate concepts for risk adjustment should be compiled on the basis of prospectively designed registry studies.