Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2/2019

01-09-2019 | Glioblastoma | Clinical Study

Phase I/II study of bevacizumab with BKM120, an oral PI3K inhibitor, in patients with refractory solid tumors (phase I) and relapsed/refractory glioblastoma (phase II)

Authors: John D. Hainsworth, Kevin P. Becker, Tarek Mekhail, Sajeel A. Chowdhary, Janice Faulkner Eakle, David Wright, Robert M. Langdon, Kathleen J. Yost, Gilbert Darin Anthony Padula, Kimberly West-Osterfield, Meredith Scarberry, Candice A. Shaifer, Mythili Shastry, Howard A. Burris III, Kent Shih

Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Current bevacizumab-based regimens have failed to improve survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. To improve treatment efficacy, we evaluated bevacizumab + BKM120, an oral pan-class I PI3K inhibitor, in this patient population.

Methods

A brief phase I study established the optimal BKM120 dose to administer with standard-dose bevacizumab. BKM120 60 mg PO daily + bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks in 28-day cycles was then administered to patients with relapsed/refractory glioblastoma in the phase II portion.

Results

Eighty-eight patients enrolled (phase I, 12; phase II, 76). In phase I, BKM120 80 mg PO daily produced dose limiting toxicity in 3 of 6 patients; a BKM120 dose of 60 mg PO daily was established as the maximum tolerated dose. In phase II, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months (95% CI 3.4, 5.4), PFS at 6 months was 36.5%, and the overall response rate was 26%. Forty-two patients (57%) experienced one or more serious treatment related toxicities. The most common CNS toxicities included mood alteration (17%) and confusion (12%); however, these were often difficult to classify as treatment- versus tumor-related.

Conclusions

The efficacy seen in this study is similar to the efficacy previously reported with single-agent bevacizumab. This regimen was poorly tolerated, despite the low daily dose of BKM120. Further development of this combination for the treatment of glioblastoma is not recommended.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Iwamoto FM, Abrey LE, Beal K et al (2009) Patterns of relapse and prognosis after bevacizumab failure in recurrent glioblastoma. Neurology. 73(15):1200–1206CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Iwamoto FM, Abrey LE, Beal K et al (2009) Patterns of relapse and prognosis after bevacizumab failure in recurrent glioblastoma. Neurology. 73(15):1200–1206CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Rahman R, Hempfling K, Norden AD et al (2014) Retrospective study of carmustine or lomustine with bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma patients who have failed prior bevacizumab. Neuro-Oncology 16(11):1523–1529CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rahman R, Hempfling K, Norden AD et al (2014) Retrospective study of carmustine or lomustine with bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma patients who have failed prior bevacizumab. Neuro-Oncology 16(11):1523–1529CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Friedman HS, Prados MD, Wen PY et al (2009) Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 27:4733–4740CrossRefPubMed Friedman HS, Prados MD, Wen PY et al (2009) Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 27:4733–4740CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Vredenburgh JJ, Desjardins A, Herndon JE et al (2007) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol. 25(30):4722–4729CrossRefPubMed Vredenburgh JJ, Desjardins A, Herndon JE et al (2007) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol. 25(30):4722–4729CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Chinot OL, Wick W, Mason W et al (2014) Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy–temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 370(8):709–722CrossRefPubMed Chinot OL, Wick W, Mason W et al (2014) Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy–temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 370(8):709–722CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Wick W, Gorlia T, Bendszuz M et al (2017) Lomustine and bevacizumab in progressive glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 377:1954–1963CrossRefPubMed Wick W, Gorlia T, Bendszuz M et al (2017) Lomustine and bevacizumab in progressive glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 377:1954–1963CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Iwamoto FM, Lamborn KR, Robins HI et al (2010) Phase II trial of pazopanib (GW786034), an oral multi-targeted angiogenesis inhibitor, for adults with recurrent glioblastoma (North American Brain Tumor Consortium Study 06–02). Neuro Oncology. 12(8):855–861CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Iwamoto FM, Lamborn KR, Robins HI et al (2010) Phase II trial of pazopanib (GW786034), an oral multi-targeted angiogenesis inhibitor, for adults with recurrent glioblastoma (North American Brain Tumor Consortium Study 06–02). Neuro Oncology. 12(8):855–861CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Batchelor TT, Mulholland P, Neyns B et al (2013) Phase III randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cediranib as monotherapy, and in combination with lomustine, versus lomustine alone in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 31(26):3212–3218CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Batchelor TT, Mulholland P, Neyns B et al (2013) Phase III randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cediranib as monotherapy, and in combination with lomustine, versus lomustine alone in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 31(26):3212–3218CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference De Groot JF, Lamborn KR, Chang SM et al (2011) Phase II study of aflibercept in recurrent malignant glioma: a North American Brain Tumor Consortium study. J Clin Oncol. 29(19):2689–2695CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral De Groot JF, Lamborn KR, Chang SM et al (2011) Phase II study of aflibercept in recurrent malignant glioma: a North American Brain Tumor Consortium study. J Clin Oncol. 29(19):2689–2695CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Liu W, James CD, Frederick L, Alderete BE, Jenkins RB (1997) PTEN/MMACI mutations and EGFR amplification in glioblastomas. Cancer Res. 57(23):5254–5267PubMed Liu W, James CD, Frederick L, Alderete BE, Jenkins RB (1997) PTEN/MMACI mutations and EGFR amplification in glioblastomas. Cancer Res. 57(23):5254–5267PubMed
13.
go back to reference Chakravarti A, Zhai G, Suzuki Y et al (2004) The prognostic significance of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway in human gliomas. J Clin Oncol. 22(10):1926–1933CrossRefPubMed Chakravarti A, Zhai G, Suzuki Y et al (2004) The prognostic significance of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway in human gliomas. J Clin Oncol. 22(10):1926–1933CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wachsberger PR, Lawrence YR, Liu Y et al (2014) Hsp90 inhibition enhances PI-3 kinase inhibition and radiosensitivity in glioblastoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 140(4):573–582CrossRefPubMed Wachsberger PR, Lawrence YR, Liu Y et al (2014) Hsp90 inhibition enhances PI-3 kinase inhibition and radiosensitivity in glioblastoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 140(4):573–582CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Maira SM, Pecchi S, Huang A et al (2012) Identification and characterization of NVP-BKM120, an orally available pan-class I PI3-kinase inhibitor. Mol Cancer Ther. 11(2):317–328CrossRefPubMed Maira SM, Pecchi S, Huang A et al (2012) Identification and characterization of NVP-BKM120, an orally available pan-class I PI3-kinase inhibitor. Mol Cancer Ther. 11(2):317–328CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: revised RECIST guideline version. Eur J Cancer. 45(2):228–247CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: revised RECIST guideline version. Eur J Cancer. 45(2):228–247CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB (1999) Validation and utility of a self-report version of the PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary card study. Primary care evaluation of mental disorders. Patient health questionnaire. JAMA 282(18):1737–1744CrossRefPubMed Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB (1999) Validation and utility of a self-report version of the PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary card study. Primary care evaluation of mental disorders. Patient health questionnaire. JAMA 282(18):1737–1744CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB et al (2006) A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 166(10):1092–1097CrossRefPubMed Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB et al (2006) A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 166(10):1092–1097CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference MacDonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr, Cairncross JG (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol. 8(7):1277–1280CrossRefPubMed MacDonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr, Cairncross JG (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol. 8(7):1277–1280CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in Neuro-oncology Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 28(11):1963–1972CrossRefPubMed Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in Neuro-oncology Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 28(11):1963–1972CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Netland IA, Forde HE, Sleire L et al (2016) Treatment with the PI3K inhibitor buparlisib (NVP-BKM120) suppresses the growth of established patient-derived GBM xenografts and prolongs survival in nude rats. J Neurooncol 129(1):57–66CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Netland IA, Forde HE, Sleire L et al (2016) Treatment with the PI3K inhibitor buparlisib (NVP-BKM120) suppresses the growth of established patient-derived GBM xenografts and prolongs survival in nude rats. J Neurooncol 129(1):57–66CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Bendell JC, Rodon J, Burris HA et al (2012) Phase I, dose-escalation study of BKM120, and oral pan-Class I PI3K inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 30(3):282–290CrossRefPubMed Bendell JC, Rodon J, Burris HA et al (2012) Phase I, dose-escalation study of BKM120, and oral pan-Class I PI3K inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 30(3):282–290CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Mayer IA, Abramson VG, Isakoff SJ et al (2014) Stand up to cancer phase Ib study of pan-phosphoinositide-3-kinase inhibitor buparlisib with letrozole in estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 32(12):1202–1209CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mayer IA, Abramson VG, Isakoff SJ et al (2014) Stand up to cancer phase Ib study of pan-phosphoinositide-3-kinase inhibitor buparlisib with letrozole in estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 32(12):1202–1209CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Krop IE, Mayer IA, Ganju V et al (2016) Pictilisib for oestrogen receptor-positive, aromatase inhibitor-resistant, advanced or metastatic breast cancer (FERGI): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 17(6):811–821CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Krop IE, Mayer IA, Ganju V et al (2016) Pictilisib for oestrogen receptor-positive, aromatase inhibitor-resistant, advanced or metastatic breast cancer (FERGI): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 17(6):811–821CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Baselga J, Im SA, Iwata H et al (2017) Buparlisib plus fulvestrant versus placebo plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (BELLE-2): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 18(7):904–916CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Baselga J, Im SA, Iwata H et al (2017) Buparlisib plus fulvestrant versus placebo plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (BELLE-2): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 18(7):904–916CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Wen PY, Touat M, Alexander BM et al (2019) Buparlisib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma harboring phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway activation: an open-label, multicenter, multi-arm, phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 37(9):741–750CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wen PY, Touat M, Alexander BM et al (2019) Buparlisib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma harboring phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway activation: an open-label, multicenter, multi-arm, phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 37(9):741–750CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Okkenhaug K, Graupera M, Vanhaesebroeck B (2016) Targeting PI3K in cancer: impact on tumor cells, their protective stroma, angiogenesis, and immunotherapy. Cancer Discov 6(10):1090–1105CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Okkenhaug K, Graupera M, Vanhaesebroeck B (2016) Targeting PI3K in cancer: impact on tumor cells, their protective stroma, angiogenesis, and immunotherapy. Cancer Discov 6(10):1090–1105CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Rodon J, Dienstmann R, Serra V, Tabernero J (2013) Development of PI3K inhibitors: lessons learned from early clinical trials. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 10(3):143–153CrossRefPubMed Rodon J, Dienstmann R, Serra V, Tabernero J (2013) Development of PI3K inhibitors: lessons learned from early clinical trials. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 10(3):143–153CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Sarker D, Ang JE, Baird R et al (2015) First-in-human phase I study of pictilisib (GDC-0941), a potent pan-class I phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 21(1):77–86CrossRefPubMed Sarker D, Ang JE, Baird R et al (2015) First-in-human phase I study of pictilisib (GDC-0941), a potent pan-class I phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 21(1):77–86CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Chandarlapaty S, Sawai A, Scaltriti M et al (2011) AKT inhibition relieves feedback suppression of receptor tyrosine kinase expression and activity. Cancer Cell 19(1):58–71CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chandarlapaty S, Sawai A, Scaltriti M et al (2011) AKT inhibition relieves feedback suppression of receptor tyrosine kinase expression and activity. Cancer Cell 19(1):58–71CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Metadata
Title
Phase I/II study of bevacizumab with BKM120, an oral PI3K inhibitor, in patients with refractory solid tumors (phase I) and relapsed/refractory glioblastoma (phase II)
Authors
John D. Hainsworth
Kevin P. Becker
Tarek Mekhail
Sajeel A. Chowdhary
Janice Faulkner Eakle
David Wright
Robert M. Langdon
Kathleen J. Yost
Gilbert Darin Anthony Padula
Kimberly West-Osterfield
Meredith Scarberry
Candice A. Shaifer
Mythili Shastry
Howard A. Burris III
Kent Shih
Publication date
01-09-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03227-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2/2019 Go to the issue