Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Neurology 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Glioblastoma | Research

Identification of a key glioblastoma candidate gene, FUBP3, based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis

Authors: Jianmin Li, Zhao Zhang, Ke Guo, Shuhua Wu, Chong Guo, Xinfan Zhang, Zi Wang

Published in: BMC Neurology | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common aggressive malignant brain tumor. However, the molecular mechanism of glioblastoma formation is still poorly understood. To identify candidate genes that may be connected to glioma growth and development, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to construct a gene co-expression network between gene sets and clinical characteristics. We also explored the function of the key candidate gene.

Methods

Two GBM datasets were selected from GEO Datasets. The R language was used to identify differentially expressed genes. WGCNA was performed to construct a gene co-expression network in the GEO glioblastoma samples. A custom Venn diagram website was used to find the intersecting genes. The GEPIA website was applied for survival analysis to determine the significant gene, FUBP3. OS, DSS, and PFI analyses, based on the UCSC Cancer Genomics Browser, were performed to verify the significance of FUBP3. Immunohistochemistry was performed to evaluate the expression of FUBP3 in glioblastoma and adjacent normal tissue. KEGG and GO enrichment analyses were used to reveal possible functions of FUBP3. Microenvironment analysis was used to explore the relationship between FUBP3 and immune infiltration. Immunohistochemistry was performed to verify the results of the microenvironment analysis.

Results

GSE70231 and GSE108474 were selected from GEO Datasets, then 715 and 694 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from GSE70231 and GSE108474, respectively, were identified. We then performed weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and identified the most downregulated gene modules of GSE70231 and GSE108474, and 659 and 3915 module genes from GSE70231 and GSE108474, respectively, were selected. Five intersection genes (FUBP3, DAD1, CLIC1, ABR, and DNM1) were calculated by Venn diagram. FUBP3 was then identified as the only significant gene by survival analysis using the GEPIA website. OS, DSS, and PFI analyses verified the significance of FUBP3. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed FUBP3 expression in GBM and adjacent normal tissue. KEGG and GO analyses uncovered the possible function of FUBP3 in GBM. Tumor microenvironment analysis showed that FUBP3 may be connected to immune infiltration, and immunohistochemistry identified a positive correlation between immune cells (CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells, and macrophages) and FUBP3.

Conclusion

FUBP3 is associated with immune surveillance in GBM, indicating that it has a great impact on GBM development and progression. Therefore, interventions involving FUBP3 and its regulatory pathway may be a new approach for GBM treatment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ohgaki H, Kleihues P. Epidemiology and etiology of gliomas. Acta Neuropathol. 2005;109(1):93–108.CrossRef Ohgaki H, Kleihues P. Epidemiology and etiology of gliomas. Acta Neuropathol. 2005;109(1):93–108.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Maher EA, Brennan C, Wen PY, et al. Marked genomic differences characterize primary and secondary glioblastoma subtypes and identify two distinct molecular and clinical secondary glioblastoma entities. Cancer Res. 2006;66(23):11502–13.CrossRef Maher EA, Brennan C, Wen PY, et al. Marked genomic differences characterize primary and secondary glioblastoma subtypes and identify two distinct molecular and clinical secondary glioblastoma entities. Cancer Res. 2006;66(23):11502–13.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Young RM, Jamshidi A, Davis G, Sherman JH. Current trends in the surgical management and treatment of adult glioblastoma. Ann Transl Med. 2015;3(9):121.PubMedPubMedCentral Young RM, Jamshidi A, Davis G, Sherman JH. Current trends in the surgical management and treatment of adult glioblastoma. Ann Transl Med. 2015;3(9):121.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Nam JY, de Groot JF. Treatment of glioblastoma. J Oncol Pract. 2017;13(10):629–38.CrossRef Nam JY, de Groot JF. Treatment of glioblastoma. J Oncol Pract. 2017;13(10):629–38.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gallego O. Nonsurgical treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Curr Oncol. 2015;22(4):e273–81.CrossRef Gallego O. Nonsurgical treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Curr Oncol. 2015;22(4):e273–81.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Verhaak RG, Hoadley KA, Purdom E, et al. Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell. 2010;17(1):98–110.CrossRef Verhaak RG, Hoadley KA, Purdom E, et al. Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell. 2010;17(1):98–110.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways [published correction appears in Nature. 2013 Feb 28;494(7438):506]. Nature. 2008;455(7216):1061–8.CrossRef Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways [published correction appears in Nature. 2013 Feb 28;494(7438):506]. Nature. 2008;455(7216):1061–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Das S, McClain CJ, Rai SN. Fifteen years of gene set analysis for high-throughput genomic data: a review of statistical approaches and future challenges. Entropy (Basel). 2020;22(4):427 (Published 2020 Apr 10).CrossRef Das S, McClain CJ, Rai SN. Fifteen years of gene set analysis for high-throughput genomic data: a review of statistical approaches and future challenges. Entropy (Basel). 2020;22(4):427 (Published 2020 Apr 10).CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Head SR, Komori HK, LaMere SA, et al. Library construction for next-generation sequencing: overviews and challenges. Biotechniques. 2014;56(2):61-passim (Published 2014 Feb 1).CrossRef Head SR, Komori HK, LaMere SA, et al. Library construction for next-generation sequencing: overviews and challenges. Biotechniques. 2014;56(2):61-passim (Published 2014 Feb 1).CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Das S, Meher PK, Rai A, et al. Statistical approaches for gene selection, hub gene identification and module interaction in gene co-expression network analysis: an application to aluminum stress in soybean (Glycine max L.). PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169605 (Published 2017 Jan 5).CrossRef Das S, Meher PK, Rai A, et al. Statistical approaches for gene selection, hub gene identification and module interaction in gene co-expression network analysis: an application to aluminum stress in soybean (Glycine max L.). PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169605 (Published 2017 Jan 5).CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:559 (Published 2008 Dec 29).CrossRef Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:559 (Published 2008 Dec 29).CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chen S, Yang D, Lei C, et al. Identification of crucial genes in abdominal aortic aneurysm by WGCNA. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7873 (Published 2019 Oct 8).CrossRef Chen S, Yang D, Lei C, et al. Identification of crucial genes in abdominal aortic aneurysm by WGCNA. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7873 (Published 2019 Oct 8).CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Khatri P, Sirota M, Butte AJ. Ten years of pathway analysis: current approaches and outstanding challenges. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(2):e1002375.CrossRef Khatri P, Sirota M, Butte AJ. Ten years of pathway analysis: current approaches and outstanding challenges. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(2):e1002375.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Chen L, Zhang YH, Wang S, Zhang Y, Huang T, Cai YD. Prediction and analysis of essential genes using the enrichments of gene ontology and KEGG pathways. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0184129 (Published 2017 Sep 5).CrossRef Chen L, Zhang YH, Wang S, Zhang Y, Huang T, Cai YD. Prediction and analysis of essential genes using the enrichments of gene ontology and KEGG pathways. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0184129 (Published 2017 Sep 5).CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Thakkar JP, Dolecek TA, Horbinski C, et al. Epidemiologic and molecular prognostic review of glioblastoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(10):1985–96.CrossRef Thakkar JP, Dolecek TA, Horbinski C, et al. Epidemiologic and molecular prognostic review of glioblastoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(10):1985–96.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wilson TA, Karajannis MA, Harter DH. Glioblastoma multiforme: State of the art and future therapeutics. Surg Neurol Int. 2014;5:64 (Published 2014 May 8).CrossRef Wilson TA, Karajannis MA, Harter DH. Glioblastoma multiforme: State of the art and future therapeutics. Surg Neurol Int. 2014;5:64 (Published 2014 May 8).CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zhou W, Chung YJ, Parrilla Castellar ER, et al. Far upstream element binding protein plays a crucial role in embryonic development, hematopoiesis, and stabilizing Myc expression levels. Am J Pathol. 2016;186(3):701–15.CrossRef Zhou W, Chung YJ, Parrilla Castellar ER, et al. Far upstream element binding protein plays a crucial role in embryonic development, hematopoiesis, and stabilizing Myc expression levels. Am J Pathol. 2016;186(3):701–15.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Avigan MI, Strober B, Levens D. A far upstream element stimulates c-myc expression in undifferentiated leukemia cells. J Biol Chem. 1990;265(30):18538–45.CrossRef Avigan MI, Strober B, Levens D. A far upstream element stimulates c-myc expression in undifferentiated leukemia cells. J Biol Chem. 1990;265(30):18538–45.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Duncan R, Bazar L, Michelotti G, et al. A sequence-specific, single-strand binding protein activates the far upstream element of c-myc and defines a new DNA-binding motif. Genes Dev. 1994;8(4):465–80.CrossRef Duncan R, Bazar L, Michelotti G, et al. A sequence-specific, single-strand binding protein activates the far upstream element of c-myc and defines a new DNA-binding motif. Genes Dev. 1994;8(4):465–80.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Michelotti GA, Michelotti EF, Pullner A, Duncan RC, Eick D, Levens D. Multiple single-stranded cis elements are associated with activated chromatin of the human c-myc gene in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16(6):2656–69.CrossRef Michelotti GA, Michelotti EF, Pullner A, Duncan RC, Eick D, Levens D. Multiple single-stranded cis elements are associated with activated chromatin of the human c-myc gene in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16(6):2656–69.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Liu J, Akoulitchev S, Weber A, et al. Defective interplay of activators and repressors with TFIH in xeroderma pigmentosum. Cell. 2001;104(3):353–63.CrossRef Liu J, Akoulitchev S, Weber A, et al. Defective interplay of activators and repressors with TFIH in xeroderma pigmentosum. Cell. 2001;104(3):353–63.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Liu J, Kouzine F, Nie Z, et al. The FUSE/FBP/FIR/TFIIH system is a molecular machine programming a pulse of c-myc expression. EMBO J. 2006;25(10):2119–30.CrossRef Liu J, Kouzine F, Nie Z, et al. The FUSE/FBP/FIR/TFIIH system is a molecular machine programming a pulse of c-myc expression. EMBO J. 2006;25(10):2119–30.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Weber A, Liu J, Collins I, Levens D. TFIIH operates through an expanded proximal promoter to fine-tune c-myc expression. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25(1):147–61.CrossRef Weber A, Liu J, Collins I, Levens D. TFIIH operates through an expanded proximal promoter to fine-tune c-myc expression. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25(1):147–61.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Braddock DT, Louis JM, Baber JL, Levens D, Clore GM. Structure and dynamics of KH domains from FBP bound to single-stranded DNA. Nature. 2002;415:1051e1056.CrossRef Braddock DT, Louis JM, Baber JL, Levens D, Clore GM. Structure and dynamics of KH domains from FBP bound to single-stranded DNA. Nature. 2002;415:1051e1056.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Cukier CD, Hollingworth D, Martin SR, Kelly G, Díaz-Moreno I, Ramos A. Molecular basis of FIR-mediated c-myc transcriptional control. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(9):1058–64.CrossRef Cukier CD, Hollingworth D, Martin SR, Kelly G, Díaz-Moreno I, Ramos A. Molecular basis of FIR-mediated c-myc transcriptional control. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(9):1058–64.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Crichlow GV, Zhou H, Hsiao HH, et al. Dimerization of FIR upon FUSE DNA binding suggests a mechanism of c-myc inhibition. EMBO J. 2008;27(1):277–89.CrossRef Crichlow GV, Zhou H, Hsiao HH, et al. Dimerization of FIR upon FUSE DNA binding suggests a mechanism of c-myc inhibition. EMBO J. 2008;27(1):277–89.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hsiao HH, Nath A, Lin CY, Folta-Stogniew EJ, Rhoades E, Braddock DT. Quantitative characterization of the interactions among c-myc transcriptional regulators FUSE, FBP, and FIR. Biochemistry. 2010;49(22):4620–34.CrossRef Hsiao HH, Nath A, Lin CY, Folta-Stogniew EJ, Rhoades E, Braddock DT. Quantitative characterization of the interactions among c-myc transcriptional regulators FUSE, FBP, and FIR. Biochemistry. 2010;49(22):4620–34.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Gao Q, Zhou R, Meng Y, et al. Long noncoding RNA CMPK2 promotes colorectal cancer progression by activating the FUBP3-c-Myc axis. Oncogene. 2020;39(19):3926–38.CrossRef Gao Q, Zhou R, Meng Y, et al. Long noncoding RNA CMPK2 promotes colorectal cancer progression by activating the FUBP3-c-Myc axis. Oncogene. 2020;39(19):3926–38.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Weber A, Kristiansen I, Johannsen M, et al. The FUSE binding proteins FBP1 and FBP3 are potential c-myc regulators in renal, but not in prostate and bladder cancer. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:369.CrossRef Weber A, Kristiansen I, Johannsen M, et al. The FUSE binding proteins FBP1 and FBP3 are potential c-myc regulators in renal, but not in prostate and bladder cancer. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:369.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ding Z, Liu X, Liu Y, et al. Expression of far upstream element (FUSE) binding protein 1 in human glioma is correlated with c-Myc and cell proliferation. Mol Carcinog. 2015;54(5):405–15.CrossRef Ding Z, Liu X, Liu Y, et al. Expression of far upstream element (FUSE) binding protein 1 in human glioma is correlated with c-Myc and cell proliferation. Mol Carcinog. 2015;54(5):405–15.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Dunn GP, Bruce AT, Ikeda H, Old LJ, Schreiber RD. Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape. Nat Immunol. 2002;3(11):991–8.CrossRef Dunn GP, Bruce AT, Ikeda H, Old LJ, Schreiber RD. Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape. Nat Immunol. 2002;3(11):991–8.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Mittrücker HW, Visekruna A, Huber M. Heterogeneity in the differentiation and function of CD8+ T cells. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2014;62(6):449–58.CrossRef Mittrücker HW, Visekruna A, Huber M. Heterogeneity in the differentiation and function of CD8+ T cells. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2014;62(6):449–58.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Caza T, Landas S. Functional and Phenotypic Plasticity of CD4(+) T Cell Subsets. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:521957. Caza T, Landas S. Functional and Phenotypic Plasticity of CD4(+) T Cell Subsets. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:521957.
36.
go back to reference Bindea G, Mlecnik B, Tosolini M, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of intratumoral immune cells reveal the immune landscape in human cancer. Immunity. 2013;39(4):782–95.CrossRef Bindea G, Mlecnik B, Tosolini M, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of intratumoral immune cells reveal the immune landscape in human cancer. Immunity. 2013;39(4):782–95.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Ostuni R, Kratochvill F, Murray PJ, Natoli G. Macrophages and cancer: from mechanisms to therapeutic implications. Trends Immunol. 2015;36(4):229–39.CrossRef Ostuni R, Kratochvill F, Murray PJ, Natoli G. Macrophages and cancer: from mechanisms to therapeutic implications. Trends Immunol. 2015;36(4):229–39.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Koelzer VH, Canonica K, Dawson H, et al. Phenotyping of tumor-associated macrophages in colorectal cancer: impact on single cell invasion (tumor budding) and clinicopathological outcome. Oncoimmunology. 2015;5(4):e1106677.CrossRef Koelzer VH, Canonica K, Dawson H, et al. Phenotyping of tumor-associated macrophages in colorectal cancer: impact on single cell invasion (tumor budding) and clinicopathological outcome. Oncoimmunology. 2015;5(4):e1106677.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Chen Z, Hambardzumyan D. Immune Microenvironment in Glioblastoma Subtypes. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1004 (Published 2018 May 8).CrossRef Chen Z, Hambardzumyan D. Immune Microenvironment in Glioblastoma Subtypes. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1004 (Published 2018 May 8).CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Identification of a key glioblastoma candidate gene, FUBP3, based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis
Authors
Jianmin Li
Zhao Zhang
Ke Guo
Shuhua Wu
Chong Guo
Xinfan Zhang
Zi Wang
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Neurology / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02661-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Neurology 1/2022 Go to the issue