Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diagnostic Pathology 1/2008

Open Access 01-12-2008 | Proceedings

GFAP and alpha1a-AR staining and nuclear morphometry of oligodendrogliomas by confocal microscopy and image analysis: useful parameters for predicting survival in oligodendrogliomas

Authors: Ernesto Moro-Rodríguez, Javier Figols, Mariano Alvira, José A Uranga-Ocio, Eduardo García-Poblete

Published in: Diagnostic Pathology | Special Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

This study attempts to evaluate the GFAP and alpha1a-AR staining and morphometrical nuclear features of oligodendrogliomas and their prognostic implications as compared to present histopathology classification and their survival outcome.

Study design

Surgical specimens from 24 patients with oligodendrogliomas during the period 1981–2000 were included. These cases were classified into two groups defined by the grade of the neoplasm: Group I: oligodendrogliomas grade II; Group II: oligodendrogliomas grade III and two groups based on the outcome status: Group of the alive cases and group of the death cases. Death rate for the groups were obtained by patients' charts. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the groups with respect to the morphometrical nuclear variables; area, perimeter, aspect, axes (major and minor), diameters (max, mean and min.), radius (max. and min.) margination, ratio of perimeter-area, roundness and sizes (length and width). In addition, an immunofluorescence method for GFAP and 1a-AR were performed and their area, density and intensity of staining were analyzed.

Results

Semiautomated quantitative morphometrical results showed that the variables of nuclear area (GII 48.87 μm2 vs. GIII 43.45 μm2 p-value = 0.02), aspect (GII 1.39 vs. GIII 1.55 p-value = 0.03), axis minor (GII 6.66 μm vs. GIII 6.01 μm p-value = 0.003), diameter minor (GII 5.93 μm vs. GIII 5.27 μm p-value = 0.002), radius minor (GII 2.64 μm vs. GIII 2.25 μm p-value = 0,003), perimeter-area (GII 0.0007 vs. GIII 0.0006 p-value = 0.04), size width (GII 6.60 μm vs. GIII 5.96 μm p-value = 0,003), and density of alpha1a-AR staining (GII 121.38 vs. GIII 146.03 p-value = 0.05) were statistically significant in regard of grade; and that the sum of density of GFAP (p-value = 0.01) and the intensity of alpha1a-AR (p-value = 0.01) were statistically significant in predicting survival.

Conclusion

These results suggest that some nuclear morphometrical features and the GFAP and alpha1a-AR immunofluorescence staining may be useful parameters for predicting survival in oligodendrogliomas.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Nafe R, Yan B, Schlote W, Schneider B: Application of different methods for nuclear shape analysis with special reference to the differentiation of brain tumors. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 2006, 28: 69-77.PubMed Nafe R, Yan B, Schlote W, Schneider B: Application of different methods for nuclear shape analysis with special reference to the differentiation of brain tumors. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 2006, 28: 69-77.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Scarpelli M, Montironi R, Ansuini G, Pisani E, Rychlicki F, Papo I, Mariuzzi GM: The value of morphometry in prediction of survival in oligodendrogliomas. Clin Neuropathol. 1987, 6 (4): 155-159.PubMed Scarpelli M, Montironi R, Ansuini G, Pisani E, Rychlicki F, Papo I, Mariuzzi GM: The value of morphometry in prediction of survival in oligodendrogliomas. Clin Neuropathol. 1987, 6 (4): 155-159.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Yoshii Y, Saito At, Nose T: Nuclear morphometry and DNA densitometry of human gliomas by image analysis. J Neurooncol. 1995, 26: 1-9. 10.1007/BF01054763.CrossRefPubMed Yoshii Y, Saito At, Nose T: Nuclear morphometry and DNA densitometry of human gliomas by image analysis. J Neurooncol. 1995, 26: 1-9. 10.1007/BF01054763.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
GFAP and alpha1a-AR staining and nuclear morphometry of oligodendrogliomas by confocal microscopy and image analysis: useful parameters for predicting survival in oligodendrogliomas
Authors
Ernesto Moro-Rodríguez
Javier Figols
Mariano Alvira
José A Uranga-Ocio
Eduardo García-Poblete
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology / Issue Special Issue 1/2008
Electronic ISSN: 1746-1596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-3-S1-S26

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2008

Diagnostic Pathology 1/2008 Go to the issue