Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2016

01-10-2016 | Clinical trial

Genomic profiling of breast cancer in African-American women using MammaPrint

Authors: Raquel A. Nunes, Lynette Wray, Mihriye Mete, Pia Herbolsheimer, Karen L. Smith, Lana Bijelic, Marc E. Boisvert, Sandra M. Swain

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Breast cancer in African-American females (AAF) has a less favorable outcome than that in Caucasians. More information is needed regarding its biology. We evaluated gene expression in tumors from AAF presenting with early stage or locally advanced breast cancer using MammaPrint®, BluePrint ® (molecular subtype) and TargetPrint ® [estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor, and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) mRNA levels]. Genomic information was correlated with clinical and pathologic characteristics and Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score® (RS). One hundred Patients were enrolled, 1 not evaluable by BluePrint. The median age was 60 years (range 22–98), and eighty-four (84 %) patients had stage I or II disease. High Risk MammaPrint was present in 66 % of patients and in 52 % of patients with stage I disease. High Risk MammaPrint was associated with young age (p = 0.02), high grade (p < 0.0001), HER2 expression (p = 0.016), and triple-negative phenotype (p < 0.001). Sixty-four tumors (65 %) were Luminal type (47 % of these were classified as High Risk), 26 (26 %) were Basal type, and 9 (9 %) HER2 type. Twenty-two cancers were triple negative (TN) by IHC and 19 (90 %) Basal type. Among the 15 tumors HER2 positive by IHC/FISH, 8 (53 %) were HER2 type by BluePrint. Eleven tumors with ER expression of 1–9 % were ER negative by TargetPrint and none of these was Luminal type. None of the seven tumors HER2 positive by IHC/FISH but negative by TargetPrint was HER type. RS results were available in 29 patients: two had High Risk both by RS and MammaPrint; eight had intermediate RS, with four High Risk by MammaPrint; 19 had a low RS, with eight High Risk by MammaPrint. AAF with stage I to III breast cancer often present with High Risk disease. Molecular heterogeneity is present within TN, HER2-positive, and ER-positive breast cancer. RS and MammaPrint offer different prognostic information.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Wheeler SB, Reeder-Hayes KE, Carey LA (2013) Disparities in breast cancer treatment and outcomes: biological, social, and health system determinants and opportunities for research. Oncologist 18(9):986–993CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wheeler SB, Reeder-Hayes KE, Carey LA (2013) Disparities in breast cancer treatment and outcomes: biological, social, and health system determinants and opportunities for research. Oncologist 18(9):986–993CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Albain KS et al (2009) Racial disparities in cancer survival among randomized clinical trials patients of the Southwest Oncology Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 101(14):984–992CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Albain KS et al (2009) Racial disparities in cancer survival among randomized clinical trials patients of the Southwest Oncology Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 101(14):984–992CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Wojcik BE, Spinks MK, Optenberg SA (1998) Breast carcinoma survival analysis for African American and white women in an equal-access health care system. Cancer 82(7):1310–1318CrossRefPubMed Wojcik BE, Spinks MK, Optenberg SA (1998) Breast carcinoma survival analysis for African American and white women in an equal-access health care system. Cancer 82(7):1310–1318CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference O’Brien KM et al (2010) Intrinsic breast tumor subtypes, race, and long-term survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. Clin Cancer Res 16(24):6100–6110CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral O’Brien KM et al (2010) Intrinsic breast tumor subtypes, race, and long-term survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. Clin Cancer Res 16(24):6100–6110CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
7.
go back to reference Sorlie T et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(19):10869–10874CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sorlie T et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(19):10869–10874CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Sotiriou C, Pusztai L (2009) Gene-expression signatures in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 360(8):790–800CrossRefPubMed Sotiriou C, Pusztai L (2009) Gene-expression signatures in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 360(8):790–800CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Carey LA et al (2006) Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA 295(21):2492–2502CrossRefPubMed Carey LA et al (2006) Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA 295(21):2492–2502CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Harris LN et al (2016) Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 34(10):1134–1150CrossRefPubMed Harris LN et al (2016) Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 34(10):1134–1150CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sapino A et al (2014) MammaPrint molecular diagnostics on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. J Mol Diagn 16(2):190–197CrossRefPubMed Sapino A et al (2014) MammaPrint molecular diagnostics on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. J Mol Diagn 16(2):190–197CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Glas AM et al (2006) Converting a breast cancer microarray signature into a high-throughput diagnostic test. BMC Genom 7:278CrossRef Glas AM et al (2006) Converting a breast cancer microarray signature into a high-throughput diagnostic test. BMC Genom 7:278CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Buyse M et al (2006) Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(17):1183–1192CrossRefPubMed Buyse M et al (2006) Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(17):1183–1192CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Krijgsman O et al (2012) A diagnostic gene profile for molecular subtyping of breast cancer associated with treatment response. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133(1):37–47CrossRefPubMed Krijgsman O et al (2012) A diagnostic gene profile for molecular subtyping of breast cancer associated with treatment response. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133(1):37–47CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bayraktar S et al (2014) Molecular subtyping predicts pathologic tumor response in early-stage breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel plus capecitabine with or without trastuzumab chemotherapy. Med Oncol 31(10):163CrossRefPubMed Bayraktar S et al (2014) Molecular subtyping predicts pathologic tumor response in early-stage breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel plus capecitabine with or without trastuzumab chemotherapy. Med Oncol 31(10):163CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Keenan T et al (2015) Comparison of the genomic landscape between primary breast cancer in African American versus white women and the association of racial differences with tumor recurrence. J Clin Oncol 33(31):3621–3627CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Keenan T et al (2015) Comparison of the genomic landscape between primary breast cancer in African American versus white women and the association of racial differences with tumor recurrence. J Clin Oncol 33(31):3621–3627CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Sweeney C et al (2014) Intrinsic subtypes from PAM50 gene expression assay in a population-based breast cancer cohort: differences by age, race, and tumor characteristics. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 23(5):714–724CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sweeney C et al (2014) Intrinsic subtypes from PAM50 gene expression assay in a population-based breast cancer cohort: differences by age, race, and tumor characteristics. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 23(5):714–724CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Huo D et al (2009) Population differences in breast cancer: survey in indigenous African women reveals over-representation of triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 27(27):4515–4521CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huo D et al (2009) Population differences in breast cancer: survey in indigenous African women reveals over-representation of triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 27(27):4515–4521CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference van de Vijver MJ et al (2002) A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(25):1999–2009CrossRefPubMed van de Vijver MJ et al (2002) A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(25):1999–2009CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Mook S et al (2010) The 70-gene prognosis signature predicts early metastasis in breast cancer patients between 55 and 70 years of age. Ann Oncol 21(4):717–722CrossRefPubMed Mook S et al (2010) The 70-gene prognosis signature predicts early metastasis in breast cancer patients between 55 and 70 years of age. Ann Oncol 21(4):717–722CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Drukker CA et al (2013) A prospective evaluation of a breast cancer prognosis signature in the observational RASTER study. Int J Cancer 133(4):929–936CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Drukker CA et al (2013) A prospective evaluation of a breast cancer prognosis signature in the observational RASTER study. Int J Cancer 133(4):929–936CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Cardoso F, van’t Veer LJ, Bogaerts J, Slaets L, Viale G, Delaloge S, Pierga J-Y, Brain E, Causeret S, DeLorenzi M, Glas AM, Golfinopoulos V, Goulioti T, Knox S, Matos E, Meulemans B, Neijenhuis PA, Nitz U, Passalacqua R, Ravdin P, Rubio IT, Saghatchian M, Smilde TJ, Sotiriou C, Stork L, Straehle C, Thomas G, Thompson AM, van der Hoeven JM, Vuylsteke P, Bernards R, Tryfonidis K, Rutgers E, Piccart M (2016) 70-gene signature as an aid to treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 375(8):717–729CrossRefPubMed Cardoso F, van’t Veer LJ, Bogaerts J, Slaets L, Viale G, Delaloge S, Pierga J-Y, Brain E, Causeret S, DeLorenzi M, Glas AM, Golfinopoulos V, Goulioti T, Knox S, Matos E, Meulemans B, Neijenhuis PA, Nitz U, Passalacqua R, Ravdin P, Rubio IT, Saghatchian M, Smilde TJ, Sotiriou C, Stork L, Straehle C, Thomas G, Thompson AM, van der Hoeven JM, Vuylsteke P, Bernards R, Tryfonidis K, Rutgers E, Piccart M (2016) 70-gene signature as an aid to treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 375(8):717–729CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Albain KS et al (2010) Potential biologic causes of the racial survival disparity in adjuvant trials of ER-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol (Meet Abstr) 28(15_suppl):511 Albain KS et al (2010) Potential biologic causes of the racial survival disparity in adjuvant trials of ER-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol (Meet Abstr) 28(15_suppl):511
24.
go back to reference Sparano JA et al (2012) Race and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer outcomes in a randomized chemotherapy trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 104(5):406–414CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sparano JA et al (2012) Race and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer outcomes in a randomized chemotherapy trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 104(5):406–414CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Prat A et al (2015) Clinical implications of the intrinsic molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Breast 24(Suppl 2):S26–S35CrossRefPubMed Prat A et al (2015) Clinical implications of the intrinsic molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Breast 24(Suppl 2):S26–S35CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Perou CM (2011) Molecular stratification of triple-negative breast cancers. Oncologist 16(Suppl 1):61–70CrossRefPubMed Perou CM (2011) Molecular stratification of triple-negative breast cancers. Oncologist 16(Suppl 1):61–70CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Lehmann BD et al (2011) Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. J Clin Invest 121(7):2750–2767CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lehmann BD et al (2011) Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. J Clin Invest 121(7):2750–2767CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Carey LA et al (2016) Molecular heterogeneity and response to neoadjuvant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 targeting in CALGB 40601, a randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel plus trastuzumab with or without lapatinib. J Clin Oncol 34(6):542–549CrossRefPubMed Carey LA et al (2016) Molecular heterogeneity and response to neoadjuvant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 targeting in CALGB 40601, a randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel plus trastuzumab with or without lapatinib. J Clin Oncol 34(6):542–549CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Pogue-Geile KL et al (2015) Intrinsic subtypes, PIK3CA mutation, and the degree of benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab in the NSABP B-31 trial. J Clin Oncol 33(12):1340–1347CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pogue-Geile KL et al (2015) Intrinsic subtypes, PIK3CA mutation, and the degree of benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab in the NSABP B-31 trial. J Clin Oncol 33(12):1340–1347CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Iwamoto T et al (2012) Estrogen receptor (ER) mRNA and ER-related gene expression in breast cancers that are 1–10 % ER-positive by immunohistochemistry. J Clin Oncol 30(7):729–734CrossRefPubMed Iwamoto T et al (2012) Estrogen receptor (ER) mRNA and ER-related gene expression in breast cancers that are 1–10 % ER-positive by immunohistochemistry. J Clin Oncol 30(7):729–734CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Hammond ME et al (2010) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(16):2784–2795CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hammond ME et al (2010) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(16):2784–2795CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Wolff AC et al (2013) Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 31(31):3997–4013CrossRefPubMed Wolff AC et al (2013) Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 31(31):3997–4013CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Clough K et al (2012) Abstract P6-07-03: risk classification of early stage breast cancer as assessed by MammaPrint and Oncotype DX genomic assays. Cancer Res 72(24 Supplement):P6-07-03CrossRef Clough K et al (2012) Abstract P6-07-03: risk classification of early stage breast cancer as assessed by MammaPrint and Oncotype DX genomic assays. Cancer Res 72(24 Supplement):P6-07-03CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Bartlett JM et al (2016) Comparing breast cancer multiparameter tests in the OPTIMA prelim trial: no test is more equal than the others. J Natl Cancer Inst 108(9) Bartlett JM et al (2016) Comparing breast cancer multiparameter tests in the OPTIMA prelim trial: no test is more equal than the others. J Natl Cancer Inst 108(9)
35.
go back to reference Curtis C et al (2012) The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature 486(7403):346–352PubMedPubMedCentral Curtis C et al (2012) The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature 486(7403):346–352PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Genomic profiling of breast cancer in African-American women using MammaPrint
Authors
Raquel A. Nunes
Lynette Wray
Mihriye Mete
Pia Herbolsheimer
Karen L. Smith
Lana Bijelic
Marc E. Boisvert
Sandra M. Swain
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3949-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine