Top

Journal of Public Health

Published in:

01-06-2016 | Original Article

Genetics in the medical and psychosocial practice: on the role of value hierarchies in counselling

Authors: Brigitte Gschmeidler, Magdalena Flatscher-Thöni, Elke Knitel-Grabher

Published in: Journal of Public Health | Issue 3/2016

Abstract

Aim

Values and value hierarchies play an important role in different health and counselling settings. Since personal values underlie our actions, guide our decisions and influence interactions, they can be assumed to influence doctor-patient relationships and therefore especially counselling situations. The aim of our study is to provide a sound empirical contribution to the increasing literature on values in health care settings.

Subject and methods

This article focusses on the personal values of professional groups involved in the medical and psychosocial care of patients or clients with genetic concerns. Results from 120 survey respondents who completed the Schwartz value survey reveal differences between the professional groups in their value hierarchies.

Results

There is a widespread, pan-cultural similarity regarding value hierarchies. Our results are in accordance with this universal hierarchy but show slight differences between the professional groups of the sample: Medical professionals ranked achievement and power values significantly higher. Psychosocial professionals, on the other hand, ranked universalism and hedonism values significantly higher than medical professionals.

Conclusion

Values motivate actions and serve as standards to evaluate them. As they can be presumed to influence the doctor-patient relationship and health care decisions, it is worth discussing differences in values and value hierarchies. Particular attention to that topic might be of interest for training and further education.

Austrian Gene Technology Act, §69

The Austrian guidelines for genetic counselling regulated in the Austrian Book of Gene Technology are currently in revision.

oFb 2.0 (http://ofb.msd-media.de)

In this sense, completed is understood as filled out to the last page. Respondents still might have skipped single items.

Statistical analyses were done with IBM SPSS Statistics 22.

Aavik T, Aavik A, Punab M (2014) Personal values that support and counteract utilization of a screening test for prostate cancer. Behav Med 40:22–28. doi:10.1080/08964289.2013.831805 CrossRefPubMed

Abad-Perotín R, Asúnsolo-Del Barco Á, Silva-Mato A (2012) A survey of ethical and professional challenges experienced by Spanish health-care professionals that provide genetic counseling services. J Genet Couns 21:85–100. doi:10.1007/s10897-011-9382-9 CrossRefPubMed

Alliman S, McCarthy Veach P, Bartels DM, Lian F, James C, Leroy BS (2009) A comparative analysis of ethical and professional challenges experienced by australian and US genetic counselors. J Genet Couns 18:379–394. doi:10.1007/s10897-009-9229-9 CrossRefPubMed

Altamirano-Bustamante MM, Altamirano-Bustamante NF, Lifshitz A, Mora-Magaña I, de Hoyos A, Avila-Osorio MT, Quintana-Vargas S, Aguirre JA, Méndez J, Murata C, Nava-Diosdado R, Martínez-González O, Calleja E, Vargas R, Mejía-Arangure JM, Cortez-Domínguez A, Vedrenne-Gutiérrez F, Sueiras P, Garduño J, Islas-Andrade S, Salamanca F, Kumate-Rodríguez J, Reyes-Fuentes A (2013) Promoting networks between evidence-based medicine and values-based medicine in continuing medical education. BMC Med 11:39. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-39 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Anderson RM, Funnell MM (2010) Patient empowerment: myths and misconceptions. Patient Educ Couns 79:277–282. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.025 CrossRefPubMed

Bardi A, Schwartz SH (2003) Values and behavior: strength and structure of relations. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 29:1207–1220. doi:10.1177/0146167203254602 CrossRefPubMed

Bartels DM, LeRoy BS, McCarthy P, Caplan AL (1997) Nondirectiveness in genetic counseling: a survey of practitioners. Am J Med Genet 72:172–179. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19971017)72:2<172::AID-AJMG9>3.0.CO;2-X CrossRefPubMed

Bernhardt BA, Silver R, Rushton CH, Micco E, Geller G (2010) What keeps you up at night? Genetics professionals’ distressing experiences in patient care. Genet Med 12:289–297. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181db82d9 CrossRefPubMed

Bower MA, Veach PM, Bartels DM, LeRoy BS (2002) A survey of genetic counselors’ strategies for addressing ethical and professional challenges in practice. J Genet Couns 11:163–186. doi:10.1023/A:1015275022199 CrossRefPubMed

Bundesministerium für Gesundheit und Frauen (2002) Gentechnikbuch: 2. Kapitel. Leitlinien für die genetische Beratung (beschlossen von der Gentechnikkommission am 24. Juni 2002)

Church GM (2005) The personal genome project. Mol Syst Biol 1:1–3. doi:10.1038/msb4100040

Colombo C, Moja L, Gonzalez-Lorenzo M, Liberati A, Mosconi P (2012) Patient empowerment as a component of health system reforms: rights, benefits and vested interests. Intern Emerg Med 7:183–187. doi:10.1007/s11739-012-0757-1 CrossRefPubMed

Di Dio L, Saragovi C, Koestner R, Aubé J (1996) Linking personal values to gender. Sex Roles 34:621–636. doi:10.1007/BF01551498 CrossRef

Eliason BC, Guse C, Gottlieb MS (2000) Personal values of family physicians, practice satisfaction, and service to the underserved. Arch Fam Med 9:228–232CrossRefPubMed

Elwyn G, Gray J, Clarke A (2000) Shared decision making and non-directiveness in genetic counselling. J Med Genet 37:135–138. doi:10.1136/jmg.37.2.135 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Eng C (2013) Molecular genetics to genomic medicine practice: at the heart of value-based delivery of healthcare. Mol Genet Genomics Med 1:4–6. doi:10.1002/mgg3.8 CrossRef

Fischer R, Schwartz S (2011) Whence differences in value priorities?: individual, cultural, or artifactual sources. J Cross Cult Psychol 42:1127–1144. doi:10.1177/0022022110381429 CrossRef

Fulford KWM, Peile E, Carroll H (2012) Essential values-based practice. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef

Geller G, Micco E, Silver RJ, Kolodner K, Bernhardt BA (2009) The role and impact of personal faith and religion among genetic service providers. Am J Med Genet C: Semin Med Genet 151C:31–40. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.30193 CrossRef

Greenbaum D, Sboner A, Mu XJ, Gerstein M (2011) Genomics and privacy: implications of the new reality of closed data for the field. PLoS Comput Biol. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002278 PubMedPubMedCentral

Groepper D, McCarthy Veach P, LeRoy BS, Bower M (2014) Ethical and professional challenges encountered by laboratory genetic counselors. J Genet Couns. doi:10.1007/s10897-014-9787-3 PubMed

Gschmeidler B, Flatscher-Thoeni M (2013) Ethical and professional challenges of genetic counseling—the case of Austria. J Genet Couns 22:741–752. doi:10.1007/s10897-013-9610-6 CrossRefPubMed

Kelly EWJ (1995) Counselor values: a national survey. J Couns Dev. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1995.tb01810.x

Leontini R (2010) Genetic counselling as care of the self. Health (Irvine Calif) 14:383–397. doi:10.1177/1363459309360791

Lunshof JE, Ball MP (2013) Our genomes today: time to be clear. Genome Med 5:52. doi:10.1186/gm456 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lunshof JE, Chadwick R, Vorhaus DB, Church GM (2008) From genetic privacy to open consent. Nat Rev Genet 9:406–411. doi:10.1038/nrg2360 CrossRefPubMed

McCarthy Veach P, Bartels DM, LeRoy BS (2001) Ethical and professional challenges posed by patients with genetic concerns: a report of focus group discussions with genetic counselors, physicians, and nurses. J Genet Couns 10:97–119. doi:10.1023/A:1009487513618 CrossRef

Nosse LJ, Sagiv L (2005) Theory-based study of the basic values of 565 physical therapists. Phys Ther 85:834–850PubMed

Peile E (2013) Evidence-based medicine and values-based medicine: partners in clinical education as well as in clinical practice. BMC Med 11:40. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-40 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Pirzadeh SM, McCarthy Veach P, Bartels DM, Kao J, Leroy BS (2007) A national survey of genetic counselors’ personal values. J Genet Couns 16:763–773. doi:10.1007/s10897-007-9108-1 CrossRefPubMed

Rantanen E, Hietala M, Kristoffersson U, Nippert I, Schmidtke J, Sequeiros J, Kääriäinen H (2008) What is ideal genetic counselling? A survey of current international guidelines. Eur J Hum Genet 16:445–452. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201983 CrossRefPubMed

Rentmeester CA (2001) Value neutrality in genetic counseling: an unattained ideal. Med Health Care Philos 4:47–51. doi:10.1023/A:1009972728031 CrossRefPubMed

Rokeach M (1973) The nature of human values. Free Press, New York

Schildmann J, Tan J, Salloch S, Vollmann J (2013) “Well, I think there is great variation…”: a qualitative study of oncologists’ experiences and views regarding medical criteria and other factors relevant to treatment decisions in advanced cancer. Oncologist 18:90–96. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0206 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Schwartz SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Adv Exp Psychol 25:1–65. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6 CrossRef

Schwartz SH (1994) Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? J Soc Issues 50:19–45. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x CrossRef

Schwartz SH (2012) An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Read Psychol Cult 2:1–20. doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116

Schwartz SH, Bardi A (2001) Value hierarchies across cultures: taking a similarities perspective. J Cross Cult Psychol 32:268–290. doi:10.1177/0022022101032003002 CrossRef

Schwartz SH, Bilsky W (1987) Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. J Pers Soc Psychol 53:550–562. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.53.3.550 CrossRef

Schwartz SH, Rubel T (2005) Sex differences in value priorities: cross-cultural and multimethod studies. J Pers Soc Psychol 89:1010–1028. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.1010 CrossRefPubMed

Schwartz SH, Rubel-Lifschitz T (2009) Cross-national variation in the size of sex differences in values: effects of gender equality. J Pers Soc Psychol 97:171–185. doi:10.1037/a0015546 CrossRefPubMed

Schwartz SH, Verkasalo M, Antonovsky A, Sagiv L (1997) Value priorities and social desirability: much substance, some style. Br J Soc Psychol 36:3–18. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01115.x CrossRef

Van Kleffens T, Van Leeuwen E (2005) Physicians’ evaluations of patients’ decisions to refuse oncological treatment. J Med Ethics 31:131–136. doi:10.1136/jme.2004.008755 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Title: Genetics in the medical and psychosocial practice: on the role of value hierarchies in counselling
Authors: Brigitte Gschmeidler
Magdalena Flatscher-Thöni
Elke Knitel-Grabher
Publication date: 01-06-2016
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Journal of Public Health / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 2198-1833
Electronic ISSN: 1613-2238
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-016-0719-6

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Genetics in the medical and psychosocial practice: on the role of value hierarchies in counselling

Abstract

Aim

Subject and methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Aim

Subject and methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Awareness and utilization of selected preventive reproductive health services among women of reproductive age group in a rural community in South-West Nigeria

Community pharmacy-based opiate substitution treatment and related health services: a study of 508 patients and 111 pharmacies

A nested case-control study on type-specific persistent HPV infection in Uyghur women

Intervention effects of a school-based health promotion program on children’s motor skills

Attitudes of health care professionals towards Mutual Health Organizations: evidence from two regions in the Northwest Province of Cameroon

Prevalence and factors associated to bruxism in preschool children